Advertising

Case study
Volume 55, Issue 6, June 2026

The enigma of cephalgia: Evolving headaches in a young woman

Elizabeth Prins    Bosco Wu   
doi: 10.31128/AJGP-07-25-7759   |    Download article
Cite this article    BIBTEX    REFER    RIS

CASE

A marketing professional aged 38 years presents to her general practitioner (GP) with headaches that first appeared in her late teenage years. She had left-sided throbbing pain, with a visual aura of scotomas occurring 30 minutes prior. The headaches typically lasted for 2 days and occurred every 3–4 months, approximately 7–10 days before menstruation. There is a family history of migraine. She is fit and healthy and lives with her husband. She uses the copper intrauterine device as contraception. Her past medical history includes lumbo-sacral back pain managed with microsurgical discectomy in 2024.


Question 1

What are some potential causes of her headaches and their typical features?

Answer 1

Common causes of headache are outlined in Table 1. The estimated global prevalence of migraine is 14.4%, with women more commonly affected.1 Tension-type headache is also common, with a lifetime prevalence between 30 and 78%.2 Cluster headache is hugely burdensome for patients, with attacks occurring in series lasting weeks or months. Remission periods usually last months or years, though 10–15% of patients suffer without remission.2 Cluster headache’s immense physical and emotional toll has long been associated with increased rates of self-harm. The US Cluster Headache Survey in 2011 reported 55% of responders had contemplated suicide and 2% had attempted suicide.3

Table 1. Common causes of headache and their typical features2
  Migraine Tension-type headache Cluster headache
Location Unilateral (can be bilateral) Bilateral Unilateral: orbital, supraorbital, temporal or in a combination
Quality of pain Pulsating, moderate/severe intensity Pressing/tightening, mild/moderate intensity Severe
Associated symptoms
  • Nausea
  • Photophobia
  • Phonophobia
  • Photophobia
  • Phonophobia
  • Ipsilateral conjunctival injection
  • Lacrimation
  • Nasal congestion
  • Rhinorrhoea
  • Forehead/facial sweating
  • Miosis
  • Ptosis
  • Eyelid oedema
  • Restlessness/agitation
Duration 4–72 hours Minutes to days 15 minutes to 3 hours, once every other day to 8 times a day

Case continued

In her teens, the headaches were not relieved by simple analgesics. She was trialled on naratriptan in her late 20s because of poor response to other first-line treatments.4 This has been continued on an ‘as required’ basis because of its effectiveness.


Question 2

What are the indications and pharmacological options for migraine prophylaxis?

Answer 2

Migraine prophylaxis might be considered when patients require acute migraine treatment on more than 2–4 days per month. Prophylactic drugs should be taken for 8–12 weeks to assess efficacy. First-line drugs are amitriptyline, candesartan, nortriptyline, pizotifen, topiramate, or verapamil sustained-release.4 Drug choice might be guided by patient comorbidities, medications, and tolerance to potential adverse effects. A 2017 literature search by He et al recommended propranolol when considering safety and patient tolerability along with efficacy.5


Case continued

She subsequently presented in her mid-30s with severe right-sided retro-orbital pain that progressed over 5 days. The pain was worse at extremes of eye movements, particularly in the vertical plane. There was ptosis, but no aura or visual disturbances.


Question 3

What are trigeminal autonomic cephalgias and their differentiating features?

Answer 3

Trigeminal autonomic cephalgias are a group of primary, side-locked headache disorders characterised by unilateral trigeminal distribution pain and prominent ipsilateral cranial autonomic features (Table 2). Cluster headache is the most common, affecting around one in 500 people with a male predominance. Typical onset is after the age of 20 years.6 First-line acute therapies are hi-flow oxygen or triptans, with verapamil or glucocorticoids as prophylaxis.7 A trial of indomethacin is helpful since paroxysmal hemicrania and hemicrania continua are both responsive and can be differentiated by frequency and duration of attacks.

