Advertising


News

MP pens targeted letter pressuring clinic to bulk bill


Michelle Wisbey


12/03/2026 4:19:09 PM

The letter, addressed to a local general practice, expresses ‘disappointment’ that it has not switched billing models.

Checking letter in mailbox.
The RACGP has produced a downloadable letter template for practices to use when responding to MP-direct communications.

A letter sent by a Labor MP to a general practice in their electorate has raised concerns about pressure tactics being applied to clinics not adopting the Federal Government’s preferred bulk-billing model.
 
The letter, seen by newsGP, was addressed to a Victorian practice and signed by a Federal politician, saying they had ‘received correspondence from constituents who utilise your clinic’.
 
‘My constituents have shared their disappointment that [clinic’s name] is currently not a fully bulk-billing clinic,’ the letter reads.
 
‘I encourage you to move toward a 100% bulk-billing model as it would better serve the community and your patients.’
 
The letter goes on to encourage the practice to use the Federal Government’s bulk-billing calculator to ‘more accurately estimate the financial impact of adopting a fully bulk-billing model’.
 
It is a targeted campaign RACGP President Dr Michael Wright says follows sustained advocacy from the college to educate politicians about the realities of general practice.
 
‘When we were at GPs@Parliament last week, we spoke to many politicians to explain to them why practices might be bulk billing, but also why practices weren’t taking up those billing incentives,’ he told newsGP.
 
‘And that’s because for many practices, those incentives don’t cover the costs of providing care, and that’s not going to change with pressure from a letter from a politician.
 
‘We’ve explained to politicians that if they’re really worried about this, what they need to do is increase the Medicare rebates for longer consults, because that’s where the pressure is.’
 
As of last month, almost 1300 general practices had switched billing models under the Federal Government’s flagship Bulk Billing Practice Incentive Program (BBPIP), with Australia’s bulk-billing rate sitting at 81.4%.
 
It comes amid a significant Federal Government movement to have practices take up its BBPIP, including the launch of a widespread advertising campaign.
 
Federal Health and Aged Care Minister Mark Butler has also warned he will intervene if practices do not participate in his plan, saying he is ‘not just going to sit by and let some markets really prohibit members in their community from being able to access bulk-billed visits’.
 
‘I’ve been really clear with doctors’ groups, some of which have been a little sceptical about this in the lead-up, that they should not underestimate our determination to achieve this,’ he said previously.  
 
In response, Dr Wright called on politicians to visit a general practice so GPs and practice managers can explain exactly why they may not choose to bulk bill all patients.
 
‘The Government’s measures have not been designed to work for every practice, and no one benefits if their practice is shut because they’re unable to stay viable,’ he said.
 
‘The college will continue to support practices however they bill, and that’s in the best interest of their patients and their communities.
 
‘If any politician wants to know why a practice has a particular billing policy, they can talk to me or the RACGP and we’ll be able to explain in detail.’

The RACGP has produced a downloadable letter template for practices to use when responding to MP-direct communications.
 
It calls on MPs to visit general practices to talk through the diversity and complexity of patients cared for, the time and resources required to provide care, and ‘why the current policy settings do not work for our patients or our team’.
 
The Labor MP was contacted for comment.
 
Log in below to join the conversation.


Federal Government GPs@Parliament


newsGP weekly poll Have you seen an increase in vaccine hesitancy among your patients in the past three years?
 
55%
 
33%
 
9%
 
1%
Related




newsGP weekly poll Have you seen an increase in vaccine hesitancy among your patients in the past three years?

Advertising

Advertising

 

Login to comment

Somewhat retired pundit   13/03/2026 7:03:26 AM

The MP should be reminded of Section 51 (xxiiiA) of the Australian Constitution prohibiting civil conscription. If the MP feels so strongly about it, will they argue for civil conscription to be allowed with a referendum?

Having in the latter part of my career been under the freezing of Medicare rebates by the Rudd government which was then continued by the LNP for many years, I would not trust a future government not to freeze Medicare payment levels or to extend payment times. Until there are legislated automatic indexed rebate increases like those for pensions so the Minister of the day cannot invoke “special circumstances” or “budget emergency” to freeze payment levels.


Dr Mauricio Diaz Jaramillo   13/03/2026 8:39:48 AM

The stance of the minister in this matter will be catastrophic to the profession of Medicine. I would urge the college and the medical community as a whole to acknowledge any ambivalent postures and produce a show of unity and determination in defence of the medical workforce as it fundamentally needs to maintain a high standard of care and ensure it's viability through dignified work rights.


