Advertising


News

Almost 80% of GPs concerned over urgent care model: Poll


Anastasia Tsirtsakis


14/03/2025 3:28:23 PM

While some GPs have expressed support for the clinics, many are now raising concerns about the model’s potential to negatively impact and strain the already limited GP workforce.

A doctor bandaging a patient’s arm.
Since urgent care clinics were established in 2023, 1.2 million Australians have accessed care.

Over the last two years, urgent care clinics (UCC) have become a part of the Australian healthcare landscape, with 87 clinics established by the Federal Government – and there could be more on the horizon.
 
Earlier this month, the Labor Party promised to invest more than $600 million to establish a further 50 clinics if re-elected in the upcoming Federal Election.
 
The RACGP has been critical of the model and whether it is the answer to Australia’s health system challenges, citing concerns over cost effectiveness, staffing issues and continuity of care.  
 
Federal Health and Aged Care Minister Mark Butler said he is aware that the college ‘doesn’t particularly support this model’ but that ‘their members do’.
 
However, a recent newsGP poll, run earlier this month, suggests otherwise.
 
Asked whether they think the Government’s promise to rollout an extra 50 UCCs will place ‘additional strain or negatively impact the already limited GP workforce’, 79% of the 1536 respondents voted ‘yes’. Only 12% disagreed, and 8% said they were unsure.
 
RACGP President Dr Michael Wright said while GPs are ‘broadly supportive’ of the urgent care concept, it is clear to see they are ‘really worried’ about the current program’s impact on the viability and workforce needs of general practice.
 
‘What we see here is the majority of our members are concerned about the impact of these centres on the limited GP workforce,’ he told newsGP.
 
‘The college has been calling for an evaluation of these centres before they roll out further, to make sure that they’re providing value for money and not damaging existing practices by taking away limited funding and GP workforce.’
 
The Federal Government says an assessment is underway but has yet to indicate when it will be completed and reviewed by government.
 
A poll run by Healthed in November 2024, found 70% of the 795 GPs surveyed support UCCs in principle. However, a follow up survey, run by Healthed earlier this month, backed newsGP’s poll findings.
 
Of the 1204 GP respondents, 65% expressed support for UCCs in general, but only one quarter supported the initiative outright.
 
A third said while they support the idea in principle, modifications are needed, while 40% oppose the new clinics altogether, with concerns over staffing issues, cost effectiveness and a lack of evaluation, as well as continuity of care and triaging.

While Dr Wright said urgent care has a place, he highlighted that it is something every general practice can be equipped to do.
 
‘Funding would be better directed to allow existing practices to expand their hours and operations. That would be a better use of this funding,’ he said.
 
The RACGP president did however acknowledge that there are several members who work in UCCs, and said the college’s concerns are not a criticism directed at them.
 
‘They’re providing important care to their communities. I’m not criticising them with these comments,’ he said.
 
‘We need to make sure that this model is sustainable and fit for purpose in the Australian healthcare system.
 
‘Fundamentally, most GPs are supportive of the concept of urgent care and see that if they are properly structured, they have the potential to support the care offered by existing practices.
 
‘But that’s the important bit – it needs to support existing practices, not suck up resources that would otherwise go to maintaining the viability of existing practices.’
 
If Labor’s election promise comes to pass, Minister Butler has said that new UCCs will be established in each state and territory, with specific locations to be determined by Primary Health Networks, which will conduct an open tender process ‘at arm’s length from the government’.
 
‘What we do is we put out a call for general practices in the region who want to take their practice to the next level,’ he said.
 
‘We’re not about building new buildings. We’re about tapping into the existing connections and experience that existing general practices have.’
 
In the case that a practice is successful, they receive additional funding from the Commonwealth to be able to satisfy UCC program conditions, including being open seven days a week and having the relevant equipment.  
 
The Government’s aim is for four in five Australians to live within a 20-minute drive of a UCC.
 
Since their establishment, 1.2 million Australians have accessed a UCC, receiving fully bulk-billed non-life-threatening urgent care, with a third of patients under the age of 15.
 
Log in below to join the conversation.

