Advertising


News

Equip GPs to ease strain on non-GP specialists: Report


Jolyon Attwooll


16/06/2025 4:16:09 PM

A Grattan Institute analysis exposing ‘extreme fees’ among non-GP specialists says more support for general practice could avoid 68,000 referrals every year.

Doctor taking payment
Out-of-pocket costs for non-GP specialists have risen by 73% in real terms since 2010, according to the report.

General practice should be part of the solution to address spiralling non-GP specialist fees and widespread access issues, according to the Grattan Institute.
 
The recommendation comes in a new report, ‘Special treatment: Improving Australians’ access to specialist care’, which was published by the independent policy thinktank on Sunday.
 
It estimates that allowing GPs to get advice from other specialists more easily would avoid 68,000 referrals each year, as well as $4 million in out-of-pocket costs for patients. 
 
‘GPs and other specialists would be paid for their time at a cost of $26 million a year,’ the report’s authors wrote.
 
They describe the existing system as having ‘few easy options’ for getting a second opinion, with GPs reliant on their own professional network or needing to find the right support independently.
 
‘And [GPs] are not directly paid for time spent planning or discussing complex care with other doctors,’ the report says.
 
‘As a result, GPs may refer patients to specialists even when they could manage their care more quickly, more cheaply, and just as well, with some quick advice.’
 
Dr Rashmi Sharma, Chair of the RACGP Expert Committee – Funding and Health System Reform, sees merit in the proposal.
 
‘Better coordination and collaboration helps everyone,’ she told newsGP.
 
‘We would welcome measures that support GPs to manage more care and reduce referrals where possible.
 
‘However, it’s important GPs are appropriately remunerated for this work.’
 
Highlighting how out-of-pocket costs for non-GP specialists have outstripped increases in other Medicare services by 73% in real terms since 2010, the Grattan Institute’s report also exposes huge fees commanded by some specialities.
 
Researchers estimated that more than one in five patients who saw a non-GP specialist in 2023 was charged an ‘extreme fee’ – defined as more than three times the Medicare schedule for the service on average.
 
Psychiatry costs were among the highest, with out-of-pocket fees reaching $670 for an initial consultation among those defined as charging extreme fees.
 
However, the Grattan Institute report found more dermatologists charging extreme fees than any other specialty, with almost half falling into that bracket.
 
The authors also estimated that almost a million people put off non-GP specialist care each year or avoided it all together, with nearly half of them doing so due to the cost.
 
As a result, missed diagnoses and delayed treatment risk causing ‘avoidable suffering’ as well as placing additional pressure on hospitals, they wrote.
 
The Grattan Institute researchers estimate that free clinics run by public hospitals currently only provide a third of all specialist care and criticises their wait times as ‘often far too long’.
 
‘In many parts of Australia, wait times for urgent appointments are months longer than clinical guidelines recommend,’ they said.  
 
‘These problems have festered because the system has been running on autopilot.’
 
They described non-GP specialist care as ‘a postcode lottery’, with people in the worst-served areas receiving about a third fewer services than the best-served areas – an issue they say ‘disproportionately’ affects rural communities.  
 
Rising chronic disease
The ongoing rise in chronic disease provides another key reason for urgent action, according to the policy researchers.

‘GPs can manage most aspects of ongoing patient care,’ the report states.
 
‘But as chronic diseases increase, care is getting more complex, making it harder for GPs to diagnose and decide on treatment plans without advice from specialists.’
 
For Dr Sharma, the analysis reinforces the logic behind the long-held college advocacy position to encourage longer consultations.
 
‘We have been calling for more funding to support GPs in providing care to patients with complex and chronic health conditions,’ she said.
 
‘There needs to be a rebalancing of the MBS to support this type of care.’
 
Dr Sharma also emphasised the importance of trust from non-GP specialist colleagues for GPs to manage care in the community, as well as more support for implementing shared care models – and highlighted the issue of clinical handover back to general practice.
 
‘Many times GPs will send patients for referral, and they will go to the clinic but are not discharged back – this creates fragmentation as well as clogging up clinics, reducing appointments available for new patients,’ she said. 
 
The Grattan Institute report, meanwhile, called for legislation to curb ‘extreme fees’, including publishing a list of ‘extreme-fee specialists’ and laws allowing government to claw back excessive charges.
 
