Advertising


News

Pharmacists call for ‘self-determined’ scope


Karen Burge


4/11/2025 2:48:12 PM

Pharmacists would be allowed to autonomously prescribe all Schedule 4 and 8 medicines if a new plan from the nation’s leading pharmacy bodies is adopted.

Pharmacist speaking to a patient.
‘We need to be putting patient safety first – not profits over patients,’ says the RACGP President.

Peak pharmacy groups have joined forces to step up their push for prescribing rights, issuing a joint plan to empower pharmacists to prescribe medicines autonomously.
 
The proposal put forward includes an enhanced role for ‘endorsed pharmacist prescribers’, along with patient access to Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) subsidies for medicines prescribed by pharmacists.
 
However, the RACGP warns of the dangers that come with the proposal, including the risk to patients as well as a potential for conflicts of interest.
 
The model was detailed in an open submission to the Pharmacy Board of Australia by the Joint Pharmacy Organisations (JPO), which comprises Advanced Pharmacy Australia, the Pharmacy Guild of Australia, and the Pharmaceutical Society of Australia.
 
It comes just weeks after the Pharmacy Board announced it had begun work to establish an endorsement for scheduled medicines for pharmacists, ‘supporting a consistent, safe, and nationally coordinated approach to pharmacist prescribing’.
 
The JPO proposal centres on autonomous prescribing: ‘where a health professional undertakes prescribing of any scheduled medicine within their individual, self-determined, documented and authorised scope of practice, based on completion of an accredited training course’.
 
This, it states, will be delivered in appropriate collaborative relationships with the patient and all other members of the healthcare team.
 
‘The Joint Pharmacy Organisations’ submission, which should be adopted by the Pharmacy Board in full, would enable qualified pharmacists to administer, obtain, possess, prescribe, sell, supply or use Schedule 2, 3, 4, and 8 medicines after completing an approved course,’ it stated.
 
The pharmacy organisations also called for collaboration with governments to ensure patients can access their PBS subsidies for medicines prescribed by endorsed pharmacists – ‘removing financial barriers and improving equity in healthcare’.
 
But RACGP President Dr Michael Wright, who last week met with the Pharmacy Board where the topic was raised, expressed concerns about the proposal.
 
‘There was lots of conversation, as well as at a roundtable discussion with the Pharmacy Board, around possible education planning, but I do have some real concerns here,’ he told newsGP.
 
‘There seemed to be a lack of understanding about the potential risks associated to expanding prescribing to all medications.
 
‘I was particularly concerned about the lack of regard for the dangers of S8 medications; also, for the dangers of fragmentation and the confusion caused by multiple people potentially providing similar types of care.
 
‘Also, there was acknowledgement, but little discussion about how to deal with the thorny issue of conflict of interest that pharmacists face in profiting from the sale of medications they would prescribe.’
 
Dr Wright said ‘we need to be putting patient safety first – not profits over patients’.
 
‘We’ve seen the dangers of putting profits over patients in the telehealth space, and we have to make sure that this doesn’t happen through this pharmacy prescribing process,’ he said.
 
Behind the pharmacist push is the view that enabling pharmacists to prescribe autonomously will improve access to timely care, reduce pressure on general practice and emergency departments, and ‘enhance continuity of care through integrated, patient-centred services’.
 
The submission also points to the role this could play in addressing the maldistribution of GPs across the country, particularly impacting rural, regional, and remote areas.
 
Pharmacy Guild of Australia National President Professor Trent Twomey said pharmacists are ready to do more.
 
‘Expanding the range of services provided in pharmacy, in line with pharmacists’ skills, training and experience will reduce GP wait times and non-urgent visits to the emergency room’, he said.
 
‘Nationally endorsed pharmacist prescribing will improve access to treatment, relieve pressure on doctors and hospitals, and deliver better value for taxpayers.’
 
Log in below to join the conversation.


continuity of care GP prescriptions pharmacy prescribing scope of practice


newsGP weekly poll Do you think other jurisdictions should follow Queensland’s lead and allow all GPs to initiate, modify and continue ADHD medication for adults?
 
45%
 
43%
 
11%
Related




newsGP weekly poll Do you think other jurisdictions should follow Queensland’s lead and allow all GPs to initiate, modify and continue ADHD medication for adults?

