Advertising


News

Call for views on scope of practice


Jolyon Attwooll


11/09/2023 3:23:40 PM

A review into scope of practice, which seeks to ‘unleash’ the potential of the health workforce, is open for feedback.

GP consultation
A recent survey suggests many GPs feel they could expand their scope of practice.

Views are being sought for an independent review commissioned by the Department of Health and Aged Care (DoH), which could ultimately lead to changes in the way the primary care health professionals work.
 
Last month Professor Mark Cormack, a former allied health professional and senior health official, was appointed to take charge of the ‘Unleashing the potential for our health workforce review’.
 
Feedback has now officially opened, with a deadline of 16 October for submissions.
 
The review covers the work of GPs, nurses including nurse practitioners, pharmacists, midwives, allied health practitioners, First Nations health practitioners and workers, and paramedics.
 
According to an announcement from Federal Health and Aged Care Minister Mark Butler on Monday, the review will look into evidence about health professionals working to their full scope of practice in primary care, including any obstacles that might prevent from doing so.
 
‘Making sure Australia optimises its health workforce across a stretched primary care sector will improve health access and equity across all communities – including regional, rural and remote areas,’ the DoH announcement stated.

Minister Butler said that many in the health workforce have not been working to their full potential ‘for too long’.
 
‘Whether it is nurses, pharmacists or allied health professionals, in a global health workforce shortage we need everyone working as close as possible to the top of their scope,’ he said.
 
‘This is the first of many opportunities for input into this important review.’

The coverage of the review so far has tended to focus on potential scope of practice changes for other health professionals such as nurses and pharmacists.
 
However, according to a survey earlier this month, almost three in four newsGP readers (72%) believe there is potential for GPs to expand their scope of practice.
 
Professor Mark Morgan, Chair of RACGP Expert Committee – Quality Care (REC–QC), says GPs should be helped to do more.
 
‘What GPs really need to enable them to work at full scope of practice are accessible, real-time sources of high-quality information and health pathways,’ he previously told newsGP.
 
He has also highlighted specific legislative barriers he believes are holding GPs back, and cited the college’s position statement on shared care as having more detail on potential scope of practice changes for general practice.
 
‘For those patients who have complex long term medical conditions and require specialist teams to help look after them, there’s a great scope for GPs to work more closely with those people, and be able to adjust treatments within ranges, and help make that much more efficient and patient centred,’ Professor Morgan said.
 
‘It’s a shift towards [other specialists] really working on top of their scope, seeing new presentations that need their expertise – and not reviewing stable long-term conditions, but to allow that task to be done where it’s much more appropriate, which is with the GP.’
 
An interim report is due by the end of the year, followed by a final report with recommendations and an implementation plan in the second half of 2024.
 
More information about the review is available on the DoH website.
 
Log in below to join the conversation.



general practice scope of practice


newsGP weekly poll Which RACGP request would you most like the Government to fund in the upcoming Federal Budget?
 
25%
 
7%
 
56%
 
4%
 
6%
Related





newsGP weekly poll Which RACGP request would you most like the Government to fund in the upcoming Federal Budget?

Advertising

Advertising


Login to comment

Dr Michael Lucas Bailey   12/09/2023 6:42:00 AM

I see discussion of “scope of practice” as a bad thing for GPs. The concept comes from allied health and nursing. As a doctor my experience is that I always here it regarding things not being done. “That’s outside my scope of practice.”. As GPs, ie registered specialists, we should be self identifying the tasks we do and don’t do. One of the great things about our profession is that we are taught and ethically required to do be self aware. In an emergency we where there is nobody else we will do more. When we have support of our colleagues we will refer. Can you imaging cardiologists being defined in what they do because it is outside their scope of practice rather than being aware of their own skills and special interests and specific experience.

Lets not confuse PBS prescribing restrictions and some limits on what we can formally diagnose with ADHD and call that scope of practice.

If we adopt a defined scope of practice it will lead to out hands being tied more tightly.


Dr Olga Elizabeth Randa Ward   12/09/2023 11:12:04 AM

I'm very keen for some of our potential and returned to city Rural Generalists to be able to NOT lose their scope of practice- they are our valuable RG teaching resource people and they are our skilled locum force. They are also the ones struggling to maintain their obstetric experience, their theatre time and their ED currency, as well as their considerable skills with inpatient management (adult internal medicine advanced skills, paediatric advanced skills). You can't be what you can't see. If the medical students are not able to see these skillsets in their urban hospitals as well as their rural placements, they don't know they could learn this stuff. Not all of them will go for a rural term and be inspired by location and practice, but they sure as heck are inspired by inclusive generalist practice. And not every crook patient needs to be admitted by a left big toe surgeon in a tertiary hospital...
Agree with above re PBS and MBS restrictions on requested tests and scope