Advertising


Feature

Are fax machines and mailed letters ‘no longer best practice’?


Karen Burge


25/09/2026 2:00:00 PM

Amid recent controversy over ‘forgotten’ referrals, one GP expert says it’s time to abandon the old fax machine and move away from ‘snail mail’ to enhance patient safety.

An image of a group of paper files on a shelf.
‘A physical letter will get scanned and put into the record, so while it looks digital, it is in fact just a scanned document, which is unusable.’

At a time of heightened attention on the risks that come with paper-based health records, are they still relevant, and safe, in an increasingly digital world?
 
One expert says faxes, letters and other non-digital correspondence just aren’t meeting the standards of modern healthcare today, and GPs could benefit from exploring where improvements can be made.
 
The focus on outdated record keeping comes as media reports reveal up to 150 patients at Mildura Base Public Hospital (MBPH) had been left waiting for care for more than a year after boxes of paper referrals were forgotten.
 
It is believed one affected patient had since died after a GP’s referral wasn’t actioned.
 
Victorian Shadow Health Minister Georgie Crozier told newsGP these patients had been ‘left waiting while their health deteriorated’.
 
‘These 150 referrals sitting in a box are forgotten Victorians,’ she said.
 
‘They are patients who have not been triaged, have not been diagnosed and have not received the timely healthcare they deserve and need. There have been tragic consequences as a result.’
 
System-wide challenges
It’s a sad situation that has prompted discussion within the health sector about how best to ensure health facilities, including general practices, have modern systems in place for handling health information.
 
Two years ago, Federal Health and Ageing Minister Mark Butler spoke of his frustration that medical correspondence was still occurring over fax machine despite such major technological advances.
 
‘A technology first invented in 1964, 20 years before Medicare, is still frustratingly, maddeningly, all too common in Australian healthcare settings,’ he said.
 
While strides have been made towards healthcare digitisation, there is still much work to be done. And there are risks in failing to keep pace with change, as has been seen this past week at the Mildura hospital.
 
MBPH Interim Chief Executive Matthew Jukes confirmed to newsGP that the hospital is taking steps to address the cause of the problem and is ‘committed to modernising the way patient information is received and managed’.
 
This includes continuing work with the Department of Health and regional network to expand capability through the Electronic Medical Record program.
 
‘What happened should not have occurred, and we apologise and have empathy for the families affected,’ Mr Jukes said.
 
‘The hospital has taken actions to strengthen processes for receiving, tracking and managing referrals.’
 
Faxes and mailed letters
Dr Steven Kaye, Deputy Chair of the RACGP Expert Committee – Practice Technology and Management, said while tech advances are occurring rapidly, such as the growth of AI, paper-based communication is still an ongoing issue.
 
And the MBPH is a reminder of the need to ensure systems are digitised where possible.
 
‘Paper, faxes and other non-digital, unencrypted communication is simply no longer best practice and does not meet contemporary standards,’ Dr Kaye told newsGP.
 
‘Most practices will have an image-based system, so whether it is snail-mail letters that are still coming in, or whether it’s faxes, there’ll still be an element of essentially, image-based, non-digital communication that’s going on.
 
‘A physical letter will get scanned and put into the record, so while it looks digital, it is in fact just a scanned document, which is unusable.’
 
The same goes for faxes, even digital faxes, he said, which are still essentially a scanned document that arrives as a PDF but is ‘as equally non-usable as a scanned document in-house’.
 
This means doctors are limited in how they can used that data, Dr Kaye explains.
 
‘The ability to interrogate databases, either by questioning or AI, is severely limited by non-digital information,’ he said.
 
‘Digital documents can be receipted, logged, tracked and responded to. They allow data analytics and extraction to occur in a safe environment.’
 
For practices to move forward, Dr Kaye said governments must ‘delegitimise and remove the use of the fax’.
 
‘They need to remove the fax as a communication mechanism first up and remove paper communication, snail mail, secondly, because they’re just not the current standard. They’re not at the contemporary levels that we’re expecting.
 
‘It’s not going to happen by a goodwill. It actually needs to be legislated.’
 
Patient safety is a key driver and is ‘always front of mind’, he said.
 
‘Certainly, for everybody in the RACGP, patient safety is the key, with clinical outcomes as the positive reward. And digital mechanisms are the way to make that happen.’
 
In the MBPH situation, referrals to the hospital were understood to be paper based, exposing them to risk, whereas many new and larger hospitals now have digital referral processes, Dr Kaye explained, so that the digital data can be tracked and doesn’t get lost.
 
‘For example, Monash Health only accepts referrals into the hospital in their particular digital format, which is fantastic. It’s a wonderful change,’ he said.
 
‘It took a long time, and they had to be very strong and say, “we’re not accepting letters, we’re not accepting faxes, we’re not accepting any other form except for the one that we want to have”, and they made it well known.’
 
However, he points to some challenges that brings.
 
‘The problem is that they accept the referrals only one way, digitally, which is perfect, modern and effective, but when they send letters back to us, more often than not, it’s by fax, which is unbelievable.’
 
Moving forwards with a digital health strategy
The ability to have the advanced digital systems within the health sector talk to each other has been an ongoing problem, and one the Australian Digital Health Agency is working to address.
 
A spokesperson for the Agency told newsGP that My Health Record is available to clinicians and consumers to safely and securely share clinical information.
 
The Agency also continues to work with governments, software vendors and the health sector to improve interoperability and make digital health systems easier to use, better connected and more consistently embedded in everyday clinical care.
 
This includes practical education and support for healthcare providers, as well as work to improve the way clinical systems connect with national digital health infrastructure.
 
