Advertising


News

RACGP ‘blindsided’ by controversial new IMG fast-tracking


Michelle Wisbey


1/05/2024 4:33:32 PM

Eligible overseas doctors will be granted upfront registration from the Medical Board, in a move labelled an ‘assault on the medical colleges’.

Blurry road.
The program is set to begin in October 2024 for GPs, and in December for other specialties.

Internationally trained medical specialists will be handed a fast-tracked registration to work in Australia, under a new plan from AHPRA’s Medical Board.
 
Announced on Tuesday, the process will see eligible GPs, anaesthetists, obstetricians and gynaecologists, and psychiatrists recognised for their overseas qualifications and granted upfront registration.
 
The Board’s plan aims to see more medical specialists working on the ground in Australia, as rural and regional patients continue bear the brunt of healthcare worker maldistribution.
 
Consultation has now begun with specialist colleges, including the RACGP, to identify the comparable overseas qualifications.
 
However, RACGP President Dr Nicole Higgins has been left ‘seething’ by the decision, which goes directly against stark warnings about the dangers of bypassing the colleges and their accreditation processes.
 
‘I was blindsided by the lack of respect shown by the Medical Board when we had been working closely with them in good faith to ensure good outcomes,’ she told newsGP.
 
‘They have released this whilst we’re still undergoing consultation and it’s deeply disappointing, it’s disrespectful to the process.
 
‘We can’t trade off safety for numbers – our community deserves better than that.’
 
Once it is up and running, the new process will sit alongside the existing assessment systems, and those granted registration will have initial conditions placed on them.
 
The Medical Board said if a doctor has an eligible qualification, they will not need to apply to the college for an assessment; instead, they will be able to apply directly to the Board for registration.
 
The specialist will then work under supervision for six months while completing requirements including cultural safety, and an orientation to the Australian healthcare system.
 
Upon meeting these requirements, they will then be granted unconditional specialist registration.
 
Fellowship of a specialist medical college will not be an automatic outcome of the new pathway.
 
The decision comes after last year’s Kruk Report recommended a more streamlined process for international medical graduates to work in Australia.
 
Following this, the RACGP committed to simplifying many of its assessments and requirements.
 
‘Throughout the Kruk Report review process, we had strongly come out warning the Government of the unintended consequences if they didn’t listen to the colleges,’ Dr Higgins said.
 
‘The RACGP has already adapted and responded to the Kruk Report, and we want to ensure that we make things as easy and as streamlined as possible.
 
‘We get bums on seats, and we do that from day one, and those doctors are supported so that they’re safe and their communities are safe.’
 
Medical Board member and Specialist IMG Taskforce lead Dr Susan O’Dwyer said the Board is ‘pulling out all stops’ to make the changes safely and effectively.
 
‘The goals of an expedited pathway would be to have more well qualified, specialist IMGs to better meet the Australian community’s medical needs with quicker specialist registration for qualified and competent SIMGs and with fewer barriers,’ she said.
 
‘There should be greater certainty for SIMGs that they will be registered and able to practise in their specialty, making Australia a more desirable destination.’
 
The program is set to begin in October 2024 for GPs, and in December for anaesthetics, obstetrics and gynaecology and psychiatry.
 
But Dr Higgins said with further consultation between the colleges and the Medical Board still set to take place, the RACGP will continue to fight against the plan.
 
‘To say I’m furious as an understatement – our profession is under threat from so many burning fronts at the moment,’ she said.
 
‘This is an assault on the medical colleges’.
 
Log in below to join the conversation.



AHPRA IMGs International Medical Graduates Kruk Report Medical Board


newsGP weekly poll In the past year, have you seen an increase in the number of younger patients asking about vaping?
 
30%
 
64%
 
4%
Related




newsGP weekly poll In the past year, have you seen an increase in the number of younger patients asking about vaping?

Advertising

Advertising


Login to comment

Dr Robert William Micallef   2/05/2024 8:33:27 AM

At the same time the medical board wants local gp’s to jump through hoops to complete the ridiculous CPD program to supposedly ensure the safety of the public they are happy to open the door to overseas graduates without regard to public safety.


Dr Bryan Sean Connor   2/05/2024 8:49:09 AM

AHPRA does what the government wants. No amount of cosying up to the Labor government is going to give the RACGP the respect of asking its opinion, never mind a veto over the health minister's opinion.


Dr Cameron Thomas Hoare   2/05/2024 10:38:41 AM

This sounds like a process to Put boots on ground with little oversight.
I do not want to be cared for or have my patients cared for by a Specialist whom has not met australian standards.


