Advertising


News

Pharmacy prescribing expansion a ‘race to the bottom’ of healthcare


Michelle Wisbey


8/08/2024 3:54:57 PM

An extension of Queensland’s controversial contraception prescribing pilot has left GPs seething, saying it is ‘tokenistic’.

Pharmacist speaking to a patient.
Consultations will range in price from $18.85 to $68.10 depending on length.

Eligible Queensland patients can now bypass their GP and head straight to a pharmacist to begin hormonal contraception, as a controversial pilot program officially expands across the state.
 
The Community Pharmacy Hormonal Contraception Pilot was extended on Thursday, bringing about a new wave of concern from GPs, who say the program is risking patient safety and further fragmenting care.
 
The trial was announced by the Queensland Government earlier this year to allow greater access to contraception amid ‘ongoing challenges around access to primary healthcare services’.
 
Community pharmacists participating in the pilot can now consult with patients about their contraception needs, determine a management plan, and prescribe treatments, all without involving a GP.
 
Contraceptives which can be accessed as part of the pilot include the combined oral contraceptive pill, depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, and the combined hormonal contraceptive vaginal ring.
 
This can be done after pharmacists have completed a six-hour course and added consulting rooms to their premises.
 
Consultations will range in price from $18.85 to $68.10 depending on length, and are not eligible for Medicare rebates, with prescriptions not subsidised by the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme.
 
RACGP Queensland Chair Dr Cathryn Hester told newsGP the expansion has left her highly disappointed, describing it as ‘a missed opportunity’ to meaningfully support the provision of quality healthcare.
 
‘The expansion of this pilot deteriorates healthcare standards in Queensland even further in terms of quality, whole-person care,’ she said.
 
‘We see this as a tokenistic approach to “improve access”, which really is only going to benefit pharmacy owners. 
 
‘A pharmacist is simply not capable or trained to provide whole-of-person women’s healthcare, and we should never confuse the act of selling a box of oral contraceptive pills for actually providing women’s healthcare – as a woman and a GP, I would find that highly insulting.’
 
The pilot is open to women aged 16 and older who meet other eligibility requirements, while eligible pharmacists must complete a compulsory training course to participate.
 
It is the latest in a long list of similar pilot programs to be launched by the Queensland Government, with eligible pharmacists now able to prescribe for, among others, shingles, acne, smoking cessation, and structured prescribing as part of a chronic disease management program.
 
The pilots have drawn significant concerns from GPs, with past criticism saying they ‘make no sense‘ and are a ‘significant overreach‘. 
 
They come after the Therapeutic Goods Administration was previously asked to consider down-scheduling oral contraceptives, but decided against the idea as ‘consultation with a pharmacist is not sufficient to ensure safety, particularly over extended periods of time’.
 
Dr Hester said she has significant concerns about the pilot’s care fragmentation, and what will be missed when ‘women’s healthcare is conflated with selling a script’.
 
‘I’m worried that sexually transmitted infections will go undiagnosed, that cervical cancer screening will be foregone, that episodes of domestic abuse will never have a chance to be addressed,’ Dr Hester said.
 
‘These are the types of consults I have every day when my patients book in for “just an oral contraceptive pill script” that would have zero chance of being appropriately addressed in a retail pharmacy environment. 
 
‘My patient cohort much prefers to see their usual GP in a quiet, safe and private location than to see a random prescribing pharmacist in a retail environment.’
 
Adding to growing concerns, last month researchers revealed serious discrepancies in urinary tract infection (UTI) prescribing protocols, finding a ‘deficiency in the quality of most clinical management protocols governing pharmacist-led UTI management’.
 
Several other states have now followed Queensland’s lead with the introduction of pharmacy pilots covering a range of treatments.
 
And Dr Hester now fears this is just the beginning of pharmacy prescribing.
 
‘There is an element of contagion to the other states – it seems like a race to the bottom of healthcare for Australia at the moment,’ she said.
 
‘We will continue to fight this; GPs and our communities deserve better.’
 
More Queensland community pharmacists are expected to start offering the service later this year, with the pilot to continue until 30 June 2025.
 
