Advertising


News

GPs forced to turn away Veteran Card holders due to low rebates: RACGP


Chelsea Heaney


25/04/2024 6:00:00 AM

Access to the Coordinated Veterans’ Care program is also reportedly being limited due to eligibility restrictions, complex bureaucratic processes, and a lack of clinician awareness.

ADF uniform.
Despite the access challenges, more than 35,000 GPs provided over 1.4 million services to 145,178 Veteran Card holders in 2022–23.

GPs are becoming increasingly unable to accept Veteran Cards due to insufficient rebates that are failing to keep up with the cost of patient care, according to a new RACGP submission.
 
While the college is ‘very supportive’ of the Coordinated Veterans’ Care (CVC) program, it stated that ‘refusal of Veteran Cards will continue’ if indexation of the Department of Veteran Affairs (DVA) fee schedule is not increased.
 
Under the program, GPs can receive a fee that is 115% of the normal MBS item rebate for the equivalent service. In return for the higher rates, they are unable to charge DVA clients a gap fee.
 
But with practices increasingly relying on mixed billing to stay afloat due to poor indexation, the college says even the higher fees associated with the program are not enough to make up the shortfall.
 
The submission also addressed a lack of education and awareness among GPs regarding the program, as well as the complex bureaucratic processes that lead some eligible veterans to give up on accessing the service.
 
RACGP Vice President Associate Professor Michael Clements, a Townsville-based GP and veteran of the Royal Australian Airforce, said a lot of GPs are not familiar with all of the various DVA programs, funding models and codes as they may only manage a small number of veterans.
 
‘If they are not dealing with veterans regularly then they may not be up to date,’ he told newsGP.
 
‘I do think there is a need for practices to learn and understand how to look after our veterans.’
 
Meanwhile, RACGP President Dr Nicole Higgins said simple changes to the CVC would improve access to care for more veterans.
 
‘It’s crucial that returning veterans get the care and support they need throughout their lives, and general practice is at the heart of coordinated care, and any support work,’ she said.
 
‘The indexation of the DVA schedule is too low and doesn’t come close to the cost of providing care, which means some practices are unable to accept Veteran Cards. This needs to be addressed urgently to improve access to care.
 
‘We’re also recommending DVA introduce a GP awareness campaign to promote the program … [and] improve access to care for patients who need it.’
 
In response to questions regarding greater indexation of rebates, a DVA spokesperson said GPs can already claim a supplementary Veteran Access Payment for services delivered to DVA clients, which received a $33.3 million boost over four years in last year’s Federal Budget.
 
‘From 1 November 2023, the total payment for a GP consultation of up to 20 minutes [Level B] plus the … VAP increased from $55.45 to $71.90 in metropolitan areas and from $62.85 to $94.30 in the most remote areas of Australia,’ they told newsGP.
 
‘In addition to this investment, the 2023–24 Budget also made changes to indexation arrangements to better align with wages and prices movements.
 
‘On 1 July 2023, DVA fees for medical practitioners were indexed by 3.6%, with another one-off fee indexation of 0.5% on 1 November 2023.’
 
The spokesperson also said the DVA is working to simplify its processes to make it easier for veterans to access support.
 
‘This includes the current process to harmonise and simplify the legislative framework, moving from three Acts to one ongoing Act,’ they said.
 
‘We are currently consulting with the veteran community about this draft legislation and we encourage all veterans, and interested stakeholders, to have their say. Consultation is open until 28 April.’
 
Despite the access challenges, more than 35,000 GPs provided over 1.4 million services to 145,178 Veteran Card holders in 2022–23, and Associate Professor Clements said parts of the veterans’ care program ‘really do go above and beyond what there is in standard Medicare’.
 
‘We absolutely use the CVC as a routine part of our care model for our patients,’ he said.
 
However, the program does not include White Card holders and veterans aged over 50 with a chronic health condition that is not a mental health condition – a restriction Associate Professor Clements believes should be reconsidered.
 
‘Many [veterans] may have chronic conditions that may or may not be service-related as they age,’ he said.
 
‘At the moment aged care residents who are veterans are excluded from CVC and we do know that many of our veterans are finding it hard to find a GP to take them on in an aged care facility.
 
