Advertising


News

AHPRA eyes mandatory health checks for older GPs


Chelsea Heaney


7/08/2024 3:05:16 PM

The watchdog says complaints against older GPs have ‘jumped disturbingly’, but the RACGP warns it is a fine line between assessing competency and ageism.

A GP, in his 70s, speaks to a patient at his desk.
Public consultation is now open about whether GPs aged 70 and over should be regularly assessed.

Regular health assessments could become the norm for GPs aged over 70 years old to check if they are still fit to practice.
 
That is according to a new plan from the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) as it responds to a spike in patient complaints for older practitioners.
 
It is proposing doctors aged over 70 undergo general health checks with their GP or another doctor every three years, and then every year from 80 upwards, with consultation on the idea now open.
 
It comes as the rate of notifications made for those over 70 related to health impairments, AHPRA says, is now more than three times higher than for younger colleagues.
 
‘There is an increased incidence of health impairment as individuals age, and this affects medical practitioners in the same way as the rest of the community,’ the plan states.
 
But RACGP President Dr Nicole Higgins said the medical board is walking a delicate line between ensuring competency and enacting ageist policies.
 
‘It has to ensure it finds a balance between patient safety and ensuring that we’re addressing competency versus ageism,’ she told newsGP.
 
‘There’s always concern about using a blunt instrument, such as age.
 
‘We have to follow the evidence to inform the decision about the best way to assess competency and not make decisions based purely on age.’
 
AHPRA’s data also shows older GPs are 80% more likely to be the subject of any notification.
 
‘Overall, the rate of notifications about late-career doctors has almost doubled over the past eight years, rising from 36.2 notifications per 1000 practitioners aged 70 and older in 2015, to 69.5 complaints per 1000 in 2023,’ AHPRA says.
 
It says notifications for those aged between 70 and 74 have ‘jumped disturbingly’ by 130% since 2015.
 
For those aged 80 and over, notifications climbed by more than 180% in that same period, while notifications for doctors under 70 also increased by 63%. 
 
AHPRA says its Board saw three options ‘to keep late-career doctors in safe practice’:

  • Retain the ‘status quo’ without enacting any changes
  • Introduce extensive and detailed ‘fitness to practice’ assessments to be conducted by specialists
  • Introduce general ‘health checks’ with a GP for those aged 70 and older to ‘support early detection of concerns’
Board Chair Dr Anne Tonkin said AHPRA favoured option three as a measure to identify issues earlier and potentially prevent patient harm.
 
‘Doctors are often reluctant patients, and we are concerned they don’t always seek the care they need,’ she said.
 
‘General health checks for late-career doctors will give individual doctors and their treating practitioners information to help them manage any health concerns early and re-equip doctors to practise past their 70th birthday.’
 
The health checks put forward would operate similarly to the existing Medicare general health checks for patients aged over 75.
 
AHPRA says the results of the checks would be confidential and stay ‘between the late-career doctor and their treating practitioner and would not be provided to the Board routinely’.
 
‘The Board would only be informed if a treating practitioner made a mandatory report about a late-career doctor who refused to manage the risk to patients caused by ill health,’ it says.
 
Dr Higgins says, while the data raises concerns, she would like to know how many of the complaints within the data had been substantiated.
 
‘I’d like to see if they’ve been validated and proven, and if this reflects competency or other issues,’ she said.
 
Concerns were raised late last year over the AHPRA notification process, with complaints about notifications rising by more than a third labelled ‘troubling’ by the National Health Practitioner Ombudsman.
 
Dr Higgins says the move could also affect an already worsening workforce shortage of GPs.
 
‘If doctors are forced to leave earlier or choose to retire earlier it may have significant impacts on workforce as older GPs work longer hours, even than their younger counterparts,’ she said.
 
‘Our older workforce holds up many of our rural and regional communities.
 
‘Older GPs bring a wealth of knowledge, mentorship and they’re also often performing many other roles, in leadership, in voluntary roles within the profession so it would be a shame to see doctors leave that.’
 
AHPRA says its response is proportionate and data-driven following a comprehensive review of Australian complaints records.
 
‘There is strong evidence that there is a decline in performance and patient outcomes with increasing practitioner age, even when the practitioner is highly experienced,’ it states.
 
‘These concerns are also reflected in the type of complaints reported to AHPRA, with the rising rates of notifications for issues relating to clinical care [52% higher], communication [141% higher], and pharmacological or medication [162% higher] for doctors over 70.’
 
Consultation on the AHPRA proposal is open now, with submissions to be made online.
 
Log in below to join the conversation.


ageism AHPRA complaints GP workforce Medical Board of Australia notifications workforce


newsGP weekly poll Do you support the Queensland Government’s decision to make its pharmacy prescribing pilot permanent?
 
5%
 
89%
 
4%
Related





newsGP weekly poll Do you support the Queensland Government’s decision to make its pharmacy prescribing pilot permanent?

Advertising

Advertising

 

Login to comment

Dr Sonia Foley   8/08/2024 7:05:40 AM

I would be interested to know exactly what the complaints were about. Were they to do with incompetency regarding lack of knowledge, or to do with attitude toward a patient or some other reason? Often as people get older they get less tolerant to things and a bad attitude can often trigger other people to complain. The doctors that are coming through are trained to be empathetic toward patients. Is this the difference? I believe firstly the complaints should be categorised to see what the complaints are - whether a patient believes that their doctor is incompetent or whether they are offended by their attitude. Secondly, why the blanket approach? Why should ALL doctors once they hit 70 years of age be forced to jump through hoops because of these complaints. If someone has a complaint against a doctor, then that doctor could undergo a mandatory health review or extra training in communication if attitude is the issue. This should not be just an older GP but any GP regardless of age


Dr Ian   8/08/2024 7:24:47 AM

Older doctors may have great experience and there are problems with younger doctors as optimal health is very complex and mental health is sadly a factor .
Reduced hours or longer consults are useful for the possibly less vigorous.