Dr Bethany Reynolds   13/03/2026 9:29:16 AM

Cartel behaviour from the government attempting to price fix the services of private businesses.
We’ve set our fees based on our costs. if the government wants to provide “free healthcare” then they need to cover the full costs


Dr Slavko Doslo   13/03/2026 9:45:02 AM

I will consider
after they recalculate GP loss of income due to freeze, correct yearly indexation , and after ALL ministers reduce they salaries by 50% ( I believe that is the difference in our loss
Thank you Minister


Dr Donal Reed   13/03/2026 12:07:47 PM

Why not name the MP ?
I do worry that the RACGP is actually in support of the government on this matter

We are not employed as civil servants. This is just the government trying to “employ “ us without all the wonderful benefits of being one.
RACGP should be looking after the health of the population not playing politics


Stop being passive!   13/03/2026 1:54:15 PM

Please stop being nice to these politicians especially Mark Butler! . GPs could be a powerful political force, yet we have been so passive that others feel free to say and do whatever they like. Mark Butler, long seen as closely aligned with the Pharmacy Guild, has consistently spoken about GPs in this way. He is not our friend. How can he justify talking about our profession like this?

If we stand united, we could hold him politically accountable, even make him fight for his own re-election. But if we remain as passive as we have been in the past, he will continue handing more and more of primary care to his allies in the Pharmacy Guild, leaving us with a fragmented healthcare system that will become even worse than the NHS.


Dr Javier Armando Campuzano Ortiz   13/03/2026 2:04:45 PM

That letter is nothing short of offensive the MP has no right to intervene on how a private business is operated. I think is time that the college stops being week.
If the government does not change its tone we should go in a 2 o 3 day strike and see how the emergency departments and the community handle it. This is a socialist government, therefore a strike seems like very socialist response. Or we can all just agree and 100% of as go entirely privately billing reducing the bulk billing rate to zero so the people have to go and deal directly with the government. They will be able to do nothing about it unless we are conscripted, and so far The Australian constitution forbids it. Apart from the inherent stress of the GP work we should not be putting up with government threats.


A.Prof Christopher David Hogan   13/03/2026 3:30:36 PM

"If you would like to visit our clinic, I would be very happy to explain why we charge our current level of fees"


Dr Kay   14/03/2026 9:46:34 AM

Medicare is nothing but a public health insurance scheme run by the Federal Government. The medicare rebate that a patient receives is a matter between the community and their insurance provider - the Federal Government. There is a need for mass public awareness campaign to make communities lobby MPs to increase the rebate they receive from their insurer "Medicare". It is convenient to keep consumers of this insurance scheme in the dark and place blame on the medical profession.
Could the RACGP launch such a mass awareness campaign -
E.g. "Ask your MP not your GP" for a higher medicare rebate?


Dr Brian George Wall   14/03/2026 6:35:58 PM

I arrived in Tasmania in 1973 after working in a developing part of the world and in hospitals and GP in UK. Over 70% of GPs in Tassie at that time were refugees from the NHS of UK. Most warned of what would happen and has happened when Medibank was introduced. Unfortunately, we do not live in Utopia and many people will always want something for nothing with no appreciation of the costs. Would this Labour M.P. be prepared to take a 40% pay cut? I finally retired in2023 because I was tired of the lack of respect and increasing administration demands which has nothing to do with the quality of care. One past Minister of Health appeared to equate convenience with high quality medical care!!


Dr Peter Callel James Joseph   15/03/2026 3:49:10 PM

How can it be legal for the government to discriminate against patients, to whom the rebate is due, on the basis of the implied contract they have with their GP.
Patients are entitled to the same rebate and the government should not be able to discriminate against them.
The government is not the employer of doctors, yet it is manipulating rebates to enforce its will on doctors, by disadvantaging their patients.
Time for a fight for goodness sake.
PCJ Joseph AM FAMA FRACGP,


Dr Balaji Venu Madhav Pillalamarry   15/03/2026 7:22:37 PM

I do not understand how the PHI premiums have had increases of 5-6% from 2012 for a few years and an average of over 5% from 2012 to 2026 due to inflation and rising costs, but the medicare rebates increase only 1.2 % average. If we were to accept this as our salary.. what is the benefit?
Also, how does the same pay work for everyone irrespective of location and outgoings?
I do not understand how these guys even get elected to office without this basic thinking.


Dr R   18/03/2026 7:32:21 AM

I understand the philosophy behind universal bulk billing, after all these MPs are acting in the interests of their constituents who are struggling with cost of living pressures and expect good quality ( near perfect) healthcare provided free by the government. However these patients and their MPs don’t understand that the Bulk billing model can only work for the 6 minute Short consult style of practice. As is happening in the clinics who have adopted this model of care. For the rest of us it would be disastrous especially if we have large numbers of complex, Chronically ill patients. One potential solution would be to rebate all longer consultations the same as the CDM plan or review, with legislated indexation of rebates. In addition allowing practices to charge for consumables and increasing the rebates for procedures such as suturing etc