Advertising


News

‘It devalues us’: Physician assistant roles raising concerns


Chelsea Heaney


18/07/2024 3:40:03 PM

A new push to expand the use of PAs has triggered fears the role will expand in Australia, which the RACGP says is to the detriment of GPs.

A doctor with two assistants in a hospital.
GPs are concerned workforce shortages will be filled with less qualified physician assistants.

The RACGP is ‘deeply concerned’ by a new ‘Business Case for Change’ proposing the further rollout of physician assistants (PAs) in Australian healthcare.
 
It comes after a Queensland hospital service published the proposal for the change, a plan RACGP President Nicole Higgins said echoes the controversial use of PAs in the NHS and spells trouble for general practice.
 
‘This raises red flags at a time when our system is undergoing reform, ,’ she told newsGP.
 
‘In the NHS physician assistants are used as a less qualified, cheaper workforce solution that have been used as substitutes for doctors.
 
‘That has created huge problems and undermined the NHS health system, and resulted in many NHS GP refugees fleeing to Australia and other countries to practice.’
 
In the Business Case, the Sunshine Coast Hospital and Health Service (SCHHS) asked for funding for a PA role in emergency departments.
 
SCHHS runs five hospitals in Southeast Queensland and six health centres.
 
The RACGP says  greater adoption of the physician assistant role in Australia, and a potential move to replace doctors with physician assistants, will confuse patients and worsen health outcomes.
 
The college has already raised concerns about role substitution and highly trained doctors being replaced as part of the Federal Government’s Scope of Practice Review.

Dr Higgins said she does not believe PAs are the right fit to address the country’s current workforce shortages.
 
‘This is not acceptable in Australia,’ she said.
 
‘They UK have traded off quality and safety PAs who are cheaper and quicker to train. We should not do the same in Australia.
 
‘It devalues us as GPs.’
 
The college has had long-held concerns about GPs’ scope of practice in Australia and the direction of a new review investigating the matter.
 
Earlier this year, the BMJ published an opinion piece warning that the NHS is ‘facing a crisis’ and ‘at issue is the creation of new groups of health workers called physician associates’.
 
‘Originally PAs were envisaged as assistants to doctors to increase their productivity by relieving them of some routine tasks,’ it reads.
 
‘However, in many hospitals and general practices they are being deployed to replace doctors, taking on increasingly complex roles, including the assessment and management of patients with undiagnosed problems.
 
The RACGP has issued a position statement on the role of PAs, concluding that ‘it is not appropriate to broaden the introduction of the physician assistant role in Australia’.
 
‘Increasing physician assistants may reduce numbers of GPs and resourcing for the current health workforce roles in rural health,’ it states.
 
The Queensland Department of Health has been contacted for comment.
 
Log in below to join the conversation.



funding general practice NHS physicians assistant


newsGP weekly poll Do you use the GP Psychiatry Support Line?
 
16%
 
83%
 
0%
Related




newsGP weekly poll Do you use the GP Psychiatry Support Line?

Advertising

Advertising


Login to comment

Dr Corne Johan Kriek   19/07/2024 6:38:17 AM

We already have fantastic physicians assistants. Practice nurses are fully qualified to fulfil that role. From what I understand, the UK version of "PAs" work under very specific and limited scopes of practice. If AHPRA recognises well trained professionals to sit and do BPs, BMIs, waist measurements, do rhythm strips, complete Centrelink forms, medical certificates, confirm that KPIs are met... day in and day out, leaving me to do hands on medicine and double my patient-throughput, why not?


Dr Ilhaam Abdul Hameed   19/07/2024 7:37:20 AM

I thought PA position assistant roles are not new to our health system. I worked with PAs in a nsw district hospital. My understanding was they are final year students work under supervision and they will come and discuss each and every case with the senior and they will not take any decisions. In that department it worked ok as it reduces some work load. I thought it is good for those final year medical students as they are going to be interns next year and a good introduction for them.

