Advertising


News

Complaints about AHPRA notifications increase by 39%: Ombudsman


Jolyon Attwooll


8/11/2023 5:19:16 PM

While overall complaints about the regulator went down over the past year, its notifications process has come under heavy scrutiny.

GP stressed about AHPRA notification
Complaints about the way notifications are managed have gone up significantly in the past 12 months.

There have been fewer complaints about AHPRA overall but a sharp spike in those about the notifications process, according to the National Health Practitioner Ombudsman (NHPO).
 
Figures contained in its recently released annual report show complaints about notifications have gone up by more than a third compared to the previous 12 months, with the rise in those related to fairness and the process itself labelled as ‘troubling’ by the NHPO.
 
‘We continue to explore the causes of these increases,’ the report states.
 
‘It is important that AHPRA’s attempts to reduce the length of time taken to manage notifications does not lead to negative results downstream.’
 
More health practitioners are also approaching the NHPO than previously, leading the report’s authors to suggest that the 27% increase could reflect an expanding awareness of its role.
 
Nonetheless, most issues raised about the handling of a notification were made by the person who made the complaint.

The NHPO also acknowledged concerns from practitioners about the potential abuse of the AHPRA notifications process.
 
Accounting for 430 complaints (65% of the total), the feedback surrounding the notifications process was a return to pre-pandemic trends, the NHPO believes.
 
‘This trend has been consistent for many years,’ the report states.
 
‘However, the volume of notification-related complaints was 39% higher than last financial year.’
 
In 2022–23, there was also a significant slide in the number of COVID-19-related complaints, the NHPO notes, with just 12 relating to pandemic policy or response compared to 306 during the previous year.
 
‘This change drove the overall reduction in the number of Ombudsman complaints we received this financial year,’ the annual report states.  
 
When approached about the NHPO report, AHPRA referenced the volume of complaints it receives.
 
‘Although there was an increase in complaints that related to notifications, it’s important to note that last year we received 9706 notifications about 7970 practitioners, and closed more than 10,500 notifications,’ a spokesperson for AHPRA and the national boards told newsGP.
 
‘It is reassuring to note that the vast majority of complaints referred to the NHPO are closed with no further action required.’
 
They also referred to ‘significant changes’ it has been made to the way notifications are managed.  
 
‘We increased resources focused on those issues we assess as posing a significant risk to the public,’ they said.
 
‘Through the introduction of a revised case-management process we also better identified low-risk notifications suitable for an early determination, while referring higher-risk notifications to our new strengthening practice team.’
 
According to AHPRA, around half of the notifications accepted last year were referred to the strengthening practice team.
 
‘This new way of working means that, where appropriate, we champion non-adversarial, personal engagement between notification staff, our clinical advisors and the practitioners who are the subject of a notification,’ they stated.
 
‘This allows safeguards to be put in place to protect the public while detailed information is sought in line with the complexity of the issue raised.’
 
In its annual report, the NHPO acknowledged the impact of the regulator’s efforts to cut the length of time to resolve notifications.
 
‘While our office identified some concerns with AHPRA’s new triaging model, it appears to have helped AHPRA to manage notifications more quickly,’ the annual report states.
 
It said the number of complaints linked to delays fell to 92 from 110.
 
‘However, the triaging model has also changed the number of concerns AHPRA manages as a notification,’ the NHPO noted.
 
‘This has flow-on effects for how we record complaint issues.’
 
Fourty-four complaints, including 41 by health practitioners, alleged that AHPRA had failed to identify a notification as vexatious. Of those, 16 had involved regulatory action regarding the practitioner’s registration.
 
The Ombudsman said a review of vexatious complaints processes ‘will strengthen protections against the use of the notifications process to cause harm, while ensuring that the process remains open and accessible to notifiers raising concerns about patient safety’.
 
A newsGP survey earlier this year suggested that four in five readers believe they have been the subject of a complaint that was an improper use of the system. 
 
Log in below to join the conversation.



AHPRA National Health Practitioner Ombudsman NHPO notifications


newsGP weekly poll Which RACGP request would you most like the Government to fund in the upcoming Federal Budget?
 
25%
 
7%
 
56%
 
4%
 
6%
Related






newsGP weekly poll Which RACGP request would you most like the Government to fund in the upcoming Federal Budget?

Advertising

Advertising


Login to comment

Jim Glaspole   9/11/2023 5:31:48 AM

There should be a penalties for making an unreasonable and vexatious complaints, with compensation to the affected party.


Dr Daniel Petrus Jacobus Bothma   9/11/2023 10:10:18 AM

A major issue with the AHPRA notification/investigation process is that AHPRA will NEVER admit or state the doctor made no mistake. "No further action required" is their usual result when investigating a vexatious or false accusation.
This is frustrating because it does not deter the type of individual who makes these types of complaint. If AHPRA could be just, and fair, they would state "no fault on the part of the doctor", but I guess that is not what they aim to do.


Dr Mehdi Saeidpour   9/11/2023 12:26:00 PM

The prevailing criticisms of AHPRA's allegedly unfair and punitive practices appear to be an exercise in futility. As a monopolistic entity, AHPRA operates with prosecutorial zeal in the defense of patient welfare, often concluding cases with either a notification or a penalty levied against medical practitioners, absent a thorough investigation. This process not only undermines the mental health of these practitioners but also erodes trust in the regulatory framework. A royal commission may be warranted to meticulously examine AHPRA's monopolized functions and to ensure equitable treatment across the board.


Dr Mahomed Essa Rasool   9/11/2023 1:24:18 PM

Due to IT difficulties my registration renewal lapsed.AHPRA deregistered me. It took 3 full working days for my registration to be reinstated.The process should be faster.


Dr Khoi Manh Bui   9/11/2023 3:54:27 PM

Does AHPRA have a policy in dealing with vexatious complaints and vexatious complainants ? Should there be a register of these complainants? If proven to be vexatious should there be a fine and made public on AHPRA’s website? They are in favour of naming the doctors for wrong doing why not these vexatious complainants??


Dr Ian Truscott   11/11/2023 2:09:40 PM

Having had no complaints in 40 years as country GP, anaesthetics, O&G, ED, etc, I averaged 2 complaints every day, once I started work as prison doctor.
The health service had an office devoted to attending to these complaints against me, I was told.
One complaint did get me punished by AHPRA. Unfairly. Perhaps the most traumatic experience of my life.
That’s another story.

But in seeing (only) some of these (mostly nonsense) complaints, I eye-rolled at the volume of “paperwork” (well,…. admin) involved, & thus, time wasted.

Like others my vintage, I’ve just retired; perhaps earlier than I would have, otherwise.
So I can’t practice.

But I wonder if I could help AHPRA make the system more efficient. Or even ...fairer?


Dr Trevor David Hoffman   13/11/2023 9:30:55 AM

AHPRA will continue to be plagued by frivolous and vexatious patient complaints until they reinstate the statutory declaration as the portal for complaints. There is no evidence that serious complainants will be deterred by being required to state their complaint on oath or by affirmation, and frivolous or vexatious complainants will be deterred from complaining. AHPRA already require practitioners to declare their history of criminal convictions by statutory declaration, so why on earth do they not apply the same standard to patient complaints?