Advertising


News

Historic $8.5b Medicare investment explained


Jolyon Attwooll


24/02/2025 4:37:42 PM

Exactly what do the major parties’ commitments include and how will a promise to make ‘nine out of 10 visits to the GP free’ impact practices?

Anthony Albanese.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese unveiling the Labor Party’s Medicare investment. (Image: AAP/Rob Burnett)

An ‘amazing’ investment for GP training, but a ‘mixed bag’ for general practices financially: that’s how RACGP President Dr Michael Wright views an election funding promise described as the ‘single largest investment’ in Medicare history.
 
In Launceston on Sunday, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese unveiled a long-anticipated, central plank of the Australian Labor Party re-election campaign, promising a $8.5 billion boost to Medicare funding.
 
The Prime Minister said investment in a new Bulk Billing Practice Incentive Program, to begin from November this year, will support thousands more general practices to bulk bill every patient, and ensure ‘no one is held back, and no one is left behind’.
 
If re-elected, the party’s plan will widen the tripled bulk-billing incentive introduced for concession cardholders in November 2023 to the whole population, as well as introducing a 12.5% loading payment on Medicare rebates for clinics that fully bulk bill.
 
‘Our plan will mean more bulk billing, in every part of our country because our Government wants nine out of 10 visits to the GP to be free,’ the Prime Minister said.
 
The investment will allow an additional 18 million bulk-billed visits to the GP each year, as well as support the training of 2000 more GPs each year by 2028.
 
Federal Health and Aged Care Minister Mark Butler says the policy could boost the bulk-billing rate to 90%.
 
The Government’s newly announced election promise was shortly followed by a pledge by the Coalition to match the commitment ‘dollar for dollar’.
 
Opposition leader Peter Dutton said he was pleased to announce the Coalition would commit $9 billion extra funding to Medicare including a previous $500 million pledge for more mental health support.
 
‘It will provide support to training, it will provide support to mental health services, and it will provide support to making sure that practices are viable and can provide a mix of services to patients,’ Mr Dutton said.
 
Dr Wright welcomed the bipartisan commitment to invest in Medicare.
 
However, he warned a focus on bulk-billing rates will not suit all general practice business models.
 
‘The additional investment into general practice is a positive thing but we’ve got to make sure that it’s targeted to the people who need it and the GPs who need that funding as well,’ he told newsGP.
 
According to the Labor Party, its investment means around 4800 practices will be in a better financial position if they adopt full bulk billing.
 
Details of the exact difference the Medicare pledge could make to rebates were included in the official announcement (see extract below).

Medicare-announcement-article.jpg
They show a 62% increase for a standard Level B consult in metro areas at a fully bulk-billed general practice, with rebates for non-concession card holding adults rising from $42.85 to $69.56. The rebate for bulk-billed Level B consultations in remote areas will more than double to $86.91.
 
Meanwhile Level C consultations will increase by 30% in city areas and 59% in the most remote districts, with the lower rise a cause of concern to Dr Wright.
 
‘We have been asking for increased Medicare rebates, particularly targeting long consultations and mental health consultations, because we know that’s where the chronic disease and the complex care happen,’ he said.
 
‘We will definitely be highlighting some of the unintended impacts of this because it does increase the remuneration for shorter consultations much higher than it does for long consultations and chronic disease management.
 
‘Do we have enough GPs to meet the extra demand and what’s going to be the impact on health outcomes if it’s harder for people to get a longer appointment because the incentives are so strong for shorter ones?’
 
The RACGP President also said GPs may face more pressure to bulk bill and emphasised that an expansion of bulk-billing incentives does not oblige general practices to adopt them.
 
‘Just because these bulk-billing incentives are available to everyone doesn’t mean everyone’s going to have access to bulk billing, because GPs are still able to set their fees and the college will completely support that going forward,’ he said.
 
‘The Medicare rebate still may not cover the cost of care and that’s really important for government to make clear and for patients to know.’
 
However, the RACGP President gave an unequivocal welcome to the commitments to boost support for training GPs, which is one of the college’s key election requests.
 
