Advertising


News

GPs’ role in elderly driver tests in focus


Anastasia Tsirtsakis


31/07/2025 5:03:37 PM

With the number of senior drivers more than doubling in 14 years, GPs’ role in conducting fit-to-drive tests is again in the spotlight.

Older man driving a car.
On 30 June 2024, there were 773,034 drivers aged 80 and over across Australia, compared to 384,118 in 2010.

A record number of drivers aged 80 and above are now driving on Australia’s roads.
 
According to Australian Infrastructure and Transport statistics released in January, there were 773,034 drivers aged 80 and over on 30 June 2024 compared to 384,118 in 2010.
 
Over this 14-year period, a breakdown of the data shows this trend is consistent across every state and territory.
 
The data is particularly pertinent, following two fatal accidents involving senior drivers that took place in Victoria just months apart, raising questions around the potential need for the state to introduce mandatory health checks for people aged 75 and over to renew and maintain a licence, similar to those in other states.
 
One of those fatalities was in Wantirna South – a crash which resulted in the death of a 59-year-old woman and a 60-year-old man, and the hospitalisation of their two-year-old grandson after they were struck by an elderly driver.
 
Speaking to 7NEWS, the boy’s mother called for change, while her partner said, ‘Victorian legislation is way behind’.
 
‘You can’t guarantee everyone can still drive when they are 70, 80, 90 years old,’ he said.
 
In the wake of the crash, Victoria’s Acting Premier Ben Carroll also announced plans to discuss the possibility of assessing elderly drivers’ fitness to drive.
 
But the prospect has raised some concerns, including among GPs.
 
Professor Dimity Pond, who is a GP with a special interest in cognitive impairment, told newsGP she is surprised by the number of elderly drivers on Australia’s roads, particularly given the risks that ageing poses to cognition.
 
‘We’re doing a very good job in health at keeping people alive for longer and, in many cases, with a good quality of life as well,’ she said.
 
‘But the risk of cognitive impairment or dementia approximately doubles every five years from the age of about 75.
 
‘And, of course, we know that people over the age of 80–85 have five or six chronic diseases on average and some of these things may impair or slow down their physical reactions when they’re driving too.
 
‘Age is a risk factor for driving problems [and] that’s really difficult to dispute.’
 
The Federal Government’s July report on road fatalities reveals that people aged 75 and over account for the greatest increase in deaths in the previous 12 months up to June 2025, with 23 more deaths – a 13.9% increase from 165 to 188.
 
Professor Pond, who practices in New South Wales where drivers aged 75 and over are required to undergo mandatory annual medical assessments to maintain their licence, believes self-assessment is inadequate.
 
While she acknowledges doctor-based assessments are not without their flaws, she says as people get older and develop some degree of cognitive impairment, they often lose insight into their driving.
 
‘If we rely on people self-reporting, there will be some that won’t do that and it might not be for wanting to conceal something; it might be because they simply don’t realise they’re not driving safely anymore,’ Professor Pond said.
 
Meanwhile, she notes there are numerous other factors that can make it hard for people to contemplate giving up their license.
 
‘I have actually reported a couple of people to the road traffic authority,’ Professor Pond reflected.
 
‘One particularly striking example was a patient of mine who I got quite a few comments from the patient’s neighbours and other staff about her poor driving. In the end, she went to another GP, and she apparently studied up on the memory test and got a high enough mark that she didn’t count as having dementia.
 
‘Then she got her license, and she drove into a tree at 60 km an hour. She was in hospital for six months, then she was in rehab for six months, then she went to the nursing home, and six months later she died. So, that was a very sad, and painful, end to her life.’ 
 
Over the years, Professor Pond admits to having lost patients over raising the issue.
 
While some GPs in Victoria may be apprehensive at the possibility of having to conduct annual driving assessments, she says it can actually help to provide some scaffolding around having what can be a challenging conversation with patients, and help to prepare them for what’s to come in the future. 
 
But given the significant life change that it can be, Professor Pond recommends GPs plant the seed sooner, rather than later.
 
‘On people’s 80th birthday, or around then, I say, “okay, and what are you going to do about driving?”,’ she said.
 
‘In my experience it takes two or three years before they are willing to give up their license; it’s a long process of getting adjusted.’
 
Log in below to join the conversation.


cognitive impairment driver’s licence fitness to drive health check older patients


newsGP weekly poll Has your practice decided to participate in the new Bulk Billing Practice Incentive Program?
 
16%
 
70%
 
4%
 
7%
Related



newsGP weekly poll Has your practice decided to participate in the new Bulk Billing Practice Incentive Program?

Advertising

Advertising

 

Login to comment

Dr Sohaib Nasim   1/08/2025 7:00:27 AM

What about providing solutions to the problems that arise if they stop driving. There is hardly any public transport in regional and rural areas. How are these people meant to do their day to day activities and be a part of their community. They will end up even more socially isolated.


SJ   1/08/2025 7:25:29 AM

GPs should not be solely responsible for assessing elderly fitness to drive in Australia. While they monitor general health, driving ability involves complex physical, cognitive, and functional skills that go beyond a typical GP consultation.

In some countries, fitness-to-drive tests for older drivers are conducted by the transport authority with standardised cognitive and on-road assessments — not by personal doctors. Many Australian GPs report discomfort with this responsibility due to limited training, time pressures, and the risk of damaging patient relationships.

A more effective approach would be for the Department of Transport to implement standardised assessments by qualified occupational therapists or driving assessors. This would ensure fairness, consistency, and improved road safety.