Log in below to join the conversation.


North Queensland pharmacy pilot NQPHN pharmacy prescribing scope of practice


newsGP weekly poll Would it affect your prescribing if proven obesity management medications were added to the PBS?
 
87%
 
9%
 
3%
Related





newsGP weekly poll Would it affect your prescribing if proven obesity management medications were added to the PBS?

Advertising

Advertising

 

Login to comment

Dr Fiona Yau   9/08/2024 8:35:15 AM

Well said Cathryn. We know who will need to deal with any negative outcomes as a result of this decision.


Dr Effie Parakilas   9/08/2024 8:38:24 AM

Your comments are so accurate Cathryn. I wonder why the QLD government is choosing to ‘improve access’ through private pharmacies rather than actually setting up and staffing state-funded family planning clinics or outpatient gynaecology clinics that provide comprehensive contraception options for all women, including IUD insertion and Implanon insertion? If access to primary care is their genuine concern why don’t they meet the need themselves?


Dr Christine Barstad   9/08/2024 8:55:06 AM

I think it is fairly clear that the Australian Government is not interested in paying for high quality medical care to the general public. High quality care will only be for the wealthy who can afford to pay and politicians are among those who can pay. GPs believe in universal access to quality care however, and that is why we keep trying to secure access for all but we can't provide any care if we end up closing our offices thus we are cornered by the government. A lot may rest upon how much value they put on the 721 in the near future. We shall see how much they are invested in quality preventive medicine presently.


Dr Andrew Milne   9/08/2024 12:25:40 PM

I think this shows how the lack of GP's is, and is going to be, dealt with: just make us superfluous and replace with allied health. At first glance they are cheaper and their union/workforce associations make more noise.
I foresee a big push by pharmacies and others to further expand prescribing and diagnosing when GP clinics start to shut down due to payroll tax and those nearing 70 retiring due to expanding red tape!


Dr Paul Po-Wah Hui   9/08/2024 12:37:30 PM

Pharmacists with extra training can enhance primary health care in rural centres and won’t be able to replace SPECIALIST GPs with years of training and experience plus extra clinical skills.


Tasmedic   9/08/2024 12:40:47 PM

We seem to be gradually heading towards a 3rd world standard of healthcare where apothecaries make a fantastic living by selling antibiotics willy nilly for every symptom, along with vitamins for "support".


Dr Matthew Piche   9/08/2024 12:57:48 PM

Fighting for scraps like this is a sorry state for the profession.
I have no problem with pharmacists prescribing first line UTI meds, antivirals for shingles, or OCP. Mind numbing medicine, we debase ourselves arguing over jurisdiction of it.

The whole medical economy is so protectionist that GP's and other specialists alike are terrified of anyone learning to do what they do. The word "safety" has acquired a whole new meaning: "don't take my job!"

Should a pharmacist or a nurse be condemned to a servile role and not be allowed to help people if they are so capable? For example, a friend came down with shingles, it was 3 weeks to see a GP just to get a prescription for valaciclovir.

General practice is subject to much of the same role-restriction by other colleges who are similarly fearful of encroachment. Now, we seek to impose on other health practitioners the same treatment.
I'd like to see a more collaborative approach across all specialties and fewer lines in the sand


Dr Brendan Sean Chaston   9/08/2024 8:25:12 PM

The Racgp needs to realise that nobody is listening to them (apart from GPs). A well constructed argument supported with science and fact no longer carries any weight or influence. What’s sounds appropriate to us (GPs) is irrelevant to politicians and bureaucrats. It’s all about ‘optics’ and ‘appearances’ . Primary care is being outsourced. Time to hand over the RACGP management to the younger generation so they can protect their future. Our ‘wise’ and ‘wisdom’ filled dialogue is no longer valued- like it or not ( me include).


Dr Saluay Kidson   12/08/2024 3:29:59 PM

Great comments here. I am intrigued that pharmacists who sell drugs can now prescribe them. The separation was always a pillar of healthcare delivery in Australia. Vets do both and now pharmacists. Are doctors next? Pandora's box comes to mind!