In the longer term, the Agency is working on Health Connect Australia ‘which will create a health information exchange between systems in the health ecosystem using agreed standards’
 
And while these are broader projects in the works, there are also steps individual practices can take to ensure their systems are efficient and effective in a modern digital healthcare age.
 
‘For general practices looking to modernise, the focus should be on practical changes that improve workflow and patient care, the Agency spokesperson said.
 
‘This includes reviewing how information is sent and received, using secure digital communication channels where available, checking whether practice software is on the latest version and configured to connect with My Health Record, ensuring staff understand privacy and access requirements, and using Agency education resources to build confidence across the practice team.’
 
Dr Kaye said the work of the Australian Digital Health Agency is positive.
 
‘The projects are great, and from an interoperability point of view, they’re trying to roll out connectivity across the health system, which is fantastic,’ he said.
 
‘What the government through Minister Butler, and the Digital Health Agency have been very proactive about over quite a number of years now is to progressively, relentlessly digitise health across this country.
 
‘But the rest of the system needs to follow suit. The smaller hospitals, the government departments, the outpatient departments, the private hospitals – they all need to follow suit, do the right thing and communicate digitally in encrypted fashion.’
 
Log in below to join the conversation.


clinical governance medical records medical software patient safety referrals technology


newsGP weekly poll Have you ever found out that a patient has previously failed to disclose their use of GLP-1 medicines to you as their usual GP?
 
56%
 
38%
 
5%
Related




newsGP weekly poll Have you ever found out that a patient has previously failed to disclose their use of GLP-1 medicines to you as their usual GP?

Advertising

Advertising

 

Login to comment

Dr Helena Andrea Smetana   26/09/2026 6:44:54 AM

With recent Open AI breach of Medicare data, non- digital documents have an advantage -if they can't be used by AI to extract information they also can't be hacked by AI.
I think the rush to digitise everything is premature given lack of international laws and frameworks to keep digitised data safe from AI agents. Should we not get security right internationally first? Use of AI as alluringly tempting it is to solve all our problems, actually may end up having significant unimaginable and unintended consequences including large scale data breaches that can impact us all.


Dr Bruce Stephen Flegg   26/09/2026 7:29:21 AM

Talk about shooting the messenger!! Excusing their own incompetent actions by blaming the system or the sender. These "experts" have obviously never used the ridiculous e referral systems which are just as likely to be ignored . Delays in the referral system are endemic. Just in the last month I have buried one patient and seen another suffer a large mi after waiting beyond triaged time-frames it is nothing to do with a faxed referral
The almost religious zeal to do everything on line dorsnt improve patient care . Try and deal online with Centrelink, insurance companies etc it might save some money. It doesn't improve experience


Dr Stephen Dick   26/09/2026 8:16:56 AM

Except for all the practices that cannot talk to Kiteworks, cannot open secure email, cannot open secure attachments, the list goes on, let alone archaic hospital systems. I have probably 40 log ins just to perform daily work. When do I get the efficiency gains?


Dr Philip Ian Dawson   26/09/2026 9:25:12 AM

While I agree with all that, and it certainly saves faxes that get lost behind or under the machine, electronic referrals also get lost "in the system". We have been sending electronic referrals for a couple of years to our local public hospital. I have a patient who had a heart valve replacement 2 years ago and was supposed to have a cardiology review and an ech after six months. I have sent 4 electroic referrals since and I got an apologetic call from a cardiologist recently who said we have only just "found the referral". He said he can now see the referral that was sent 2 years ago, which "wasnt actioned". To err is human, but to foul things up completely requires a computer! (Medicare hack, anyone?). We cannot get rid of letters, we have a number of older patients who have no email, they have a flip phone, and do not respond to texts.


Dr Milton Arthur Sales   26/09/2026 11:57:25 AM

Every system has its failures. With the recent lock down of the server database introduced by Best Practice and a change in google security, emails failed to send from our rooms. The debacle in our area health service's introduction of the SPDR record system, meaning that discharge summaries were not arriving, letters not sent, pathology arriving as a PDF not granular, so they can be forwarded to a referral, Inability to review pathology from our on site after hours gp emergency clinic, SENT referral - the only acceptable method of sending a referral to the John Hunter Hospital in Newcastle frequently being out of action and requiring hundreds of dollars of IT support at our end, our fall back is to print out the referral, and run it through a fax machine and you know if it doesn't work - it tells you!
We also have electronic faxing through gofer so anything sent to us gets entered into our inbox in our medical record to be actioned.
We need it all in case of failures


Dr Julia Elisa Gan   28/09/2026 3:52:39 PM

The My Health Record (MHR) has been called by some people “a shoebox of pdf. files”. The file contents are unwieldy to access and they have limited interoperability with general practice software.


Dr Neil David Stitt   3/10/2026 6:18:27 AM

Our only referrals that got lost were some of our GPs trying to send them digitally somehow -? heath direct-to places who appeared to have a correct address but lacked a green tick or something and the referrals went nowhere, The dinosaur here who gets reception to fax or email referrals has had no problems.


Dr Nicholas Kunzer   4/10/2026 6:52:27 AM

I suspect that moving to a system that has the ability to be analysed and scrutinised by regulatory bodies will end up being used by the government both for positive reasons such as research, but also for developing strategies to exercise more control over how we operate through the use of funding to create essentially kpis.
Setting up a referral system digitally that extracts information will also likely become a series of clicks that takes out the more nuanced information that is trying to be conveyed in the current letter based process.

A traditional referral letter allows a GP to say:
“I’m not entirely sure what is going on. This has evolved over the last six months, the patient is particularly anxious about it because her mother died of xyz, and although the symptom doesn’t look particularly concerning to me, there is something about the history that makes me uncomfortable. I’d appreciate your assessment.”
That contains a lot of information that isn’t represented digitally.