Advertising


News

Nurse-led clinics ‘another slap in the face’


Jolyon Attwooll


18/10/2023 3:57:21 PM

The RACGP has strongly criticised the establishment of five new urgent care clinics in the ACT, saying they contradict Federal guidance.

Nurse-led clinics ‘another slap in the face’
The new Urgent Care Clinics will operate out of existing nurse-led walk-in centres

Five urgent care clinics (UCCs) announced for the ACT on Wednesday go against operational guidelines that they be led by GPs, the RACGP has said.
 
The clinics will operate out of existing nurse-led walk-in centres, in contrast to guidance published by the Department of Health and Aged Care that the UCCs ‘be GP led, with staffing mix based on availability, local need and context’.
 
According to ACT Government’s media release, three new nurse practitioners and three new advance practice nurses will staff the UCCs, while an advanced scope physiotherapist, and an extra radiographer and sonographer will be employed at one of the clinics.
 
RACGP President Dr Nicole Higgins is strongly critical of the move.
 
‘Today’s announcement was frankly another slap in the face for ACT GPs and Canberrans,’ she said.
 
‘Canberra’s hospitals have the worst wait times in the country, and unfortunately Chief Minister Andrew Barr has shown yet again that he doesn’t understand how to fix the problem, or how the health system works.’
 
Dr Higgins said the set-up is in contrast to the best value model of urgent care supported by the RACGP, which advocates basing UCCs in existing general practices where GPs work collaboratively with nurses.
 
She said such clinics are better equipped to provide more immediate treatment, and a wider range of services to patients, while the ACT model is likely to lead to inefficiency, duplication of care and higher costs.
 
‘Ultimately, this will leave Canberrans waiting longer in the emergency department, or to see their GP,’ she said.  
 
‘This comes after Andrew Barr decided to impose an extra payroll tax on general practices, which will make care harder to access and more expensive, as most practices will be forced to pass on the costs to patients.’
 
Wait times in the Canberra’s hospital emergency departments have deteriorated according to ACT Health’s annual report for 2022–23, while the city also has the lowest bulk billing rate in Australia.
 
The five ACT-based clinics form part of the Federal Government’s election commitment to set up 58 UCCs, a pledge designed to reduce the pressure on the hospital system.
 
The RACGP, along with the AMA, submitted feedback in April this year for consultation on the proposed model to base the UCCs in existing walk-in centres.
 
‘This ACT model has been presented as a fait accompli rather than developed in consultation with GPs,’ a letter co-signed by RACGP NSW and ACT Chair Professor Charlotte Hespe stated.
 
‘There is no evidence available to us that alternative models were considered.’
 
The submission highlights the existence of GP after-hours clinics, as well as a locum medical service in the city. 
 
‘Please note that we do not currently advocate for either of these options: we simply do not have enough data to know what options might provide a viable solution,’ the letter states.
 
‘However, it is telling that no mention has been made in any consultations about considering any option for an urgent care clinic apart from the solution that is now to be implemented very shortly.’
 
Associate Professor John Adie, the inaugural Chair of RACGP Specific Interests Urgent and Emergency Presentations to Primary Care, said the timeframe for setting up the UCCs is likely to have played a part in the existing set-up.
 
‘What it’s taken New Zealand 30 years to put together, we are trying to do in a much shorter time,’ he told newsGP.
 
‘A lot of the issues are teething issues, because as there’s more training, there’s going to be more GPs, nurse practitioners, and hopefully community paramedic practitioners working in the urgent care space.’
 
Associate Professor Adie has previously spoken of his support for the introduction of urgent care clinical standards, and advocates a similar model for Australia as for New Zealand.
 
Having trained in New Zealand, he said that he is accustomed to an urgent care practitioner-led model.
 
‘We don’t have urgent care practitioners over here in Australia, so my preferred model is the GP model,’ he said.
 
‘Just like when I was working in emergency department, even though I was vocationally registered in general practice and urgent care, there was always a consultant that I could refer to even if I didn’t have to talk to them on the shift him or her.
 
‘That was the model that I worked under, which is the model that I’m proposing for Australia.’
 
The five UCCs announced on Wednesday are joint funded, with the Federal Government contributing $7.1 million over three years.
 
They are expected to be fully operating as UCCs early next year.
 
Log in below to join the conversation.
 



ACT UCC Urgent care clinics


newsGP weekly poll Which RACGP request would you most like the Government to fund in the upcoming Federal Budget?
 
25%
 
7%
 
56%
 
4%
 
5%
Related





newsGP weekly poll Which RACGP request would you most like the Government to fund in the upcoming Federal Budget?

Advertising

Advertising


Login to comment

Dr Hussam Waleed Mohammed Al-Bajalan   19/10/2023 8:06:49 AM

And yet we have to study red book, silver book all the colors books. Do exams follow guidelines. RACGP curriculum, TGA and AHPRA rules. Being hassled every day bu new restrictions , now GP jobs given to pharmacist now nurses and who knows in near futur who else. You are trying to encourage med students to work as GP when they see or read this do you think they still wants to be a GP. After what I am seeing now I wish that I never decide to be GP


Dr Shanti Sojamani Thumati   19/10/2023 9:00:37 AM

Yes


Dr Christine Mary Martin   19/10/2023 12:31:31 PM

I always felt nurse practitioners would one day be taking over GP jobs and be a referral based centre to specialists ? Guess we are now looking at that transition ?


Dr Angela Maree Roche   19/10/2023 12:41:49 PM

Inevitable. And so quickly it has happened. It’s what the “ Strengthening Medicare “ ethos was all about . Role substitution . And you all want to sign up for My Medicare - another part of the package . The end to any medical student choosing general practice .


Dr Steven Jon Hambleton   19/10/2023 2:25:16 PM

"three new nurse practitioners and three new advance practice nurses will staff the UCC" I would be very interested to know where the nurse practitioners received their training in Primary Care and the depth and breadth of that training in Primary Care. In addition, I remember being a "new" GP and I remember how many times I relied on the wisdom of one of my more senior colleagues and that was "with" comprehensive broad based training.


Dr Mary-Anne Lee   19/10/2023 2:45:40 PM

My experience with the midwives clinic at the GCUH has lead to instructions for me to do HBA1 only for gestational diabetes diagnosis and U/S ordered at set 4 weekly intervals for a patient. I queried the former throught the Alignment team and I think the message has got back to them that you cannot use HBA1 to diagnose gestational diabetes.
The patient thinks its great that getting to see their baby progressively. Im not sure if this was the call of the midwives or one of the lesser known radiology practices trying to establish themselves into the antenatal market with package deals.
What happened to clinical assessment and U/S if worried. Doesn't this already add more cost to a finite Medicare budget by trying to save money by delegatingGP work to allied health professionals.


Dr David Zhi Qiang Yu   19/10/2023 10:13:26 PM

This is another sample of fragmented care for the patients and community. The movement should be stopped immediately by our college.


Dr Edward Thomas Wu   19/10/2023 11:26:48 PM

Bare foot doctoring is historical reflecting the stage of social and economic development.