Advertising

Advertising

 

Login to comment

Dr Francisco Rodriguez-Letters   4/11/2025 7:17:03 PM

I'm feeling both melancholic and relieved about my choice to quit rural GP work forever around a year ago, after a difficult 14 years. For me it was clear, as the cliche goes: The writing's on the wall. General Practice is dying. It's been attacked by both federal and state governments on both sides of the political divide, the pharmacy guild; the media, amongst others. And as for the new universal bulk billing incentives....I only see this as a long term bait-and-switch operation. From my perspective there's been little to no forethought before gleefully signing up to the scheme. In another 5 years there's likely to be no sign of indexation once again, but this time there will be so many bulk billing practices that nobody will be able to reintroduce fees. The aim is the shape the zeitgeist of Australia to scorn fee for services in General Practice. As my grand-mama told me... "If you sup with the devil you must use a long spoon"


Dr Timothy Richard Shaw   5/11/2025 7:32:49 AM

The argument pharmacy has used for doctors not owning pharmacies and dispensing was that the pharmacist provided a double check and this increased patient safety.

Surely with the continued push for pharmacist prescribing this old arguments is void and the RACGP should push the federal Government to remove the protected market of pharmacies and open it up to doctors also. Also removing the geographical restrictions on licences would also enhance competition.

This would put the pharmacy guild to decide which position was more
Correct


Dr Michael Lucas Bailey   5/11/2025 9:46:48 AM

It needs to be reinforced that there is already an approved, accredited, regulated pathway for any pharmacist to become a prescriber. It’s a medical degree and medical practitioner registration with AHPRA. Prescribing isn’t just writing a script, it’s just a part of the management of a medical conditions that also require investigation, diagnosis and ongoing management. Prescribing shouldn’t be separated from overall management of medical conditions and the way to learn to manage medical conditions is to become a doctor.


Dr Shiamala Suntharalingam   5/11/2025 11:16:50 AM

Safety for patients is paramount
Pharmacistz with 10years experience should do gp training and then be precribers


Dr Gaston Hubert Marie Boulanger   5/11/2025 2:03:50 PM

Capitalism will undermine science and patient care, in pharmacist prescribing . Making money is more important than what’s best for patients.


Dr Nalini Rao   5/11/2025 2:22:16 PM

"The submission also points to the role this could play in addressing the maldistribution of GPs across the country, particularly impacting rural, regional, and remote areas." This will make no difference to Rural and Remote area. In my MM6 location, the Pharmacy closed 5 years ago, I've had to obtain a special license and run the pharmacy as well as be the GP and VMO for Emergencies. I very much doubt any of these pharmacists will go to such locations as there is no money to be made, these are empty words!


Dr Camilo Guerra   5/11/2025 2:52:24 PM

Lol! Consider it done! If the pharmacy guild (sponsored by big pharma) and the government likes it, the RACGP will not stop it from happening. Sad but true . The RACGP has the numbers… yet it seems unable to lobby effectively somehow.


Dr Christopher Roy-Chowdhury   5/11/2025 4:46:10 PM

I have no objection to supply repeat script for schedule 2-4 drugs as long a patient/client see his GP annually for routine check up and has routine necessary blood test/ x-rays and all other investigations necessary as decided by specialist and GP.
I am a retired GP and member of RACGP for over 45 yeras.


Dr Rolf Tsz Kit Tsui   5/11/2025 7:22:41 PM

As my learned colleagues have already mentioned, medical assessment is an art and a science which requires extensive training, certifications, examinations and clinical exposure to be expert diagnostician. After which, there are many forms of treatments - from doing nothing to both non pharmacological and pharmacological. The ideal "training program" is a Medical Degree. All interested, please apply.


Dr Bahman Ranjbar   6/11/2025 12:28:20 AM

I strongly oppose allowing pharmacists to independently prescribe S4–S8 medications. Patient conditions change constantly and require proper medical assessment, physical examination, and follow-up to ensure safety. Prescribing is a medical responsibility supported by years of clinical training and diagnostic expertise. Pharmacist prescribing risks misdiagnosis, delayed treatment, polypharmacy, and fragmented care. If the government’s goal is cost reduction and convenience, a safer alternative would be to allow GPs to dispense medications directly. This would save patients time and dispensing costs while ensuring appropriate treatment by the clinician who assessed them. GPs and pharmacists must work collaboratively, but extending prescribing beyond medical training undermines patient safety and healthcare quality.


Dr Tired of this bullshit   7/11/2025 12:29:31 PM

It is not "potential" conflict of interest. It is "conflict of interest".
And prescribing is not just printing on a piece of paper !
and no pharmacitst are not doctors and not trained to do a job of a doctor.
and no it is not going to reduce any wait times etc, it is just going to create more problems and infact complex problems that someone else ( GP specilaists and non GP specialists ) will have to sort!