They were working almost like nurse practitioners but they had more clinical knowledge than the nurse practitioners that means they were able to see the patients with some clinical complexities rather than fast tract patients.

This mentality of finding cheap clinical labour will only be resolved when we elect and choose sensible policy makers who understand the value of primary care and willing to increase the Medicare rebate, until then we will be having these type of mind bubbles along the way


Dr Paul Vernon Jenkinson   19/07/2024 9:08:50 PM

The purpose of this proposal is to replace general practitioner roles.
GPs need to let that soak in.
Your job/career is at risk or at least ,you are going to become a lot poorer.
The GP profession let this slow erosion of GP start when nurse practitioners were warmly welcomed. Then it was pharmacists with vaccinations and some minor clinical roles. Now the debate with regard to PAs is from a much less powerful negotiating position.
We couldn't listen to those disillusioned GPs from the NHS!?


Dr Sandra Hirowatari   20/07/2024 4:44:19 AM

PA's do have a role that is SIDE by SIDE with physicians (North American definition of "doctor"). They called them Physician arm extenders in the military and were used very effectively as such. As Drs Kriek and Hameed point out there are very many advantages to a PA. I find that they are in many ways (appropriately) less autonomous than an NP, and are more consultative. Very much a team member.

If RACGP can change their focus and lead this political move by directing how to interface with these very useful colleagues, we'd all by happier with PAs at our sides. RACGP's focus should be to not let the PAs leave THEIR comfort zone. They are truly trained as "assistants" not independent practitioners.

Please RACGP, look at this again at a deeper level.


Dr Eva Ditmar-Jansse   20/07/2024 4:27:01 PM

Highly skilled ED nurses, clinic nurses, interns etc all do an amazing job. If people are to be introduced as physicial assistants, and they are to do clinical decision making, then they too should have medical indemnity insurance and be responsible for their decisions.... to what extent will doctors in the same location be burdened with vicarious liability? What do the indemnity insurance companies have to say on the matter?


Dr Richard Sturrock   21/07/2024 11:42:40 PM

(1/2) I am British, but hold FRACGP. The reason why PAs must not be introduced at all costs, is because, whilst they were originally billed as admin assistants for doctors, they are most definitely not. My colleagues who work as GPs in the UK tell me that these PAs are making decisions on undifferentiated patients, ordering investigations, and giving (dangerous) advice despite only completing 2 years of study. Many of them have failed to get onto medical degrees, and have an over inflated sense of capability. Patients are often under the impression they are seeing a doctor, when in fact they are seeing a PA. The GP is also ultimately held accountable for decisions and prescriptions made in their absence. For example, a patient was prescribed oestrogen only HRT, and there’s this https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/british-medical-association-jasmine-nhs-government-crouch-end-b2508770.html.


Dr Richard Sturrock   21/07/2024 11:50:58 PM

(2/2)PAs are treated preferentially/given first dibs with regards to procedures and assisting in theatres, as they’re not rotating to different teams, and they’re not independent enough to be able to complete ward rounds, complete documentation or refer. This de-skills doctors, and leaves them to do all the admin, i.e. the exact opposite of the intended purpose of PAs.

Finally, GP practices are financially incentivised to employ PAs (salary does not come out of the practice budget), such that there is now a shortage of GP positions and I have GP friends who are unable to full find full time work.

PAs also have a higher base salary than the interns and HMOs.

Why should I, with 15yrs of experience, tolerate this? Why should we devalue GPs, and expect them to supervise and be accountable for PAs.

It’s truly astonishing.


Mrs Gulalai Hashemi   24/07/2024 4:56:07 PM

I heard in the news that the UK introduced PA roles during the COVID crisis.

They hired citize (IMGs) international medical graduates who were working towards their registration.
If Australia is going to hire citizen IMGs too, it would be a really great initiative for us.

Like me, thousands of citizens IMGs who are eligible for limited registration with AHPRA are unemployed and searching for jmo jobs desperately without any success.

I passed many challenges through my AMC journey until I passed the exams and am eligible for registration , I deserve to be in the system.