Advertising


News

Health Minister launches federal pharmacy prescribing trial


Michelle Wisbey


13/03/2026 3:56:45 PM

The Federal Government pilot allows concession card holders to access pharmacy prescribed contraceptives – a shock move labelled ‘dangerous’ by an enraged RACGP.

Blister pack sitting on top of money.
Around 250,000 concession card holders aged 18–55 are expected to access the pharmacy prescribed treatments under the trial.

In a move that’s left the RACGP fuming, the Federal Government has jumped on the pharmacy prescribing bandwagon.
 
Making the shock announcement on Friday, it revealed that from January 2027, concession card holders will be able to access pharmacy prescribed contraceptives across Australia under a 12-month trial.
 
It also allows qualified pharmacists to treat uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs), without the patient ever seeing a GP.
 
Around 250,000 concession card holders aged 18–55 are expected to access the pharmacy prescribed treatments under the trial.
 
The Federal Government also revealed it is currently waiting on advice about a national standard for prescribing contraceptives, which the Pharmacy Board is expected to provide in July.
 
The reform was swiftly slammed by the RACGP, with college Vice President Dr Ramya Raman saying women’s health must not be treated as a pilot project.
 
‘This is unsafe policy,’ she told newsGP.
 
‘Missing one contraindication can change a life in minutes.
 
‘Convenience can’t come at the cost of a missed stroke. A new headache, visual changes, auras – that’s a red flag, not a refill.
 
‘I’m surprised to see this from a Federal Government that has a majority of women in its cabinet and caucus, yet women’s health is being “trialled”.’

RACGP President Dr Michael Wright echoed this sentiment, labelling the pilot ‘dangerous’ and saying he is ‘really exasperated’ by the announcement.  
 
‘More and more GPs and patients are hearing of people getting the wrong treatment or inadequate treatment when medication is offered to them from someone other than a GP,’ he told newsGP.
 
‘We have made clear to policymakers and regulators the increased risks to patients of these changes, and to our health system as care gets more fragmented.  
 
‘In 20 years, we will look back at the damage caused by this policy and by the weakening of the quality and safety standards within our health system – we should not be experimenting with women and their health needs.
 
‘Health policy needs to prioritise patient safety over access and convenience, and certainly above political lobbyists.’
 
But Pharmacy Guild of Australia National President, Professor Trent Twomey, has welcomed the move, saying that since the introduction of pharmacy prescribing for UTIs in 2020, around 145,000 women have received care from 4000 pharmacies.
 
‘Importantly, pharmacists will only deliver these additional services with the appropriate clinical training and within clinical protocols,’ he said.
 
‘Safety is, and always will be, central to pharmacy care.’
 
The Guild’s praise of the new trial comes after it spent more than $600,000 on political donations – the most of any healthcare body.
 
It also reportedly paid to attend the Prime Minister’s lavish birthday party earlier this month, spending up to $110,000 per year to attend such events.

Dr Raman said ‘policy must be evidence-led, not lobby led’, while also calling for the safety outcomes of such prescribing trials to be publicly available.
 
‘When the loudest lobby is also a major political donor, Australians deserve maximum transparency and independent evaluation,’ she said.
 
‘Real reform is strengthening the front door, not building side entrances with weaker guardrails.

‘Women deserve access and safety, not access first and safety later.
 
‘General practice stands ready to improve access, but we will not compromise on the standards that protect patients.’

Federal Health and Ageing Minister Mark Butler said the trial aims to deliver ‘women more choice, lower costs and better access to services and treatments’.
 
‘With most states now aligned and with the impending advice on a national standard for prescribing contraceptives, we want to ensure that access is affordable and equitable for women,’ he said.
 
‘Making treatment for uncomplicated UTIs easier and more affordable to access will make a real difference for women who need fast treatment without unnecessary cost or delay.’
 
The reforms are part of the Federal Government’s $792.2 million women’s health package, which was announced ahead of last year’s Federal Election.
 
The trial’s launch comes just days after the Victorian Government announced the state’s pharmacists can now prescribe the oral contraceptive pill, saving patients the ‘hassle’ of seeing a GP.
 
That decision has reportedly led to tension between Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan and Health Minister Mary-Anne Thomas, after Ms Thomas liked a social media post from RACGP Victoria Chair Dr Anita Muñoz criticising the announcement.

Log in below to join the conversation.


contraceptive Federal Government Mark Butler Pharmacy Guild of Australia pharmacy prescribing urinary tract infection UTI women’s health


newsGP weekly poll How confident are you in integrating Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander Health Workers and Practitioners into your practice in a culturally safe and sustainable way?
 
