Advertising


News

‘Disappointing’: Bulk-billing loading allocation revealed


Karen Burge


15/08/2025 5:18:56 PM

The incentive will be split 50:50 between GPs and practices, but the RACGP has hit back, saying the Government ‘hasn’t listened’.

Mark Butler at a press conference.
Health and Ageing Minister Mark Butler announcing the bulk-billing incentive allocation at an Adelaide press conference.

GPs will be allocated only half of the new 12.5% bulk-billing incentive payment, leaving the RACGP ‘disappointed’ its advice and the voice of GPs have been ignored by the Federal Government.
 
From 1 November, practices which join the Bulk Billing Practice Incentive Program will need to bulk bill every eligible patient for every eligible service to receive the 12.5% loading.
 
While the RACGP pushed for GPs to be allocated 100% of that bonus, Health and Ageing Minister Mark Butler revealed on Friday that practices and doctors will share a 50:50 split, following ‘close consultation’.
 
A central plank in the Labor Government’s 2025 election campaign, the incentives are geared towards boosting the number of fully bulk-billed practices to around 4800 nationally – triple the current number.
 
But RACGP President Dr Michael Wright said the 50:50 incentive split is at odds with what most doctors want and could prove to be ‘a barrier for many practices and GPs who might otherwise have taken part’.
 
‘We made it clear to the Government that in order for its program to succeed, we need to make it as attractive to GPs as possible,’ he told newsGP.
 
‘Frankly, it’s disappointing that the Government hasn’t listened to our advice.
 
‘For years the college has been saying that GPs need to be able to charge their worth and to run a viable business. If these incentives don’t cover costs, then practices will keep their current billing practices.’
 
A recent newsGP poll of almost 1400 GPs revealed 71.6% are in favour of the full loading being paid to GPs, with individual arrangements then determining how the practice component is to be paid.
 
Only 9.7% want the incentive payment to be split 50:50 between the GP and the practice, and 10.8% said 100% of the payment should go to the practice, with the service entity distributing as agreed to the GP. Just under 8% are unsure.
 
‘We surveyed our members, and the majority told us that all of the incentive should go to the GP and then shared as per other generated income,’ Dr Wright said.
 
‘That would have been the simplest way to do this, and also the way that would be most likely to maximise GP opt-in to the program.’
 
But Minister Butler remains confident the incentive split is fair and will boost the rate of practices offering fully bulk-billed services ‘because those practices will be better off’.
 
However, he said buy-in is needed from both individual doctors and practice owners, ‘which is why we’ve gone with the idea or the decision to split the incentive evenly’.
 
‘That is the right balance,’ Minister Butler said.
 
‘Individual doctors should be rewarded for taking a decision to bulk bill every patient that they see, but also, we need to make this work for the practice themselves.
 
‘Although there have been arguments made to us that doctors should get all of the money or the practices should get all of the money, we think striking the balance that the money is split evenly between those doctors and the practices is the right decision.’
 
Mr Butler made his announcement on Friday from a South Australian practice, ForHealth, which operates healthcare services at more than 95 locations and is described as the largest bulk-billing general practice provider in the country. 
 
The group’s CEO Andrew Cohen said ‘almost eight out of every 10, probably about 70 clinics, will transition to 100% bulk billing by 1 November’. 
 
This includes the practice of ForHealth clinical director and Elizabeth-based GP, Dr Carolyn Roesler who said she is ‘excited’ about the new incentives.
 
‘We are all, as GPs and certainly in the urgent care space, very excited. We know this is an area of rapid growth,’ she said.
 
Spruiking the program, Minister Butler said doctors and practices are making the shift ‘because they know it is good for patients, and it is good for their bottom line’.

‘We know this investment will work,’ he said. ‘Because it has already worked for the patients the incentive already applies to – pensioners, concession cardholders, and families with kids.’
 
But Dr Wright said the new bulk-billing incentives are not going to be viable for everyone.
 
‘The college will continue to fight for increased Medicare rebates, particularly for longer consults, and to support practices regardless of whether they take up the current incentives,’ he said.
 
The Government says its landmark Medicare investment will mean bulk-billing GPs will earn more than average mixed-billing GPs, with a GP at a city practice that bulk bills every visit earning $5300 more than a mixed-billing GP that provides the same number of services.

The earnings boost is larger outside of city areas, with a GP at a rural practice that bulk bills every visit to earn almost $24,000 more than a mixed-billing GP, for providing the same number of services, Government modelling shows.
 
