Advertising


News

Major step to remove GP ‘gag clause’


Karen Burge


15/10/2025 3:48:01 PM

New legislation allows Victorian GPs to raise voluntary assisted dying with their patients for the first time – a change brought about by doctors’ advocacy to Government.

Elderly person holding hands with another
‘The removal of this ‘gag clause’ will have such a meaningful impact,’ says RACGP Victoria Chair Dr Anita Muñoz.

Victoria is a step closer to removing a ‘gag clause’ preventing GPs from raising voluntary assisted dying (VAD) with their patients, in a move described as a ‘sensible step’ by the RACGP.
 
Victorian Health Minister Mary-Anne Thomas introduced an amendment to the Voluntary Assisted Dying Act 2017 on Tuesday to remove unnecessary access barriers, improve clarity for practitioners, strengthen safety measures and make the system fairer and more compassionate.
 
‘We’ve listened to doctors who have told us they want to have open, honest conversations with patients about all their end-of-life options, so they can make safe and informed decisions,’ she said.
 
Victoria was the first state in Australia to rollout VAD laws, which passed through its Parliament in 2017 and began in 2019. Since then, the laws have allowed 1683 terminally ill Victorians to make their own decisions about their death.
 
The proposed changes put to Parliament come after a recent independent review into the VAD scheme’s first five years found some processes and safeguards were impeding access and undermining patient-centred care.
 
‘We know our Australian-first VAD laws work to alleviate suffering and give Victorians a safe choice – but we know we need to bring them into line with other states, so more Victorians can live out their final days on their own terms,’ the Health Minister said.
 
The reforms aim to maintain Victoria’s strong safeguards, ensuring decisions are voluntary, the person has decision-making capacity, and that they are free from coercion.
 
Among 13 proposed amendments, key changes include:

  • removing of the ‘gag clause’, so that registered health practitioners are allowed to raise VAD with their patients during discussion about end-of-life options
  • extending the prognosis requirement (life expectancy limit for eligibility) from six months to 12 months
  • removing the need for a third prognosis for people with neurodegenerative diseases (like motor neurone disease) if their expected lifespan is between six and 12 months
  • introducing a new administering practitioner role to expand the workforce able to support VAD.
According to its VAD position statement, the RACGP is ‘acutely aware there are a range of views on voluntary assisted dying, both within the general practice profession and the broader community’.
 
‘Arguments for and against legalisation for voluntary assisted dying are highly complex and raise significant practical and ethical issues,’ it states.
 
‘Both proponents and opponents of voluntary assisted dying wish to alleviate suffering of dying patients, and recognise that doctors as medical professionals have ethical responsibilities and are not merely providers of services.’
 
RACGP Victoria Chair Dr Anita Muñoz said the proposed amendments are ‘the right thing to do after listening to the experts and those impacted by the limitations of the current scheme’.
 
‘The removal of this ‘gag clause’ will have such a meaningful impact, as will extending the life expectancy limit for eligibility from six months to a year,’ she said.
 
‘Perhaps most significantly of all, we welcome the introduction of a new administering practitioner role to expand the workforce able to support voluntary assisted dying.
 
‘The college looks forward to working closely with the Government to better understand the finer points of this reform and the role of GPs and practice teams.’
 
Dr Muñoz said the amendments would remove access barriers to VAD, with too many people living outside of major cities having faced unfair obstacles to access the scheme.
 
‘Patients in excruciating pain who are immobile and only want to end their suffering have had to travel many hours to consult with non-GP specialists such as oncologists,’ she said.
 
‘By ending that requirement, voluntary assisted dying is more accessible for terminally ill people in rural and remote communities across Victoria.’
 
VAD laws operate in all states and will commence in the Australian Capital Territory on 3 November after passing through parliament last year.
 
While the Northern Territory remains the last jurisdiction without VAD laws, a Parliamentary committee tabled a report last month recommending the Government ‘draft legislation to introduce voluntary assisted dying in the Northern Territory’.
 
Log in below to join the conversation.


end-of-life care VAD voluntary assisted dying


newsGP weekly poll Do you think other jurisdictions should follow Queensland’s lead and allow all GPs to initiate, modify and continue ADHD medication for adults?
 
45%
 
43%
 
11%
Related



newsGP weekly poll Do you think other jurisdictions should follow Queensland’s lead and allow all GPs to initiate, modify and continue ADHD medication for adults?

Advertising

Advertising

 

Login to comment

Dr Roderick Andrew McNicol   16/10/2025 9:30:59 AM

Might be good if RACGP canvassed the wider membership on ethical issues . The comments quoted aim to be balanced but then state the RACGP position .


Paul   17/10/2025 9:23:05 AM

So these laws from 2017 that the Andrews government claimed “With 68 safeguards, the Voluntary Assisted Dying framework is the safest, and most conservative, in the world.” are now considered to be unsafe? Maybe this is that steady slope thing that was described which happens as soon as we allow something as unethical as euthanasia. Now these laws are just playing 'catch up' with the other states to 'bring them in line' with their legislation. The fact that the RACGP is so behind this is cause for concern. There is nothing 'safe' about euthanasia - someone is actively killed by the end of it.


Dr Thomas Anthony Shashian   21/10/2025 11:24:57 AM

I would have liked to see more debate and discussion amongst the rank and file of the RACGP membership regarding this whole issue. I am still unclear on what the majority of GPs feel about this matter and what is expected from the regular community GP working "at the coal face" when confronted with this issue while caring for the terminally ill, those afflicted with chronic debilitating or painful incurable illnesses, and those struggling with conditions that can make life intolerable due to pain and disability.