Advertising


News

RACGP ‘working to find a way forward’ amid assignment of benefit concerns


Karen Burge


5/06/2026 4:21:43 PM

The college says it is in constant communication with the Department to resolve GPs’ concerns with the upcoming changes.

An elderly person with a doctor.
‘We have shared those concerns of the membership with policymakers, and we are working to find a way forward.’

Incoming changes to the way Medicare benefits are assigned to patients are continuing to cause concern for many GPs, particularly compliance in residential aged care settings.
 
In response, the RACGP says it appreciates GPs’ ‘significant concerns’ and is continuing to actively lobby the Federal Government for a practical solution ahead of next month’s start date.
 
From 1 July, a changed assignment of benefit process will commence for Medicare bulk-billed services, impacting the way patients assign their Medicare benefit to a provider in exchange for not incurring any out-of-pocket costs.
 
Next month’s changes include the need for an electronic or physical signature to be collected from the patient, or responsible person, as part of the assignment of benefit, and a requirement for practitioners to keep that completed agreement for two years.
 
Consent can be obtained before or after a service is rendered (pre- and post-assignment) but must be prior to a claim being submitted. It is also required for every individual bulk-billed service (known as episodic assignment).
 
When a patient is unable to sign an assignment of benefit agreement, such as those in aged care settings, an assignor (namely a parent, partner, carer, relative, person with power of attorney or friend) could be asked to sign the agreement on their behalf.
 
However, many GPs remain worried they won’t be able to bulk bill these patients in situations where a compliant representative is unable to sign on their behalf.
 
RACGP President Dr Michael Wright said the college is in ‘constant communication’ with the Department of Health, Disability and Ageing (DoHDA) ‘trying to fix this problem and to find a way forward that’s fit for purpose’.
 
‘We’ve heard the concerns from members saying that these changes will not be fit for purpose and will drive GPs away from providing care for nursing home patients – those have been made and heard loud and clearly,’ he told newsGP.
 
‘We’re very concerned that GPs feel, due to concerns of potentially being non-compliant with Medicare, that they will either stop visiting nursing homes or shift to private billing.
 
‘We have shared those concerns of the membership with policymakers, and we are working to find a way forward.’
 
However, Dr Wright said DoHDA recognises ‘there’s a real problem here’.
 
‘This transition risks having major impacts on access to care for patients in residential aged care facilities,’ he said.
 
‘There are also major changes to the workflow of general practice that have to be thought about before changes are implemented.’
 
A spokesperson for the DoHDA said ‘the Department appreciates that moving toward a compliant workflow will be a transition for the sector’ and it is taking stakeholders’ concerns on board.
 
‘The focus is to ensure providers understand the options for patient assignment of benefit,’ a spokesperson told newsGP.
 
‘It has been a longstanding requirement under the Health Insurance Act 1973 that for bulk billing to occur, a patient (or another person on behalf of a patient as appropriate) must assign their Medicare benefit to the provider in exchange for not incurring any out-of-pocket costs.
 
‘The Department is continuing to explore issues raised by stakeholders and possible solutions that could support practices to adopt compliant solutions.’
 
These AoB requirements, the Department adds, are designed to safeguard vulnerable patients’ rights, ensuring decisions are made in their best interests while maintaining appropriate privacy protections.
 
‘These settings are also broadly consistent with existing requirements and strike a balance between enabling access to care, protecting patient autonomy, and ensuring GPs can bill.’
 
To prepare for the updated requirements, practices are urged to:

  • consider when and how patients assign their benefit. This could be during booking, check-in, the consultation itself, or post-visit (using paper or electronic methods such as SMS or email).
  • ensure patient contact details are up to date and understanding preferred communication channels. Existing check-in and registration processes can support this.
While a specific form is no longer required, Services Australia will make template forms available. Providers can also design their own, provided all required information is included.
 
In other steps, practices can engage with their software vendors to understand compliant electronic assignment options that can streamline administrative processes as well as visit the Government’s Frequently Asked Questions, with further supporting information to be available soon.
 