Log in below to join the conversation.


bulk billing bulk-billing incentive loading payment


newsGP weekly poll Do you ever use the Pay Doctor Via Claimant (PDVC) cheque system when billing patients?
 
4%
 
80%
 
15%
Related






newsGP weekly poll Do you ever use the Pay Doctor Via Claimant (PDVC) cheque system when billing patients?

Advertising

Advertising

 

Login to comment

Dr anon   16/08/2025 6:09:29 AM

This reminds me of when Robin Williams was performing regarding police in England who don't carry guns.

Stop!.... or I'll say stop again!

The RACGP are not only seen as impotent by the government, but actually are in effect.

We are losing everything under their stewardship.

Whereas pharmacy are gaining everything whilst maintaining archaic fully regulated anti-competitive ownership restriction rules.

When will GPs wake up? Unfortunately I am thinking never.

Imagine what nurses would do if they were screwed over like this?

Sure nurses we will increase your pay by 10% over the next 3 years, but we will give 5% (or 6.5% with a 30% service fee) to the hospital!

So weak it is not funny.


Dr Matthew James Harvey   16/08/2025 7:02:49 AM

The Minister for Idiocracy and the Department of Dumb Ideas have truly set in place a solid plan for GPs and practices to become wound up in KPIs, added compliance, and tax penalties that will ultimately only become fixed by practices having to actually employ GPs for form formalised partnerships under beneficiary trust arrangements because having the practice being paid for the work of GPs is not at all consistent with GPs tenanting practices and operating as autonomous independent business entities. What’s that going to look like? Have a look at Dr Glaucomflecken’s reels about Family Medicine and Health Insurance. Like that, except not funny.

Or we could just keep being independent business owners, practice high quality medicine for a fee that reflects its value, and tell the govt where they can shove their BBPIP.


Dr Joseph Dinesh Rodriguge Fernando   16/08/2025 7:20:01 AM

We have 3 Gps in my clinic
No one wants to go back to fully bulk billing system


Dr Sara Tahsin   16/08/2025 9:07:50 AM

Hello,
I am deeply disappointed by the government's decision to divide the bulk billing incentive loading between general practitioners and their practices. Many practices—particularly large corporate groups operating multiple clinics nationwide—already generate substantial profits by employing 10 to 15 GPs per location. These clinics typically operate under a bulk billing model, where GPs receive only 60% of their total billings.
If practice owners are entitled to 50% of the bulk billing loading, they stand to benefit significantly, while GPs continue to be undervalued for their work.
Should this 50-50 split proceed, I would like clarification on the following:
Will GPs retain their full 50% share of the incentive loading, or will it be subject to the standard 40% practice fee deduction applied to their total billings?
I would greatly appreciate further clarification on this matter.
Kind regards


Proud Specialist GP   16/08/2025 9:30:15 AM

Government uses your clinic as a 100% Public service, they fix how much you will make, they limit how many you can see BUT your are not employed by them, all the liability is on you, all costs to run are yours.
Very, very smart, indecent people.
They should try and do the same with the other public sectors. No one would accept such a bad deal.
SO sad a lot of us will fall for this ...


Dr Peter James Strickland   16/08/2025 10:24:46 AM

Any one or practice that agrees to this 50:50 split has literally got 'rocks in their head' --it is simply a means of controlling GPs, and using 'dollars' to control them. Just don't do it, as in the end you will lose your independence. The Medicare rebate is an insurance agreement with patients to pay part of the costs of seeing the doctor, and should be seen to be what it is; almost everyone can afford to pay something towards their medical costs to see their GP AND to attend EDs for minor ailments and injuries --that is how to have affordable and viable medicine for everyone incl, governments, patients and doctors.


Dr RM   16/08/2025 10:35:11 AM

I am really disappointed with the RACGP
Weak, weak
Our profession is being devalued by government and decimated by pharmacy guild and not standing up for our interests
Why would new graduates want to go into GP training ?
How about newsGP polls on more issues like ‘GPs willing to sign up to exclusive BB vs private fees?’


Dr Chiaw Lee   16/08/2025 11:25:24 AM

Well well, this goes to show how ineffective our College is. Not only it is politically not savvy unlike the Guild, and really, how can I even recommend our “specialty” as a viable career option in good faith to a wide eyed medical student?
Mark Butler’s electorate of Hindmarsh include some of the most disadvantaged suburbs in Adelaide, and if he thinks the corporate ForHealth is going to deliver what he has in store for us - we’ll just have to see how they’re able to recruit and retain GPs in that area, and if the PEP specialist program is even going to be successful for Adelaide’s Northern and Northwestern suburbs.


