News
NDIS report details mass delays, confusion
The review into the National Disability Insurance Scheme contains 29 recommendations designed to reduce wait times and improve services.
Many people have found navigating the NDIS confusing and frustrating.
Commissioned by the Federal Government following the election in May last year, the report has been released for public consultation days after it was revealed more than 1200 people died waiting to access the scheme between 2017 and 2019.
It states many people found the transition from state-based programs to the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) ‘confusing and frustrating’, and that the scheme itself is complex and difficult to manage.
There are also concerns related to a lack of transparency around how the body that oversees the scheme, National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA), makes decisions.
The report’s author, former senior public servant David Tune, made 29 recommendations on how to improve the program, which includes extending the life of funding support for recipients from two to three years if their needs are ‘stable’.
However, Chair of the RACGP Specific Interest Disability network, Associate Professor Bob Davis, told newsGP while the report accurately describes many of the problems found in the scheme, more work is needed to find solutions.
‘I don’t think its purpose was really to provide the absolute solution, it was more a review to identify what the problems were,’ he said.
‘It’s identified the gaps but hasn’t put forward a process outside of changing legislation of overcoming those deficits.
‘So from a GP-perspective I think it’s “watch this space” at the moment.’
However, one recommendation Associate Professor Davis believes is crucial is the ability to more easily amend disability plans.
‘In the past there have been times when plans have clearly been inadequate, but there was a real problem in getting them amended,’ he said.
‘If plans need to be reviewed, from my perspective they need to accelerate the ability to do that.
‘As well as that, I think one of the fundamental problems is workforce issues. That means, training and developing skillsets so that we have enough people able to do the assessments and provide the support. At the moment there’s quite a lag time.’
The report also calls for more flexibility in the use of NDIS funds, as well as changes that would clarify when an impairment is considered permanent for people with psychosocial disability, ‘appreciating that their needs may be episodic and fluctuate over time’.
Dr James Antoniadis, a GP and psychodynamic psychotherapist, told newsGP such a change would benefit patients and better reflect the real-world experiences of people with psychosocial disability.
‘I see patients who have had periods of up to years in which they’re functioning reasonably well with often some background emotional problems, and then years of being unable to work and totally disabled,’ he said.
‘[Under the current system] the NDIS would treat them as if they’re always having the same level of disability. But for many people, mental health issues fluctuate.
‘That also creates a situation where the patient is in a way discouraged from feeling better, for fear they’re going to be deemed to be well and no longer disabled, and therefore should have any benefits taken away from them.’
The proposed changes would also see the references to ‘psychiatric conditions’ replaced with ‘psychosocial disability’ when determining eligibility, which Dr Antoniadis supports.
‘In the past, if someone really wanted to receive disability benefits, they would seek out a doctor who’s going to find a severe enough diagnosis to justify it, rather than have someone measure their level of disability,’ he said.
‘A common one is Asperger’s syndrome or autism … because if they have a diagnosis of autism, then they can get lots of money for the school to have teacher aides etcetra. But it’s not always helpful for the child to end up with that diagnosis and if it’s inaccurate they’re probably going to get the wrong sort of help anyway.
‘The level of psychosocial disability is much more important than the actual diagnosis.’
Log in below to join the conversation.
mental health National Disability Insurance Scheme NDIS psychosocial disability
newsGP weekly poll
Which incoming change do you think will be most beneficial to women’s healthcare?