The spokesperson added that the Department is working to finalise regulations to support enduring assignment of benefit for patients who are registered in MyMedicare or receive services from an Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation or Aboriginal Medical Service.
 
‘Enduring assignment of benefit will require an agreement to be signed once (by a patient or their assignor), for ongoing and future services from a preferred clinic/practice,’ they said.
 
To help GPs navigate the new rules, the RACGP has set up a webpage with information and resources.
 
Log in below to join the conversation.


assignment of benefit bulk billing compliance MBS Medicare


newsGP weekly poll Will the 2.6% MBS indexation applied from 1 July influence the way you bill?
 
100%
 
0%
 
0%
Related





newsGP weekly poll Will the 2.6% MBS indexation applied from 1 July influence the way you bill?

Advertising

Advertising

 

Login to comment

Dr Joshua Hatch   6/06/2026 8:17:19 AM

If the ceo is actively lobbying the department for a solution in aged care (which if so then it’s hardly making waves), how about he make himself known to the Aged Care specific interest group?


Dr Janice Faye Sheringham   6/06/2026 10:49:54 AM

So the Department, in its wisdom, AND to save THEIR money, will no longer provide assignment of benefit forms that comply with THEIR requirements? AND we have to go back to storing records - both paper AND electronic - for 2 years? Yes we need to store financial records for tax audit purposes for even longer, but these AOBFs attach to every SERVICE, not just every VISIT, so the form on each and every occasion must include every item bulk-billed as before, so how specific must they be? And every time a descriptor changes, we will now have to update our proformas to ensure they comply, or our software must be paid to modify their programs? Nice deflection of costs from the agency providing the rebate - AGAIN! Being a de facto Medicare Claims office should NOT come at the provider’s expense! You were warned YEARS ago nit to fall into this trap - but here we are. The screws are tightening even further so break the grip now, or become full-time GOVERNMENT employees!


Dr Ruby Curtis   6/06/2026 11:08:27 AM

There are already so many barriers to providing care to residents in aged care facilities , this new assignment of benefit process may just be the nail in the coffin for this GP who has provided over 30 years of visits to the nursing home patients in her rural town.


Dr Richard Simpson   6/06/2026 7:30:56 PM

After 40 years of providing services to aged care, I am seriously considering walking away. This is a debacle.


Dr Anh Nguyet Le   8/06/2026 10:32:06 PM

This Medicare rule is such a big impact for my patients esp elderly patients, use their table phone for telephone consultation , they live far away from us and they are not English speaking patients, how can they sign the AOB for telehealth .Those patients are loyal and relying on me for their health care for more than 20 years, How can I explain to them that we are not allowed to bull bill telephone consult with them due to the new medicare rule of AOB . They must be very upset and we also feel guilty of not providing the care they need esp urgent care. Based on the duty of care, we have to take urgent telehealth consultations but not being able to bulk bill them, we could not cope with the financial burden.
GP career now is not a good career path, nurses, allied health personals, pharmacists are competing with us as well .


Dr Allan Roy Ingpen   13/06/2026 7:57:31 AM

So let me get this straight, we are asked to bulk bill as many people as possible but told to get their signed consent for this and have to keep two versions (electronic and hard copy) for two years, increasing expenses for the practice.
What if your patient changes their mind and refuses to sign?
Let’s level the playing field a bit- do the same at hospitals. So the patient must sign over their benefits prior to treatment.
And make it law that no elected official (PM, government, mayor, etc) is allowed to have private health insurance, use a private health facility or be treated as a VIP, hopefully that will open eyes.
For GPs bill everyone privately, we have two fee structures- Medicare benefit rates with a bit more added on to cover expenses - so patients can pay and claim that full amount back, and a fully private fee. Again, levelling the playing field.

We already have so many organisations watching what we do and how we do it, this just seems like more job creation.


Dr Steve Hambleton   14/06/2026 6:12:06 PM

I hope all of these comments are read by the department who seem to want us to bulk bill everyone all the time..... My practice manager of over 20 yrs experience asked me to consider no longer bulk billing any telehealth at all, as it would reduce the admin costs that these rules impose.