Advertising


News

GP concern over new pharmacy assistants course


Michelle Wisbey


15/03/2024 2:29:36 PM

The training was launched as part of the Queensland Community Pharmacy Scope of Practice Pilot, but the RACGP says it points to a ‘lack of capacity’.

Close up of pharmacist hands holding medicine.
Pharmacy assistants can now enrol in the three-hour, $99 course online.

The RACGP has raised concerns about a new mandatory Pharmacy Assistants Course, aimed at complementing the Queensland Community Pharmacy Scope of Practice Pilot.
 
According to the Australasian College of Pharmacy (ACP), the course has been designed to ‘expand your knowledge to support pharmacists’ expansion in scope of practice’ and will help pharmacy assistants understand its purpose, benefits, and their role.
 
But its launch comes amid rising concern over the controversial pilot, which enables pharmacists to administer a wide range of vaccines and prescribe medicines for common health conditions throughout Queensland.
 
Pharmacy assistants can now enrol in the three-hour, $99 course online, which, once completed, will allow them to list key services, identify patient eligibility, understand patient confidentiality and consent, and outline the fee structure.
 
RACGP President Dr Nicole Higgins is concerned the course alludes to a lack of capacity within the pharmacy workforce.
 
‘Does this mean that my medical reception team, which has undergone similar training about confidentiality, privacy, triage, billing, and compliance, can support a patient with a UTI?,’ she told newsGP.
 
‘They’re now having to get pharmacy assistants to help roll out the pilot, and it demonstrates that pharmacy does not have the capacity to be managing medical problems in retail pharmacy.
 
‘We would be better off supporting existing infrastructure, such as paying practices and practice nurses to be able to support patients.’
 
The pilot was designed to give patients greater access to healthcare, especially for those living in rural and regional Queensland.
 
Participating pharmacists must also complete additional training to manage the pilot’s criteria, which include autonomous prescribing for several conditions.
 
But it has long drawn the ire of GPs, who say ‘patients deserve to be diagnosed and treated by medically trained doctors‘.
 
The ACP has now urged assistants employed at pharmacies enrolled in the pilot program to undertake the training, stating they will ‘learn how to support their pharmacist, gather valuable data, and play a key role in determining the pilot’s success’.
 
Dr Higgins said moving forward, it will be crucial to ‘find the right balance’ between care and access.
 
‘I’m still waiting for the robust evaluation that demonstrates the benefits to the patients and to the health budget,’ she said.
 
‘Recruiting pharmacy assistants which don’t require any formal qualifications to undertake a three-hour course to be the frontline of the trial is inappropriate.
 
‘We can’t trade off quality and safety for access and convenience.’
 
The organisation’s CEO Melanie Hunt said it recognises the need to upskill pharmacy assistants to ensure the pilot’s success.
 
‘For Queensland community pharmacists to be able to provide expanded healthcare services to their patients, pharmacy assistants need to be able to do more to support their pharmacist colleagues,’ she said.
 
‘As such, the college is the only Australian pharmacy education provider offering this niche training course for Queensland pharmacy assistants.’
 
As part of its 2024–25 pre-Budget submission, the RACGP is calling for greater support for practices to grow their teams and employ other health professionals, including funds dedicated to the employment of a general practice-based pharmacist.
 
Log in below to join the conversation.



North Queensland pharmacy pilot NQPHN pharmacy prescribing scope of practice


newsGP weekly poll Which RACGP request would you most like the Government to fund in the upcoming Federal Budget?
 
15%
 
0%
 
85%
 
0%
 
0%
Related



newsGP weekly poll Which RACGP request would you most like the Government to fund in the upcoming Federal Budget?

Advertising

Advertising


Login to comment

Dr Arshad Hussain Merchant   16/03/2024 7:29:26 AM

I’m not convinced with the college stand what they are arguing about…
Instead college should produce a price for service taking in account inflation and CPI index eg item 23 service $102/- and stop asking for higher rebates and bulk billing and practice incentives.. pharmacy has been incentivised for doing 2 month prescription plus they are allowed to charge full fee on scripts as they are loosing business.. i loose business too when I am not going to see this person for a year now but there is no incentive for me
General Practice is a business and so far college has disappointed me coming up with a strategic business strategy.. let them tax us as and let it be pass to the consumer..
RACGP need to stop looking for charity and change their approach to business model


Dr Brendan Sean Chaston   23/03/2024 9:35:26 AM

The changes are coming thick and fast now. The horse has bolted. I’d suggest the RACGPs pre budget submission for support to employ other non gp health professionals will occur in support of entrenching non medical degree health professionals as primary care providers. A Trogan horse if you like. The experience in the uk is that new gp Fellowes can’t get work as the consult rooms are full allied health professionals. ‘Careful what you wish for’ or ‘if you can’t beat them join them’. Take you pick.