 


bulk billing continuity of care federal election fragmented care Medicare UCCs urgent care clinics


newsGP weekly poll Health practitioners found guilty of sexual misconduct will soon have the finding permanently recorded on their public register record. Do you support this change?
 
59%
 
25%
 
14%
Related




newsGP weekly poll Health practitioners found guilty of sexual misconduct will soon have the finding permanently recorded on their public register record. Do you support this change?

Advertising

Advertising

 

Login to comment

Dr Greg Saville   15/03/2025 1:21:09 PM

The general public and most GP’s support urgent care clinics. When you ask a question like “ Do you think the Government’s promise to rollout an extra 50 urgent care clinics will place additional strain or negatively impact the already limited GP workforce?” Of course, you are going to get a majority yes response. Duh! Why not ask, “Do you think the general public appreciate seeing a GP for free in the evening instead of attending an emergency department, or an under qualified pharmacist, for common low acuity problems (mastitis, UTI, fractures, sprains, burns, lacerations, etc.)?”
Why the RACGP is against our younger GP’s earning a decent hourly rate (often with benefits) instead of the measly $43 bucks a patient is beyond me. The only GP’s against urgent care clinics are practice owners or owners of private urgent care clinics (slugging patients $160 for a UTI!). Work at an UCC for $250 an hour or for 60% of billings at a GP clinic, you decide.


Dr Arshad Hussain Merchant   15/03/2025 11:33:22 PM

GP practices are small individual businesses, who have ABNs and follow all rules and regulations under business regulations… So, why RAVGP even talking about UCC which is federal government initiative to shut down GP practices with better publicity… RACGP needs to address the business needs and stop being political scapegoat


Dr Robyn Swinbourne Fried   16/03/2025 9:09:53 AM

I am perplexed by the concept of Urgent Care Clinics. They are funded Federally to address inadequacies within the hospital (State funded system). Surely this is a recognition that the State funded hospital system is inadequately funded by the Feds?
Also, having a system which is augmenting the State hospital system being staffed doctors who are usually Federally funded adds to the confusion for me. And, in our climate of inadequate GP numbers, there appears to be an anomaly in the Feds using this workforce to fund the UCC model which is really part of the State run hospital sector.


Dr Kimaleen Lynette John   16/03/2025 4:25:15 PM

I wonder if they look at the cost per patient they look at the fact that some patients that arrive need suturing, an abscess lanced, a non Medicare billable plaster. None of these have a billing structure that makes it compatible for a GP service to provide.


Dr Eric John Drinkwater   17/03/2025 8:56:53 AM

I have been in Primary Health care practice since the mid 1980's and had extensive experience in the various iterations of after hours services, including Divisions, private corporations (including clinics run by Geoffrey Edelsten, or Ian McGoldrich), various "24 hour clinics" around Melbourne, clinics attached to public emergency departments, fabricated "fast track clinics" within public EDs to scam Medicare funding for State funded responsibilities ... in my opinion none have provided the potential and quality of a patient's own GP clinic which has over the decades been devalued and disempowered by successive Governments and health care economists.

Look at the experience of the failed "Super Clinics" of the past, look at the experience of the very expensive nurse run clinics in Canberra.

Adequately support GP clinics to provide their own after hours when possible.

... and if you want GPs to assist with the public emergency department disaster, employ them inside the ED.


Dr RM   17/03/2025 1:30:34 PM

i work in UCC and standard GP.
They pay $200ph 8am - 8pm, $250ph 8pm-10pm weekdays
$250ph weekends
They pay via ABN and there are no 'additional benefits' such as sick leave, annual leave or superannuation.

The main difference is in the afternoon shifts in particular there are lots of kids with coughs/colds/sore throat, asthma etc that would normally go to ED.
There is a lot of suturing that would normally require ED
Day shifts 8-3pm there is a LOT of non-urgent stuff that patients come for to avoid gap fees as they want a free consult.

eg. I have had a sore shoulder for 'about 2 weeks'
I have 'worsening anxiety'
I had a "MRI knee done yesterday and want to get the result - which was ordered by their GP' but wanting to avoid a consult fee for discussion of this result

This abuse of urgent care is worsening. UCC should be a weekend/after-hours service only