Advertising


News

Halt the Hospital in the Home ‘headaches’: RACGP


Michelle Wisbey


18/04/2024 3:17:27 PM

Plagued with inconsistent guidance, billing confusion, and poor communication, the college has written to the Health Minister calling for change.

Doctor taking patient's blood pressure.
The college is calling for restrictions to be removed on admitted HITH patients accessing MBS services.

The RACGP is calling on political leaders to make sweeping changes to Hospital in the Home (HITH) programs, saying they are currently hindered by red tape, administration, and billing nightmares.
 
In a letter to Federal Health and Aged Care Minister Mark Butler, the college warned the program is being held back by a lack of consistent policy and guidance.

The RACGP is calling for the Federal Government to issue clear and national rules to state and territory health departments and their hospitals about GP liaison upon patient admission, referrals, and subsequent billing practices.
 
‘This is imperative for improving clarity and consistency on the requirements, expectations and principles for funding across the general practice and hospital interface and ensuring continuity of care for all patients,’ the letter said.
 
Additionally, the college wants restrictions removed on admitted HITH patients accessing MBS services from their GP, saying the failure to support continuity and appropriate shared care is a risk to patient safety and outcomes.
 
RACGP President Dr Nicole Higgins said these growing issues are dictating how and when GPs can provide care to their patients.
 
‘The funding and cost arrangements aren’t working, so let’s change them,’ she said.
 
‘Let’s make it more straightforward for everyone by allowing patients to access Medicare rebates and GPs to co-manage their patients care.
 
‘Remember that particularly during a time of high cost-of-living pressures, concerns about cost sway many people’s decisions about the healthcare they do or don’t receive. Let’s make sure they are getting the best possible care from a GP they know and trust, it can make all the difference.’
 
The RACGP has also recommended including clinical handover requirements under MyMedicare arrangements, in which the HITH program must contact a patient’s usual GP, both on admission and discharge.
 
It likewise says GPs must be allowed to co-bill and co-manage their patients’ care.
 
The Head of General Practice and Primary Care Research at the University of Notre Dame, Professor Charlotte Hespe, told newsGP that while HITH is a much-needed addition to the healthcare system, it should not lead to patients being denied a GP.
 
‘It’s not fair for anybody, especially if the Hospital in the Home says, “go and see your GP about that”, but the patient is being denied access to affordable care or appropriate care if they can’t afford it,’ she said.
 
‘If they’re being looked after in the community, there has to be an ability for them to continue to see their GP for all their other stuff because Hospital in the Home is not designed to cover all of their healthcare needs.’
 
‘Let’s just continue to put our focus on the patient and what the patient needs to be able to access appropriate care, in the appropriate place, at the appropriate time, and Hospital in the Home is a fantastic model to do that, but not at the expense of then denying them access to their GP.’
 
In its letter, the RACGP’s examples of confusion include whether a patient requesting a routine appointment with their regular GP for diabetes management would be able to access Medicare rebates if they are enrolled in HITH for foot ulcer dressings.
 
Another example occurs in Western Australia, where hospitals request HITH patients undergo clearances and screenings performed by their GP, which could result in the GP taking a risk if they bill Medicare.
 
Log in below to join the conversation



general practice home care Hospital in the Home Mark Butler


newsGP weekly poll Which RACGP request would you most like the Government to fund in the upcoming Federal Budget?
 
25%
 
8%
 
55%
 
3%
 
6%
Related



newsGP weekly poll Which RACGP request would you most like the Government to fund in the upcoming Federal Budget?

Advertising

Advertising


Login to comment

Assoc Prof Michael Montalto   19/04/2024 8:28:50 AM

HITH patients are, in almost every jurisdiction in Australia, hospital inpatients. The hospital should be responsible for the entire episode of care: nursing, medical, pharmacy, on call, etc. Just as for all inpatients, the hospital medical service should be responsible for all the medical care during the HITH episode. Then, GPs should receive discharge information just as for any discharged hospital patient. The duplication and confusion is caused by those hospital systems that allow engagement with GPs during the HITH admission which is poor practice, for many reasons including those raised by the College. The solution is not what the President has suggested, but rather reminding hospitals that they should manage their HITH patients completely during the HITH admission. That is the best clinical governance, but also hospitals are paid to do so.
Also, it would be nice if the College consulted with some HIH doctors (some who are Fellows!) regarding HITH before making these declarations


Dr Peter James Strickland   19/04/2024 2:48:06 PM

The old aphorism is, " the more doctors involved in your case, the more likely you are to die, i.e. due to confusion of facts and recommendations". In home hospital care should be left totally to the hospital involved until there is a clear hand-over to the GP, and after the GP is FULLY informed of the recommendations for any ongoing care when that handover occurs. No ifs or buts!


Dr Rohit Sood   19/04/2024 3:14:12 PM

I would completely agree with what has been said by Assoc Prof Michael Montalto.
The HITH is part of the hospital system. As long as the patient is admitted to the HITH, the entire care should be the responsibility of the hospital system. The team of the admitting hospital consultant is responsible for further referrals as required to other specialties as well as to Allied Health Service like dietician, physiotherapy, social worker, etc as is routinely done for in patients. I dont see any ambiguity in this.
Allowing patients to access GP clinic services will only create confusion and fragmentation of hospital care. I have experienced this myself.
I beg to differ with the views of the College expressed in the article.


Dr BE   20/04/2024 9:40:21 PM

I 100% agree with Dr Peter James Strickland. There is no point for GP to get involved when patient is already under care of hospital.


Dr DP   27/04/2024 2:49:30 PM

Another one to agree with all the above comments. The hospital is block funded for ALL care under HITH, this includes non-PBS medications, dressings etc etc. The solution is to make sure the hospital properly carries out the duties for which it is being (VERY generously) funded, not offer to do it for them for $40. Sorry RACGP, you're barking up the wrong tree here.