The workforce and training funding pledges outlined by the Albanese Government include:

  • $265.2 million to expand GP training with 200 additional training places per year from 2026, growing to 400 by 2028
  • $204.8 million to fund salary incentives for junior doctors to specialise in general practice
  • $43.9 million to provide paid parental leave and study leave for GP trainees
  • $44 million for an additional 200 junior doctor rotations in primary health care each year from 2026, increasing to 400 annually by 2028
  • $48.4 million for 100 additional Commonwealth Supported Places for medical students annually from 2026, rising to 150 by 2028, with demand-driven places for First Nations students
The announcement confirms Medicare as a key battleground for the forthcoming Federal Election, for which a date is still yet to be confirmed.
 
In a series of interviews on Monday, Minister Butler set out his belief that the Medicare investment will mean most clinics are better off if they fully bulk bill.
 
We know almost 5000 practices, which is the very clear majority of general practices in the country, would be better off if they bulk billed all of their patients under the funding that we announced yesterday,’ Minister Butler told the ABC.   
 
‘We’re pretty confident this means that we can get to 90% [bulk-billing rate] across the population, not just for pensioners, and we’ll triple the number of practices that become bulk-billing practices, that means they bulk bill everyone who comes through their door.’
 
However, for Dr Wright the true picture of the investment’s impact is not yet clear.
 
‘We’ve got over 7000 practices, and we can’t afford to lose any of them due to worsening viability,’ he said.
 
Log in below to join the conversation.



bulk billing Federal Election Medicare


newsGP weekly poll Do you think changes are needed to make the PBS authority approval process more streamlined for GPs?
 
94%
 
3%
 
1%
Related





newsGP weekly poll Do you think changes are needed to make the PBS authority approval process more streamlined for GPs?

Advertising

Advertising


Login to comment

Dr RM   25/02/2025 7:35:24 AM

Was racgp consulted in this?
Most clinics don’t BB Concession card holders even with the the existing BB incentives as it still doesn’t cover costs. There needs to be more push back on this as I fear patients are going to start demanding BB or less gap even though it’s tied to the BB incentives
This PR exercise by the government is going to hurt general practice


Dr Nirupam Gupta   25/02/2025 7:41:28 AM

Unless the profession understands that it’s an incentive (which can be taken away any time or scaled back) and the only real solution is increased patient rebate, there will be no long term solution but just a carrot and stick game with the pollies


Dr Rimas Vincent Liubinas   25/02/2025 7:52:30 AM

This continual focus on bulk billing is tiring . What about quality care and supporting monetarily longer consultations to quell the 6 minute churn that this system encourages. It is like the government want to employ gp’s without paying super , holiday pay , sick leave and maternity leave.


Dr Ian Rivlin   25/02/2025 8:16:18 AM

I've had nearly 40 years of BS from the government, l have learnt not to believe either side. Especially, I have learnt not to believe Labor who seem to have turned lying into a fine art.
Where is this $8.5 billion going to come from? Does nobody understand that, Come November, they'll just say "sorry, we don't have the money..."
Why didn't Albinese increase the rebate 3 years ago? How come this massive spending spree has just been released a few weeks before the election?
My advice to the general public and all those gullible doctors out there:- "Put not your trust in princes." (Psalm 146:3)
Albinese has done more harm to Australians in 3 years than the previous five administrations combined. He's without competence or honour.


Mr Greg Davis   25/02/2025 11:26:49 AM

Unfortunately, I have not seen any moves to increase the motivation for existing GPs to be involved with the supervision of GPs' training pathways. As such, the next generation of GP Specialists is under threat as there are not enough supervisors to ensure the throughput required. The mechanisms to encourage, promote and support the creation of additional supervisors and retain the existing ones do not exist. This is sure to mean that we will still be short of GPs in the distant future.


Dr David Lap Yan Lee   25/02/2025 12:41:20 PM

Complete waste of money for vote buying. 1st world problem. 77% bulkbill rate is fantastic. Tell the lazy voter to walk or take the train to the poor suburb and the country voter to move to the city if they want fully bulkbill. Australia is so behind on new technology (ai/robot/self driving and science) 8 billions should spend on progressing the country. Keep digging the dirt and sell to China then.


Dr Paul Francis Innis   25/02/2025 1:28:51 PM

Bulk billing incentives needs to be avaialble to the working poor not just health care holders. Many families under mortgage or rent stress delay or go without healthcare because they can't afford gaps.


