Advertising


News

‘Join this century’: Call for change amid growing GP red tape


Chelsea Heaney


29/08/2024 3:21:58 PM

The RACGP is demanding a solution from the Commonwealth after presenting it with a long list of cumbersome ways its services are burdening time-poor GPs.

A woman frustrated at a pile of paperwork.
The Health of the Nation report showed 60% of GPs are dissatisfied with the amount of administration in their work.

The RACGP is urging for a Federal Government rethink to address the impacts of regulation and admin burden on GPs in a new submission.
 
The calls for change come as part of the Long-term Insights Briefing project, which was designed to explore ‘the future of government service delivery beyond the current cycles of reform’.
 
Deputy Chair of RACGP Expert Committee – Funding and Health System Reform, Dr Emil Djakic, says this rise in administrative burden is one of the biggest issues for general practice.
 
‘Imagine the amount of time we collectively waste because of inefficient federal digital services and imagine how many full-time equivalent GPs that’s costing per year because of poor design,’ he told newsGP.
 
‘We’re really keen for our federal side of things to do some catch up and join this century.’
 
In its submission to the project, the RACGP’s list of current red tape examples included:

  • frequent changes to the MBS
  • use of vague and ambiguous language in MBS explanatory materials
  • requiring GPs to wait on the phone for a PBS authority script
  • the need for a patient to assign their benefit to the GP each time they are bulk billed
  • use of forms that do not integrate with general practice clinical software
  • issues when registering a practice and patients for MyMedicare
  • the 90-day pay doctor cheque scheme
  • payroll tax rules in various jurisdictions
  • Medicare compliance letters asking providers to review a schedule of claims made in the past.
To try and remedy the situation, the RACGP has called for digital systems used by Government to be fit-for-purpose and easy to use, as well as simplifying the MBS where possible, such as through the removal of disease-specific item numbers.
 
It also recommended the need to inform GPs in a timely manner of major policy changes, adapting Government forms to better integrate with clinical and practice software, and supporting research into innovative technologies to automate administrative processes.
 
RACGP President Dr Nicole Higgins says GPs are being increasingly burdened with administrative tasks that detract from their core role of providing medical care to their patients.
 
‘In recent years, particularly during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, GPs have been required to keep up to date regarding streams of major policy changes,’ she said.
 
‘These issues are compounded by a lack of remuneration for tasks completed in the patient’s absence, with MBS rebates not available for paperwork completed when the patient is not present.
 
‘Digital systems used by Government need to be fit-for-purpose and easy to use.’
 
In the latest Health of the Nation report, 65% of GPs reported that regulatory and compliance burden has made them consider stopping practise, with 61% considering reducing the amount of time they spend working in general practice.
 
Dr Djakic believes it is even more frustrating for GPs when things that are touted as ‘technological solutions’ instead end up creating more work.
 
‘I hold a great dislike for technology solutions that actually burden us more rather than unburden us and I’m afraid, within our environment, there are quite a few federal services that look clever that, in fact, are fairly dumb,’ he said.
 
‘There’s an online system where, for the first time in 28 years of my career, I now have to manually transcribe a Medicare number into a digital document, and I look at that as an absolute failure of design.’
 
Dr Djakic now hopes the Government will take note of the issues here.
 
‘We would like to see more nuanced and sophisticated digital services that enable care rather than potentially have an adverse effect,’ he said.
 
‘I’m in no way wanting to abandon the safety and security of data, but it has to become more streamlined process.
 
‘It’s about making sure that the services we’re engaging with, particularly modernised services that are on our digital desktops, are actually fit for purpose.’
 
Log in below to join the conversation.


bulk billing bureaucracy general practice government MBS Medicare PBS red tape


newsGP weekly poll Health practitioners found guilty of sexual misconduct will soon have the finding permanently recorded on their public register record. Do you support this change?
 
60%
 
25%
 
14%
Related





newsGP weekly poll Health practitioners found guilty of sexual misconduct will soon have the finding permanently recorded on their public register record. Do you support this change?

Advertising

Advertising

 

Login to comment

Dr Paul Adam Baggaley   30/08/2024 10:53:41 AM

Please include DVA in this discussion. The amount of red tape with them is monstrous, and getting worse. Firstly their authority line now with waits of up to 20mins, often needing to ring for frivolous items like moisturiser, shampoo or sunscreen, not allowing repeats for opioids requiring a monthly appointment and call, not having an online equivalent to medicare/proda to be able to avoid calling..... the list goes on. And of course their huge and increasingly unclear/vague forms which waste so much time.


Dr Vivienne Ramsbottom   30/08/2024 1:03:51 PM

Please add to that list the completion of Centrelink, NDIS applications, Parking permits and similar forms that ask for medical information that is not frequently interpreted accurately. It is a poor use of GP time and adds to the red tape mountains.


Dr Philip Ian Dawson   30/08/2024 1:09:52 PM

Who "waits on the phone" for authority scripts these days? Not me, only if the PRODA system is down, which happens rarely. The biggest beef I have with it is it logs you out every 30 minutes due to "privacy". It should keep me logged in for a whole session, say at least 3.5 hours, so only 2 logins needed per day.
Most off these annoy our office staff not doctors. We have a centrelink form in Medical director that pre populates. The form for a DSP application does not pre populate. If centrelink sent their forms as a WORD document rather than a PDF it would be much easier for us to make a template, but mor efficient if they sent every practice a template already done.


Dr Cindy Jean Clayton   30/08/2024 6:46:17 PM

The patients can see this circus going on. No wonder they think we’re clowns. Cui bono?


Dr Peter James Strickland   31/08/2024 5:21:11 PM

Authority scripts for basic items of necessity are simply public servant created nonsense. Authority scripts should be for really expensive items as per chemotherapy etc. , and not for routine things like PPIs , strong analgesics for known recurrent serious pain etc. It is all a matter of trust with all of these scripts, as they are almost always approved in my experience, but they take up an enormous amount of nonsensical phone calls. The RACGP could solve this problem by telling the Fed. Govt. that GPs will simply put the Authority phone no. on the so-called authority script, and get the patient to phone them up for approval, and wait for the patient backlash when they(Govt) have problems with both the patients and public servants! There are no problems for GPs with bureaucracy, but simply solutions, aren't there? Hmm!


Dr Adrian Peter Kenny   31/08/2024 8:05:24 PM

Authority scripts are the bane of my life. If doing it by phone we first have to endure the same 20 second voicemail message every time. I do around 10 Authority scripts per day, 5 days a week 46 working weeks a year. If you add all that up, 20 seconds x 10 per day x 5 days per week x 46 weeks x 31000 GPs it amounts to a staggering 45GP years of wasted time listening to a message we've heard literally thousands of times before.. And that's BEFORE you get to the music on hold... But wait, the message tells you that you can use the HPOS website. Hey let's get digital! No, back to the Stone Age with 80 (believe me, I've counted them) clicks and keystrokes to log in to PRODA then enter the patient's Medicare number, drug name, script number, then agree to draconian penalties if you get it wrong, AND THEN check QScript on your expensive state based alternative which should have been a single national system. \ Rant