Forhealth GP   16/08/2025 2:43:41 PM

GPs still dont realise that since the Albo government came in all policies were to enrich the Forhealth group of practices.


Dr Mali Wasana Senarath Yapa Kulathunga   16/08/2025 2:48:13 PM

That’s why GP S of our practice said “ No” to going back to 100% bulk billing ever again


Dr Simon Holliday   16/08/2025 4:30:13 PM

This heralds the end of mixed billing. Practices may well have to decide to become fully private-billing or fully bulk-billing.
If the latter, there will be a natural commercial imperative to practice 6-minute Medicare, rather than medicine. Avoiding complexity will further dumb-down general practice and legitimately allow more powerful craft groups to expand their "scope-of-practice".


Disappointed GP   17/08/2025 7:20:56 AM

The RACGP has consistently demonstrated its incompetence in the fight for the welfare of GPs. It is now clear that the RACGP needs to step aside and pave the way for GPs to form a trade union. I am not aware of any other group of professionals being treated in this manner.


Rural GP.   17/08/2025 9:41:18 AM

Govt: Gps are integral to health care, we need you to keep patients out of hospital, ED and manage chronic conditions. We will look after you and need more of you
GPs: great!
Govt: But you'll be contractors, not get sick leave, study leave, holiday leave, work on a commission basis to enable your "employer" to avoid payroll tax.
Gps: right, off to work we go
Govt: But we will reduce chronic condition management fees, create UCCs so you will turn on your own, change DPAs to cause maldistribution of Gp numbers to the cities and outer suburbs where we can get more votes, advertise free Gp appointments for all!
Gps: Ok
Govt: we will give you first meaningful payrise in a decade but not keep up with inflation, you agree to bill only what we say, and we will pay incentives to your "employers" who tell you to bulk bill and did we say free consults for all?
Gps: Ho Hum, if only we had an organisation to advocate a better deal for us?
RACGP: sounds like just blowing air into paper bag, repeat


Dr Eric John Drinkwater   17/08/2025 12:06:43 PM

Not surprised … the corporates have a lot of influence. It’s time GPs stop pretending they are contractors when they are not.


Dr Javier Armando Campuzano Ortiz   18/08/2025 4:49:51 PM

Is actually the GPs' own fault when they accept working for corporate practices, all the practices should be gp owned.


Dr Ross Jeffery   19/08/2025 12:56:39 PM

The group’s CEO Andrew Cohen said ‘almost eight out of every 10, probably about 70 clinics, will transition to 100% bulk billing by 1 November’. This would require 100 percent of doctors in those clinics to agree to this. Is must bulk bill in your current contract? In my estimation any doctor currently generating more than 20% of their fees will be worse off by signing up. And if you are told to bulk bill you would be an employee. Will Mr. Cohen pay you super and holiday pay plus sick leave.


Dr Steven James Grillett   19/08/2025 3:55:12 PM

This was promoted as a Practice Incentive Payment / Initiative, then fact 1/2 has gone to the GPs is disappointing. IMO

The Practice makes the decision to bulk bill as a whole group, and should get the whole incentive. then individual GPs could negotiate/re-negotiate their terms/%billing with the clinic.

I think that 1/2 the incentive going going to the GP will make less practices do full bulk billing. I think the government will not get the outcome they were hoping for with this decision.


Dr Justin Alexander Edward Oughton   23/08/2025 4:30:35 PM

The left hand sure ain’t talking to the right. Seems it would have made more sense to work out the proportions first before offering anything: Work out what would make practice owners offer a better percentage to their GPs who bulk bill, and what percentage would make GPs switch to full bulk billing. Then roll it out as 2 separate packages. As I understand, GPs who private bill make about 20-30% more than those who are bulk billing everyone, so I guess this is the figure that would make GPs move over not 6.75%.
Practice owners already take between 25 and 35% of the GPs income for services. This is essentially raising their proportion another 6.75% at a penalty to the GPs who move over.
State payroll tax (5.45% in NSW) has meant that practice owners can’t dictate terms to their contractors or they will be seen as their employers.
Those GPs who are currently bulkbilling all their patients get no reward in this system if one doctor in the practitice privately bills. It’s A Dead Duck