‘So expanding the CVC program to include residents of aged care would likely see an immediate boost in the number of these veterans finding a GP that is going to look after them.’
 
The DVA spokesperson said the ongoing evaluation will assess the benefits, including clinical outcomes and wellbeing impacts, of the CVC Program for Gold Card holders with a chronic condition and White Card holders with an accepted mental health condition.
 
‘Evaluation will also explore options to redesign the CVC Program to better meet the chronic disease management and mental health needs of current and future DVA clients,’ they said.
 
‘Consultation … has already occurred with a wide range of stakeholders.
 
‘Findings from this evaluation will inform future program improvements.’
 
Log in below to join the conversation.



ANZAC bulk billing CVC program Department of Veterans’ Affairs DVA Gold Card veterans White Card


newsGP weekly poll Which RACGP request would you most like the Government to fund in the upcoming Federal Budget?
 
25%
 
7%
 
57%
 
4%
 
5%
Related



newsGP weekly poll Which RACGP request would you most like the Government to fund in the upcoming Federal Budget?

Advertising

Advertising


Login to comment

Dr Dylan C   25/04/2024 7:10:03 AM

Having a look at item number 306 (psychiatry 45-75 mins), medicare rebate: $205.20 Benefit: 75% = $153.90 85% = $174.45. Whereas the RMFS rebate for item number 306 is $297.55 per https://www.dva.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-03/20240301-dva-medical-services-schedules_0.pdf.

Compare that to a GP's item number 23, medicare rebate of $41.40, RFMS rebate of $47.65.

How is this fair? The CVC program should respect & value GPs' work, by meeting the AMA rates, at the very least.


Dr John Brett Deery   25/04/2024 10:52:30 AM

In our group, we started privately charging all white card holders 18 months ago. One GP got sick of it, and it rapidly snowballed to all of them.
We still accept DVA rates for our gold card holders with CVCP.


Dr Peter James Strickland   25/04/2024 11:00:05 AM

As an Army RAAMC officer veteran the problem lies directly with DVA to correct any problems of treatment and fees paid to GPs. DVA is a minefield of bureaucratic nonsense and hold-ups by those that work there, and the reason for many veteran suicides. I personally spent months trying to get left knee surgery for an obvious Army service injury, and in the end had to use my private Defence Health cover, and a month AFTER my surgery I got DVA approval to have it done!! The Minister for DVA and his government cohorts need to get decent responsible staff, and change DVA approvals and the eligibility criteria and legislation for veterans to pragmatic levels. All ex-service personnel of 5 yrs plus should be covered for all their pragmatic medical needs for life (GOLD card), as war and peace-time service can carry the same traumatic life -threatening experiences often to many of those veterans --like me.


Dr Jean Margaret Sparling   25/04/2024 3:21:17 PM

Lest we forget. Veterans and GPs are becoming an endangered species - until suddenly needed. By then may well be too late.


Dr Nikolai Alexandrov Manassiev   25/04/2024 8:27:22 PM

The article does not make it clear why retired army people should be treated any different from any other patients in the first place. People choose to take up a job with army presumably because they like it as a vocation and as a career. My patients will interested to know why ex-army people should pay less to see their GP then them, simply on the basis that army employees enlisted for a job which they liked, got paid for it while they were employed, and then retired. How is that different from any other occupation, say for example nursing? Getting a nursing degree, starting working, getting paid, then retiring. So to go to back to the crux of the matter which is: Why do we need to spend time discussing the DVA rebate and complaining about it, rather than spend time discussing the fundamental question why ex-army people should be treated different from anyone else?


Dr Ian Francis Gordon   26/04/2024 11:55:56 AM

I am intrigued by the comment of Dr Nikolai Alexandrov Manassiev, particularly as it was made on ANZAC day, a day where the ultimate sacrifice of many, not all of whom asked to serve, should be acknowledged. I would suggest that the tone of Dr Nikolai Alexandrov Manassiev's contribution would imply that he is one who enjoys the freedom we in Australia enjoy without actually contributing, or having contributed to that freedom - a net user of our society. If you have never borne arms the difference between a serving member and civilian is something you will never understand ... evidenced also by your use of uncapitalised Army implying service in all three arms of the ADF.