Dr Siva Kumar Raju Muppala   25/02/2025 3:08:03 PM

Please support increase in rebate. Encouraging bulk bill incentives means indirectly discouraging quality care and long consultations. How do we justify same incentive to 6 minute consult and to 60 minute consultation ?


Anonymous   25/02/2025 6:23:43 PM

Only the racgp would spruik a pay cut for its members as a win. Other industries go on strike when they get offered a terrible pay increase, ours lauds a cut. Also, did anyone else notice how they changed their tune once most gps said how bad a deal this is?


Dr Finch   25/02/2025 7:49:17 PM

How does this help anyone practising "good medicine"? The greatest % income increase per minute is for the BB churn through clinics that are the least likely to actually change the individual's or our population's health statistics. It does nothing for affordability to see a non-bulk billing GP, who are usually the GPs who have decided to book 2-3/ hour instead of 6-10/ hour. I recently worked with a GP whose booking sheet was 10-minute bookings & had "the capacity" to squeeze in more. Their Armani suits became the symbol of my lost income while cleaning up their messes. This doesn't lead to behaviour/lifestyle change & it rarely leads to compliance with investigations & medications. These aren't typically consults that reduce the "big" population maimers & killers (morbidity & mortality). I've today told my PracM that I aim to significantly reduce my GP hours to eventually nil & likely to ONLY work in GP subspecialty clinics until retirement. It's just too sad & ignorant.


Dr Joseph Dinesh Rodriguge Fernando   25/02/2025 9:09:45 PM

1. Mixed billing GPs are already absorbing losses from bulk-billing health care cardholders, pensioners, and children.
2. We cannot bulk-bill the rest of the patient cohort and incur an additional loss of $10 per patient. This is not viable.
3. We see this as using GPs as political scapegoats, as politicians want to look good by claiming that we bulk-bill all patients.
4. They do not care about our viability; if they did, why did it take five years for Albo to wake up from his slumber?
5. The government cannot dictate our fees; we set our own fees.
6. We are already losing patients through urgent care and telephone script lines.
7. If we started to bulk-bill everyone for $69.50, we would have to practice "sausage factory" medicine, seeing six patients per hour. This would result in very low quality of care.

The system that politicians are suggesting—to bulk-bill every patient for $69.50—will ruin the quality of general practice.


Dr Bilal Ali Khan   25/02/2025 10:37:21 PM

Why do they not increase the actual rebates rather than just increasing BB incentives for everyone? These announcements from either side suggest they think we as GPs and public at large are stupid. Make Level B 70$ flat , level C 115$ flat . We'll choose who we BB and who we charge. It is private practice and open market. I don't think increasing incentives will change how I currently bill .


Dr Peter James Strickland   25/02/2025 11:53:13 PM

Beware here of following the dollars, and not seeing that freedom of practice costs being compromised by accepting this offer. Look at the "new" so-called BB rates and charge the difference by looking at the present standard rate (eg $42.85), add the extra fee that is needed to be viable, and get the patients and tell them that is the government that is not giving them the full rebate. In other words, DO NOT ACCEPT being tied into a socialist system of being controlled, or you will eventually regret it, as it will NOT cover your practice costs in the long-term on dressings, injections, staff, leases, insurances, technology etc etc, and leave you with worries, poorer income in the long-term, and dissatisfied being under bureaucratic control!


Dr Deborah Ann Lizbeth McAlister   27/02/2025 11:55:04 PM

The government should increase Medicare rebates. As a practice we will not change our private billing. The rates proposed will not be a viable option.


Dr Mahavir Prasad Gupta   1/03/2025 1:10:12 PM

It appears to be purely a political spin. I am sure political people in power are very well aware that GPs will not accept a pay cut but projecting 90% of population will be bulk billed is likely to create the situation where GPs would be blamed by ordinary people (in spite of Government giving incentive to the GPs!).
Last time the same political party projected that average GP earns 350000 per year. Although the then health minister said, the average GP "Bills" 350000 per year but majority of public just looked at the number without understanding that "Billing is not income".
Yes, the political parties are not telling lies but trying to befool ordinary people.