The thinktank’s Health Program Director Peter Breadon said the current system means some patients face a choice between long wait times or over-inflated costs.
 
‘We think those fees are far too high,’ he told the ABC. ‘There’s no justification for them. There’s no evidence that the doctors charging extreme fees are providing better care.’
 
The report also recommends the establishment of a national health workforce planning body, as well as greater investment in public non-GP specialist clinics.
 
Dr Sharma agrees action is required to address access and equity issues.
 
‘Every funding model has its benefits and flaws, and we need to carefully consider any changes to avoid unintended consequences,’ she said.
 
‘We need to consider the findings of this report in line with the various other reforms currently being enacted across the health system.
 
‘We want to see all Australians able to access public outpatient services when they need them. We’ve long called for efficiencies in the outpatient system such as better triaging of referrals.
 
‘We’re also supportive of GP Liaison Officers being rolled out across all jurisdictions to improve collaboration and communication across hospital and primary care services.’
 
Log in below to join the conversation.
 


Grattan Institute healthcare funding MBS Medicare non-GP specialists


newsGP weekly poll How often do you use conversational AI tools, such as ChatGPT, Gemini, or Copilot, within your general practice?
 
8%
 
16%
 
10%
 
65%
Related



newsGP weekly poll How often do you use conversational AI tools, such as ChatGPT, Gemini, or Copilot, within your general practice?

Advertising

Advertising

 

Login to comment

Dr Farid Zaer   17/06/2025 8:13:16 AM

Many, if not all, GPs have training in more than one area of medicine, and yet if patients are not referred to the correct specialists, they may be reprimanded and punished. This would also include the patient being non-compliant and disobedient. One case that I had was a patient with marked prostatomegaly symptoms, and a mildly elevated PSA for 2 years, he refused to get a prostate US or return for a PSA. testing. He told me he was petrified of cancer, and seeing meant spending $93 for each visit. When his PSA doubled, he was promptly sent to see the urologist ($350/-). His wife logged a complaint to AHPRA, and she was never in attendance. A NSW surgeon asked me to apologise and move on. Based on the International classification, I am triple board certified, Pathology and Microbiology, Family medicine and Integrative medicine (metabolic, nutritional and regenerative medicine).


Dr Peter Angus MacIsaac   17/06/2025 11:34:31 AM

Incentivising hospitals and GPs to enable GPs to work in specialy OP clinics has many advantages including knowledge transfer from the specialist to GP sectors and flow on to primary care capacity to manage conditions that would otherwise need referrals. No a new idea, that is how things were done in the past prior to GPs being eased out of most public hospital roles


Dr Md Monirul Haque   17/06/2025 11:47:16 PM

Many specialist GPs would be able to do many of the non GP specialist job and some of them are doing it already, but not recognized, remunerated or respected. Many quick referral to non GP specialist costing a lot to the public and waiting times area high for patients. Many of the problem like doing steroid injections in joint under point of care ultrasound, Use of point of care ultrasound (POCUS) prescribing Roaccutane for acne, diagnosing and prescribing patients with Autism, ADHD, managing perimenopausal and menopausal health. Diagnosing and Treating Type 1 Diabetes, treating obesity, etc can be managed by trained specialist GP with extended Skill on Advanced Family Medicine . It needs a structured curriculum and training on Advanced Family Medicine open for both post RACGP and ACRRM fellow to get Certified Family Physician as a Fellow of Advanced Family Medicine ( FAFM- RACGP). Time has come to attract special item number by FAFM.


Dr Matt Harvey   18/06/2025 6:19:18 PM

"GPs are not .. paid for time spent planning or discussing complex care" - Only if you're assuming the GP bulk bills, or you're assuming the GP doesn't set their fees to factor in time spent outside of consultation on a patient service beyond time spent meeting the MBS item descriptor.
"GPs may refer patients to specialists even when they could manage their care more quickly, more cheaply, and just as well" - yes - but they could only do it just as well if they spent as much time managing complexity; and would it be cheaper? Perhaps, but only if they under bill or bulk bill under the current MBS rebates -the pathway to insolvency.
"it’s important GPs are appropriately remunerated for this work" - absolutely. If the GP is a tenant GP, the GP sets their own fees. The Medicare rebate is the patient's.
"the importance of trust from non-GP specialist colleagues for GPs to manage care in the community" - trust requires quality care, quality care takes time, time is money.