Dr Duncan   1/08/2025 9:59:01 AM

Driving should have a functional assessment - it’s not unreasonable to as drivers deemed medically fit to them pass a driving test.

We doctors shouldn’t be resistant to similar assessments for elderly doctors.


Dr Richard Newton   1/08/2025 10:30:43 AM

I agree that an objective OT assessment would be far preferable. As GP's we are horribly conflicted. It is very tough for us to "fail" someone if they have a stable degree of well compensated cognitive decline, but no accidents or incidents, local daytime driving only, often extremely essential for their and their partner's independence, quality of life etc. Especially when far more accidents are caused by young drivers. We are damned if we do and damned if we don't.


Dr Melissa Jane Cairns   1/08/2025 10:35:11 AM

The major problem with this is the lack of support available to elderly people when they do stop driving. On the one hand, we advise them to keep active and socially engaged to delay or reduce the onset of dementia, but on the other hand, unless they are wealthy or have an extended family close by and able to assist, they are not given adequate services or support to do this. Even getting to the shops or to the GP could become impossible. Access to aged care funding often takes over 12 months and even when it is in place the actual funds available are very limited and staff unreliable. 1/2 price taxi cards in Victoria are means tested and cut out for self funded retirees at a relatively low level of wealth. I see an awful lot of socially isolated pensioners and not wealthy self funded retirees, more and more as my colleagues stop BBing (I choose to only BB the other elderly) and the situation will only get worse.


Dr Slavko Doslo   1/08/2025 3:03:10 PM

YES the major problem is transport for non drivers
I European countries all drives 65+ has compulsory reaction test and medical
reaction test can be performed at Vic road office, if you fail no driving, that is crucial reaction time in stopping when someone is in front of you by mistake,
look on internet
https://www.topendsports.com/testing/tests/reaction-stick.htm
https://www.topendsports.com/testing/reactionmake.htm
and start testing your patients at time of care plan or health assessment and see how much "fun is that test" and you will find 80% failure rate, so 20 % will be fit to drive
but test yourself as well


Dr Gregory Michael Caddy   1/08/2025 3:23:20 PM

I am frequently surprised by how well patients do on their MMSE when their families report poor driving . I have changed to the Trail B test if I have any doubts about the patients degree of self care and find it picks up a lot more errors . Invariably the patients fail the practical OT test if they dont do well in the trail B
Personally over 80 yo I think everyone should need a yrly practical test through the Dept of transport . Doing it privately in WA can cost patients close to 1000$


Dr Raymond Bruce Hocking   1/08/2025 3:27:26 PM

The article is seriously misleading. It attributes various statements to Prof Dimity Pond including the following:
"Age is a risk factor for driving problems [and] that’s really difficult to dispute.’ and then states
"The Federal Government’s July report on road fatalities reveals that people aged 75 and over account for the greatest increase in deaths in the previous 12 months up to June 2025, with 23 more deaths – a 13.9% increase from 165 to 188." However this is the number of older people who DIED on roads - not number of deaths due to them!!

Moreover, the value of medical checks of all drivers over the age of 80 has been extensively assessed and found wanting. In 2008 a study by Langford et al of Monash University Accident Research Centre compared road crashes of older drivers in New South Wales which has mandatory medical checks, with road crashes by similar aged drivers in Victoria which does not have checks, and found no difference in crash rates.
Langford J, Bohensky M, Koppel S, Newstead S. Do age-based mandatory assessments reduce older drivers' risk to other road users? Accid Anal Prev. 2008 Nov;40(6):1913-8


Dr Peter James Strickland   1/08/2025 5:14:07 PM

I am 81 years old, and live in a rural area and still driving carefully and as well as I have for 64 years. As long as one has the ability and cognisance to drive to the conditions on the road at any time, and importantly is constantly aware (by mirror scanning) elderly people should not lose their licence. If I lost my licence simply because of age, and when I know I remain a safe driver, I would lose all my ability to look after a disabled wife, shop for food and other necessary items, and become totally dependent without support from my children (who live a long way from me), and lose a substantial sum of money on care and massively denigrate my children's inheritance unnecessarily. Like my father and older brother I will give my licence when I know I am incompetent to drive due to any serious infirmity, and have a plan in place for that possibility..


Dr Li-Chen Zhang   1/08/2025 9:12:52 PM

I think should speed up to approval for auto-electronic machine drive without human as driver. Due to elderly people in avoidable rapid increasing, if everyone over 75yo need driver's fitness check then there would be a huge burden for elderly people to maintain normal life style and would create lot of stress to them. Because in reality the public transport service is very limited and very inconvenience to most of our residents. With non-person drive, I believe it will reduce road accident, every car obey the traffic rules, less people will be killed on road. look current, everyday there are car accident! I wish when I reach this age, I could ride the car only as passenger and the car can send me where I need to go!


Dr Javier Armando Campuzano Ortiz   5/08/2025 11:28:30 AM

The assessment for elderly drivers should be the responsibility of the department of transport who should have their own doctor who specialises in doing driver assessment and has received standardised training and calibration for this, aided by an allied health team. It should not be the responsibility of the patient's own private practitioner. Every time I have to "fail" someone I have lost a relationship with a patient that has lasted years. Also they can find another practitioner who does not know them that well and get clearance when they are no fi to drive, which would not happen if the department of transport conducts the assessment. Again the government discharging its responsibilities on us, the same can be said about fitness for a firearm permit, the government should conduct this assessments.