A.Prof Christopher David Hogan   2/05/2024 12:42:30 PM

This is not safe- for the doctors involved, for their patients & for all the other IMGs who have tried so hard to meet the standards expected of Australian GPs .
APHRA's Medical Board clearly has NO understanding of Australian General Practice how it deals expertly with complexity & the uncertainty of patient presentations, conflicting & often irrelevant guidelines for people with multiple comorbidities & an obscenely contorted formal & informal health system both public & private.
I have references for these statements if they are needed


Dr Aditi R. Chandak   2/05/2024 5:21:53 PM

I came as an IMG with a specialist training, completed another specialist training with FPM ANZCA, have worked in Australia for 10 yrs now, still denied any specialist qualifications from ANZCA nor do they recognise my overseas qualifications. This is why you have shortage of drs. This new ‘fast track’ process seems a slap and a joke to existing struggling hard working drs such as me.


Dr Abdul Ahad Khan   2/05/2024 6:08:30 PM

" However, RACGP President Dr Nicole Higgins has been left ‘seething’ by the decision, which goes directly against stark warnings about the dangers of bypassing the colleges and their accreditation processes " - GREAT STATEMENT !!!
How come Nurse Practitioners & Allied Health Professionals are allowed by the RACGP to function as DEFACTO GPs, by-passing the Colleges Acreditation Process ?

These Overseas MBBSs only need to work for 2 - 3 years in Hospitals under Supervision, rotating through various Disciplines - ED / O & G / ICU / Medical Wards / Surgical wards etc. - exactly like the Overseas Medical Graduates did in the early 1970s - there was no RACGP then, thank God !
All of these Overseas Medical Graduates in the early 1970s, have turned out to be EXCELLENT GPs without the need to jump over all of the Hurdles introduced by the RACGP - I am one such OVERSEAS MEDICAL GRADUATE, who has become a very successful GP. without the ' help 'of RACGP.
DR. AHAD KHAN


Dr Suzette Julie Finch   3/05/2024 3:34:36 PM

Dear Dr A Chandak Australia has a doctor shortage due to Australian health & education policies. We as a 'high-income country' shouldn't "steal" doctors trained in their own countries' education & health systems for their own country's health system needs. This would be an uncommon problem if Australia produced the health workforce it needed. The issue would then only be for doctors who immigrated primarily for family migration issues & not those who are filling a need that Australia should be addressing for itself.
Dr A Khan respectfully you forget NO-ONE needed to pass the RACGP requirements in the 1970s or 1980s. In approximately 1995 or 1996 the Federal Government brought in the "HURDLES" making College Registration a requirement for a Provider Number access to Medicare rebates or apply for "Grandfather" recognition. ALL doctors- Australia & IMG- had to be registered with a GP College. This was why there was a National Day of Action!


Dr Abdul Ahad Khan   3/05/2024 6:27:36 PM

The founding of the RACGP was not for the Benefit of GPs - the RACGP has never stood up for the GPs at the Coalface, unlike the AMA which has stood up for the Specialists.
Dissolving the RACGP is the Solution.
The Govt. is the PAYMASTER of the RACGP & hence this Body is Powerless.
The Govt. is not the PAYMASTER of the AMA


Dr Abdul Ahad Khan   3/05/2024 9:52:12 PM

Suzette, there is no need for all the Hurdles imposed by the RACGP - a compulsory 2 - 3 years Internship Rotations in various Departments in Hospitals under Supervision will be enough for IMGs to be competent GPs.
Dr. Ahad Khan - a Competent GP


Dr Kenneth Adams   4/05/2024 11:29:34 AM

It appears that the government wants more doctors and are willing to bypass the colleges. To get ahead of the curve, the RACGP should offer full membership to all doctors regardless of initial training. Scrapping the KFP would be a great start. They could lower fees with more members. They could then require mandatory cpd requirements consistent with educational standards on a rotating basis to ensure all members are up to date including the elder doctors. They could limit cpd to RACGP courses on GP learning. 50 hours a year should more than enough to cover all the content in three years . In a system where the government bypasses college membership, voluntary membership at reasonable rates that keeps you up to current standards would be much better than a system where you are forced to join in order to attract a fair Medicare rebate. The strength of numbers could alleviate doctor shortages and improve our political capital.


Dr Lorenzo Susino   4/05/2024 12:47:23 PM

This is once again the Federal Government pulling strings of AHPRA to solve the doctor shortage across not only Rural and Remote regions but also metro regions. This undermines all the processes that specialist colleges have been put in place to ensure that Doctors have the skills and training to practice safely and competently.
How about AHPRA and the Government put policies in place to support the existing work force. How about giving prospective doctors a reason to enter a field. I know as a GP I struggle to sell General practice to Students.


Dr Patrick Fergal McSharry   18/05/2024 2:43:20 PM

Wow, further denigration of us as Primary Care Physicians . As an IMG only 4 years here ( and still on a 482) , I can't believe that people are saying here in Australia that you can be a goid Primary Care Physician with spending 3 years in an Australian Hospital ( never mind not getting a specialist Qualification. ( Being a CCFP - AM) with the CFPC) it is absolutely essential that an IMG gets intensive training in the Australian Primary Health Care system. The supervisory system in place now seems very odd compared to the Canadian System


Dr Patrick Fergal McSharry   18/05/2024 2:44:42 PM

Also , what do ACCRM think about this?