Advertising


News

Health Minister ‘very worried’ about payroll tax impacts


Michelle Wisbey


22/04/2024 3:52:40 PM

Mark Butler has urged state governments to ‘listen closely’ to GPs and their concerns, or risk undoing bulk-billing and Medicare reforms.

Health Minister Mark Butler.
Federal Health and Aged Care Minister Mark Butler is worried that payroll tax changes will cancel out the Government’s recent Medicare investments. (Image: AAP)

Federal Health and Aged Care Minister Mark Butler has added his voice to growing calls for state governments to reverse their payroll tax grabs, warning its implementation is at odds with recent health investments.
 
The Minister’s pleas come after the RACGP and doctors across the country have warned widespread practice closures could be on the way if states do not rule out the potentially crippling tax.
 
Already, practice owners have reported receiving bills of more than five million dollars as state governments continue their crackdown on the new tax.
 
In a new show of unity with GPs, Minister Butler said state and territory governments need to listen to doctors, the college, and the widespread calls for change.
 
‘Payroll tax is a matter for the states, but I am very worried that our historic investments we’ve put into Medicare, in response to calls from state governments, will be lost to increased payroll tax obligations by general practices,’ he told the ABC.
 
‘I’ve strongly urged state treasurers, premiers, and health ministers to listen closely to general practice organisations like the [RACGP] in their states about ways in which they can work through this.’
 
RACGP President Dr Nicole Higgins welcomed this sign of support from Australia’s top health decisionmaker.
 
‘It is time that the Health Minister started reigning in the state premiers who are undermining his efforts to support general practice,’ she told newsGP.
 
‘Minister Butler is now coming out strongly in support of GPs, the payroll tax issue, and the impact that this is having on our patients.
 
‘We can’t have a Federal Government supporting general practice and patients at the same time as we have our state treasurer’s and health ministers use Medicare money to prop up their own coffers.’
 
It comes after the tripling of the bulk billing incentive was rolled out last year, in addition to further investments into Medicare and general practice, in a bid to make a trip to the doctor more affordable, particularly for vulnerable Australians.
 
One month after the incentive went live in November, a 2.1% increase in bulk billing rates was recorded nationally.
 
But according to the latest data, just 83% of provider fees were paid by Medicare in February, compared to 85% when the incentive was introduced.
 
Recent HotDoc data also revealed 95% of responding Victorian clinics plan to increase patient fees by an average of $12 per appointment in response to any tax changes.
 
Several states have introduced payroll tax amnesties for practices to help prepare for the change, but GPs say a lack of long-term certainty remains.
 
The most pressing need for change comes in South Australia where its amnesty ends on 30 June this year, while in Victoria, GPs can only request ex gratia relief with no amnesty period on offer.
 
But Dr Higgins said the debate over payroll tax reform has been going for too long, and now is the time for state political leaders to act.
 
‘The healthcare system is being undermined by state greed when they need to be looking at the big picture, because having the added payroll tax on Medicare will lead to increased ramping and overflowing emergency departments, which will impact their own hospitals – it’s an own goal,’ she said.
 
‘GPs are starting to have conversations with patients around what payroll tax will mean and the impact that will have on increasing the gap and reducing bulk billing.
 
‘At a time when we’re starting to see green shoots in general practice, payroll tax will just cause them to wither and die.’
 
Last year, the RACGP launched a petition calling for the tax to be scrapped, which has so far gained more than 11,500 signatures from doctors and patients alike.
 
Additionally, conversations are continuing with the Victorian Government to sure up support for the state’s medical centres.
 
Log in below to join the conversation.



bulk billing Mark Butler payroll tax


newsGP weekly poll Which RACGP request would you most like the Government to fund in the upcoming Federal Budget?
 
25%
 
7%
 
57%
 
4%
 
5%
Related





newsGP weekly poll Which RACGP request would you most like the Government to fund in the upcoming Federal Budget?

Advertising

Advertising


Login to comment

Dr Shanthini Seelan   23/04/2024 9:08:24 AM

Finally solidarity ! Thankyou Minister for listening to the very people at coalface We run a bulkbilling practice in the very heart of Western Sydney and serve a huge vulnerable population - we are responsible for their complex convoluted health needs and just want to continue providing decent top quality health services The new incentives are a godsend but the threat of the over hanging payroll tax is always in the background diminishing our hopes of continued bulkbilling services . It is futile trying to contact our state government - previous attempts have fallen through spectacularly.
So here’s hoping


Dr Motiur Rahman   23/04/2024 1:16:24 PM

I run my Bulk billing practice at Werrington County for the last 15 years . This demography unable to afford mix billing. Older generation here suffers from complex medical problems & will suffer more .


Prof Max Kamien, AM. CitWA   23/04/2024 4:23:09 PM

In the late 1970s I set up a teaching practice in a Housing Commission suburb of 7000 people that had, for 7 years, been unable to attract a GP. The practice flourished. The AMA advised doctors of the tax and superannuation benefits of incorporation. So, we incorporated with my university and paid PT at 3.5%. Several years later our accountant introduced us to the term ’Grouping Provisions’. We sought a ruling from the Payroll Tax commissioner. He deemed we were grouped with my university. We were fined $6000 for taking 3 days to report and $139,000 for back taxes (6% not 3.5%). We appealed to no avail. The Premier of the time promised to help. I am still waiting.