Table 2. Trigeminal autonomic cephalgias and their differentiating features2,7
  Short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache Paroxysmal hemicrania Cluster headache Hemicrania continua
Duration 1 second to 10 minutes 2–30 minutes 15 minutes to 3 hours >3 months
(with exacerbations)
Frequency ≥1 daily >5 daily 1 every other day to 8 daily  
Response to indomethacin No Yes, required for diagnosis Sometimes Yes, required for diagnosis
Triggers Tactile stimuli (eg touching face, shaving, brushing teeth) Stress, exercise, alcohol Alcohol, heat Alcohol
Restlessness No Yes Yes Yes, or aggravation of pain
by movement

Case continued

Due to the persistent nature of her headaches, she was trialled on galcanezumab, a subcutaneous monoclonal antibody injection. Galcanezumab attaches and blocks calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). CGRP is a target in migraine and cluster headache prophylaxis because of its role in mediating trigeminovascular pain transmission as well as neurogenic inflammation.8 Galcanezumab should be used with caution in patients with cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease because of its vasodilatory effects.9 CGRP monoclonal antibodies can be initiated on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) by a neurologist, or a GP in consultation with a neurologist.


Question 4

With consideration of Murtagh’s diagnostic model, what is a diagnosis not to be missed in an overweight female of childbearing age who presents with headache?

Answer 4

Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension (also known as Pseudotumor Cerebri) should be considered in patients presenting with headache of unusual severity. Typically, females of childbearing age who are overweight are most commonly affected. This condition involves symptomatic raised intracranial pressure with no cause. Work-up, including neuroimaging and lumbar puncture, shows normal brain parenchyma and ventricles, with normal cerebrospinal fluid composition and high opening pressure. Vision changes are common and concerning, with risk of permanent vision loss. Fundoscopic assessment for papilloedema is vital.10

Conclusion

The patient has found a reduction in headache frequency and severity using galcanezumab with an improvement in her quality of life.

Key points

  • Some trigeminal autonomic cephalgias are responsive to indomethacin.
  • Migraine prophylaxis should be considered in patients needing treatment for more than 2–4 days per month.
  • Injectables such as CGRP blockers can be used for migraine prophylaxis.
Competing interests: None.
AI declaration: The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned, externally peer reviewed.
Funding: None.
Correspondence to:
lizzieprins99@gmail.com
This event attracts CPD points and can be self recorded

Did you know you can now log your CPD with a click of a button?

Create Quick log
References
  1. Burch RC, Buse DC, Lipton RB. Migraine: Epidemiology, burden, and comorbidity. Neurol Clin 2019;37(4):631–49. doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2019.06.001. Search PubMed
  2. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The international classification of headache disorders. 3rd edn. Cephalalgia 2018;38(1):1–211. Search PubMed
  3. Rozen TD, Fishman RS. Cluster headache in the United States of America: Demographics, clinical characteristics, triggers, suicidality, and personal burden. American Headache Society, 2011; p. 99–113. Search PubMed
  4. Migraine: Therapeutic Guidelines, 2017. Available at https://portal.tg.org.au/?appReturnUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fapp.tg.org.au%2FviewTopic%3FetgAccess%3Dtrue%26guidelinePage%3DNeurology%26topicfile%3Dmigraine%26guidelinename%3DNeurology%26sectionId%3Dtoc_d1e47%23toc_d1e47&targetApp=tg [Accessed 4 June 2025]. Search PubMed
  5. He A, Song D, Zhang L, Li C. Unveiling the relative efficacy, safety and tolerability of prophylactic medications for migraine: Pairwise and network- meta analysis. J Headache Pain 2017;18(26):26. doi: 10.1186/s10194-017-0720-7. Search PubMed
  6. Russell MB. Epidemiology and genetics of cluster headache. Lancet Neurol 2004;3(5):279–83. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(04)00735-5. Search PubMed
  7. May A. Cluster headache: Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Lancet 2005;366(9488):843–55. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67217-0. Search PubMed
  8. Charles A, Pozo-Rosich P. Targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide: A new era in migraine therapy. Lancet 2019;394(10210):1765–74. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32504-8. Search PubMed
  9. Galcanezumab: Australian Medicines Handbook, 2025. Available at https://amhonline.amh.net.au/chapters/neurological-drugs/drugs-migraine/calcitonin-gene-related-peptide-antagonists/galcanezumab [Accessed 23 June 2025]. Search PubMed
  10. Thambisetty M, Lavin PJ, Newman NJ, Biousse V. Fulminant idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neurology 2007;68(3):229–32. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000251312.19452.ec. Search PubMed

Headache

Download article