12%
 
22%
 
26%
 
21%
 
16%
Related





newsGP weekly poll How confident are you in integrating Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander Health Workers and Practitioners into your practice in a culturally safe and sustainable way?

Advertising

Advertising

 

Login to comment

Dr Elysia Thornton-Benko   14/03/2026 7:46:16 AM

It is increasingly evident, that policy-makers have absolutely no respect for our medical professional bodies, nor are they well informed. The support of further fragmentation, the oversimplification of clinical decision-making, the ignorance of the expertise and experience involved in prescribing. If any of these policy makers cared to discuss with an experienced clinician, they would be aware that primary care is not a straightforward flowchart that one follows. Knowledge is integrated, the implementation of knowledge and experience is nuanced and there are many higher executive function factors at play with what appears on the outside to be a simple decision!! Here we are advocating for high quality health care that Australians deserve, and yet it appears policy makers are taking significant actions to undermine that. Strange how the pharmacy guild often get what they want???? Mmmm $$$ When the Government wants to hear from those with the knowledge and experience, count me in!!


Dr Mina Rezkalla   14/03/2026 11:25:46 AM

So the Labor government has allowed pharmacist prescribing, launched dozens of Medicare urgent care clinics, is about to start allowing RNs to prescribe, has launched 1800 MEDICARE, is pressuring and campaigning for practices to become universally bulk billing…this is a full on assault on general practice and the RACGP and AMA seem to be standing idly by and watching it happen. I genuinely thought by voting for our current president that he’d be a leader with a bit more political influence and power as this was a big part of his campaign but lately it seems to be policy after policy being announced with the sole purpose of devaluing our speciality. Simply condemning the policy after it’s already been announced is sort of pointless? I’m honestly embarrassed to be part of this college right now


Dr Trevor Kemper   14/03/2026 4:08:31 PM

Why is this sort of lobbying not considered corruption?
It’s time for accountability from the government in terms of political donations biasing government policy. This is a bad policy decision clearly driven by personal and corporate financial interest, not health benefit.


Dr alias   19/03/2026 6:40:07 PM

Follow the money ... the pharmacy guild are a major donor, and no-one likes to pay to see a Dr anymore.
A reckoning will occur when a pharmacist is ordered to go to court and is sue'd for $20million, then it will all stop, I don't see there medical defence covering that much money.
the time is a coming


Dr Philip Anthony Atkin   21/03/2026 12:26:44 AM

It has become abundantly clear that government (state and federal) regard penmanship and/or keyboard proficiency as the chief skill required in prescription writing. The study of medicine and all those long postgraduate years in the hospital system, and the attainment of Fellowship are no longer necessary. No need to know how to examine a patient, no need to have acquired the observational skill and higher center processing critical for diagnosis, no need to be capable of forming a list of differential diagnoses, and no need to subsequently confirm that the patient is well following treatment. The KPI is no longer patient outcome, but patient turnover. The number of scripts written has become the outcome metric, not the success of treatment, nor the confirmation of diagnosis or the frequency or consequences of misdiagnoses, and certainly not the number of patients subsequently needing a doctor after treatment by a person who has never studied medicine.
I can't help wondering how many politicians will avail themselves of this service. I don't know any medical practitioner who would be happy to have a family member treated under this model of care.


Dr Rita Liana Ponce   21/03/2026 10:26:59 AM

Nothing is about patient care and health of the nation.
It has always been about "my party" needs to win the next election; anyway, the "lawmakers" are sure of their pension after they leave the ailing society, do they care about our patients at all? they care about the party's re-election for sure.
The good health minister has never listened to RACGP...


Dr Mary-Anne Lee   22/03/2026 11:47:12 AM

People value a commodity in their exchange for money. Tradies are paid for obviously fixing a toilet, building a cupboard etc. The thought processes that go into providing a OC-cardiovascular , migraine, blood clot etc is not appreciated by the patient, the govt. How many of our patients refuse to go back to the specialist because they see high charge for a yes or no answer. But hang on, they have validated the situation and given you the reassurance that nothing needs to change and continue as usual. The patient did not have that expertise clearance before the consultation.
Us GPs will have the "bread and butter" consults taken away but left with the hard ones. Will pharmacists be getting a MSCU before prescribing because how many UTI symptoms turnnout not to be.When they see us because of resistance to the antibiotic given, we wont have the Sensitivities to be able to confidently change the antibiotic. The bain of us GPs' lives is to fish for the past management information