Dr Maureen Anne Fitzsimon   8/08/2024 8:14:50 AM

Perhaps the complaints are based in ageism? I would like to see the figures for ages 70-75, 75-80, and 80 plus teased out. Talking to a non medical friend last night, she thinks the figures relate to the fact that, when she visits GPs, younger ones tend to refer frequently, and older ones more frequently tackle the problems themselves.


Dr Mileham Geoffrey Hayes   8/08/2024 8:52:07 AM

While I agree with regular assessments, statistics can 'prove' what you want. e.g., that doctors over 70 have less sexual assault complaints. I also question the encouragement by AHPRA to get patients to complain so as to provide justification and occupation for all these desk doctors and bureaucrats and, perhaps, those elderly doctors harken back to when they could be more frank. Perhaps annual checks for all?


Dr Peter Benjamin Adkins   8/08/2024 8:58:11 AM

No fine line here…
The Commonwealth - Age Discrimination Act 2004 is worthwhile reading in view of AHPRA's proposal.
https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2004A01302/2020-09-06/text

Part 3
14  Discrimination on the ground of age—direct discrimination
15  Discrimination on the ground of age—indirect discrimination

I hear that there are educational modules on Generational Diversity that AHPRA may find enlightening😁


Dr Farid Zaer   8/08/2024 11:32:24 AM

This is just the most distressing assumption made by AHPRA. I see an opthalmologist annually, I get annual eye and ear checks, I see a Cardiologist every 5 years despite a zero Calcium score at age 65, I do 2 yearly bowel screens, I do extensive blood tests, including Hep B antibodies titres, I am fully immunized for international travel and check titres, I have exercise physiologist assess my oxygen and lung capacity, and also train me in other aspects of exercise that I do 4 days a week for 320 hours. I have memorized the entire MOCA sheet and the MSQ for detection of dementia, if I start forgetting them then I have a problem. I do not drink etoh, smoke, do illicit drugs, do not have APOE4 genes, an have a body 11 years younger than my chronological age.


Dr Parvathy Murali   8/08/2024 12:55:25 PM

Old GPs are the pillars of primary health care
They should not be discriminated on rhe basis of their age They should be thanked for their services and applauded for their clinical knowledge and service they are doing to the community always


Dr Matthew Piche   8/08/2024 1:18:58 PM

Let's just consider what another layer of bureaucracy would have on a generation of doctors that could otherwise retire but keep working.

An of course they get more complaints. If you were doing a job that you didn't have to do any longer, would you be suffering fools as much as those with mortgages to pay?


Dr Christopher St John Kear   8/08/2024 1:54:13 PM

Is this directed at GP's specifically?
I know for a fact that there are elderly surgeons with shaky hands.... I've seen them!


Dr Isaac   8/08/2024 8:15:00 PM

I guess the time is up for Dr Tonkin to come to me and have an extensive medical assessment to approve her ability to function at a highest level and make sure she is safe to treat patients ! But I doubt if she does any clinical work at all! Just hiding behind the bureaucracy and managerial work to get a job!


Dr Farid Zaer   8/08/2024 8:57:58 PM

My last post said 320 hours, it should be 320 minutes a week.


Dr Christine Barstad   9/08/2024 7:53:58 AM

The aging process is universal and thus if AHPRA thinks GPs need this this then it would have to apply universally to any occupation supplying healthcare to the general public such as nurses, psychologists, nurse practitioners, midwives, physiotherapists, chemists, occupational therapists etc. Perhaps politicians should have to have annual physical exams after age 70 along these lines as well. If this doesn't happen then it is not something AHPRA does because of concern about patients but something they do because AHPRA is being discriminatory and choosing to bully doctors.


Dr Gabriel Roux   11/08/2024 7:29:22 AM

What percentage of GP’s are now over the age of 70 compared to 2015? If this has also doubled, APRAH’s standardisation per 1000 practitioners is misleading. The figure might only reflect a larger cohort of workforce now over the age of 70.
NB: This need to be corrected for the hours worked as well. In other words, not 1000 practitioners, but 1000 FTE practitioners.

We had warnings for the last 20yrs already that the general age of the GP workforce is rising disturbingly. We then tried to increase intake and at the same time “correct” gender disparity. So, we now have a large cohort of younger GPs that work part-time. The FTE correction might in fact have deteriorated further!

I think we are looking at the implications of inertia in dealing earlier with the problem when the first signs appeared and the bit we did, was ineffective.

And it gets more complicated:
Why are these GP’s working and not retiring, like GP’s did in earlier years?


Dr Theja Seneviratne   11/08/2024 2:42:45 PM

I am concerned about AHPRA's new plan to have a mandatory health check for older GPs. It is unclear as to why such a plan is going to be introduced.
In my opinion the reason needs to be clearly addressed. Every health practitioner should have their own GP irrespective of age. Annual, 6/12ly or quarterly visit to the GP (depending on the age and health issues) is the best way to pick up any concerning issue regarding a health practitioner, in here is GP.
Narrowing down to the group of concern, it would be a good idea that the HP visit the GP 3 times /year -if no other medical conditions need attention, anything of concern ex: cognitive decline, Mental health issues - affecting the ability to work, could be picked up and take action to manage them appropriately.
I don't agree with the plan to introduce Mandatory Health check for older GPs.
If introduced this need to be applied for every health practitioner including allied health workers.
.