Advertising


News

Impact of proposed older GP health checks revealed


Chelsea Heaney


7/01/2025 5:00:36 PM

New data shows 3142 GPs could undergo an AHPRA assessment for GPs aged over 70, leaving the RACGP concerned this could worsen workforce shortages.

Older GP speaking to a patient.
AHPRA says health checks for doctors aged over 70 are ‘among options being considered to safely extend the practice of late career medical practitioners’.

More than 3000 GPs aged 70 and over across the country could be subject to a mandatory health assessment under a controversial proposal from Australia’s health watchdog.
 
That is according to new data from the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) which revealed 8.8% of all GPs are aged over 70 and could be subject to new regulations if they are introduced.
 
AHPRA’s proposal to introduce mandatory health assessments for GPs aged over 70, announced last year, has sparked concerns from the RACGP that it could cause a serious workforce shortage and push a significant number of experienced GPs out of the profession.
 
The data, supplied as part of Parliamentary hearings, revealed there are currently 35,514 GPs in Australia, with 3142 aged 70 and older.
 
Additionally, it shows that the areas potentially hardest hit by an exodus of older GPs could be small rural towns – where GPs over 70 represent 9.7% of the workforce.
 
Older GPs make up 9.6% of the workforce in metropolitan areas, 7.1% in medium rural towns, 7.0% in large rural towns, and 5.6% in regional centres.
 
RACGP President Dr Michael Wright told newsGP he is concerned these changes could worsen the already ‘massive workforce challenges that GPs have’.
 
‘We know that the average age of GPs is increasing, and this data shows that the average age of GPs is older than other medical specialists,’ he said.
 
‘GPs play a central role in our communities, and I know many GPs who continue to practice into their 70s and 80s and beyond, providing amazing care for their communities.
 
‘We need to make sure that we're not just creating extra bureaucracy, targeting a group of health professionals, when we don't have evidence that these checks are going to make a difference.
 
‘We need to be supporting our GP workforce more than ever and reducing regulation and administration.’
 
According to the latest Health of the Nation report, almost one third of current GPs plan to cease practising within the next five years.
 
A key factor identified to be influencing this included regulatory and compliance burdens, which was referenced by 60% of participants.  
 
Considering these findings, Dr Wright said ‘introducing more bureaucracy is the last thing we need at the moment’.
 
‘This data shows there are more GPs aged over 70 ins in rural and remote Australia,’ he said.
 
‘The last thing we need is to further reduce our workforce or encourage any GPs to retire, particularly in rural and remote Australia.’
 
AHPRA announced its health assessment plans in August last year, commencing with a consultation process that closed in October 2024.  
 
At the time AHPRA said it was considering the move due to data showing doctors aged over 70 are 81% more likely to be the subject of a notification.
 
‘We are looking for effective and practical ways to support late career doctors to stay in safe practice, through health checks that will identify and enable doctors to address any risks that come from increasing age,’ said former Medical Board of Australia Chair Dr Anne Tonkin.
 
The agency stated the rate of notifications about late-career doctors has almost doubled over the past eight years, rising to 69.5 complaints per 1000 in 2023.
 
The RACGP slammed the proposal in its consultation submission, stating that the change was unnecessary and that there was no proof the health checks would reduce notifications.
 
‘This would be another regulatory burden unnecessarily imposed on the general practice profession without evidence to support effectiveness,’ the submission said.

‘Late-career GPs are highly valued, bringing a wealth of knowledge, experience and mentorship.’

A report by the Department of Health and Aged Care, also released in August last year, laid bare the potential scale of a national shortage of GPs in the coming decades.
 
It predicted a current shortage of 2466 full-time equivalent GPs, with this growing to 5560 by 2033, and up to 8908 in 2048. 
 
Dr Wright said, in addition to increasing administrative burdens, GPs say they are experiencing more burnout and emphasised the strain that notifications can put on their mental health.
 
‘We know mandatory reporting and vexatious notifications can add to that strain, and all of these issues might be increasing GPs thinking about retirement, and we've got to make sure that we don't unnecessarily add another burden.’
 
The Medical Board is currently considering three options for late-career doctors – keep the status quo, introduce an extensive and detailed ‘fitness to practise’ assessment for all doctors aged 70, or introduce general health checks with a GP for late career doctors aged 70 and older, to support early detection of concerns with the opportunity for management before the public is at risk.
 
Log in below to join the conversation.


AHPRA Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency GP workforce late-career GPs Medical Board of Australia workforce


newsGP weekly poll Do you support the Queensland Government’s decision to make its pharmacy prescribing pilot permanent?
 
6%
 
90%
 
3%
Related



newsGP weekly poll Do you support the Queensland Government’s decision to make its pharmacy prescribing pilot permanent?

Advertising

Advertising

 

Login to comment

Dr David Bird   8/01/2025 7:47:09 AM

Yes, I agree. "We know mandatory reporting and vexatious notifications can add to that strain, and all of these issues might be increasing GPs thinking about retirement". I have thought of retiring 5 years earlier than otherwise because of this.


Dr Colin Randall Fitzpatrick   8/01/2025 8:30:04 AM

With the average retirement age of doctors across the western world reducing - it is not uncommon for a doctor to retire in their 50s - it is reasonable to think that only the most robust contnue to practice into their 70s. So any checks may have limited return in terms of stopping doctors past their sell-by date. However as a doctor in my mid 60s, I wont object to a sensitive check up in 5 years as long as it is not a pass/fail test.


Dr Prashanta Kumar Mitra   8/01/2025 8:50:48 AM

I am 77 years old GP practicing in a rural Queensland town, where is huge demand and there are only three full time Gps in the population of 15000. already I am tired of high handed behavior AHPRA and if this regulation is brought in , I am sure like many other elder GPs will make me to take the decision to retire.


Dr Rosalie Schultz   8/01/2025 9:25:55 AM

I wonder whether knowing older GPs have undergone check-ups and been confirmed to be in good health will improve their reputation and community trust in our older workforce.

Ensuring our older colleagues are receiving quality care for issues such as lipids and blood pressure may lengthen their healthy life and help them practice better medicine. We recommend our patients have healthy checks so why not ourselves and colleagues?


Dr Christopher St John Kear   8/01/2025 11:09:50 AM

I'm "only" 64 years old but having seen what's going on at The Medical Board, and AHPRA, much of it instigated by folk who have no idea of Primary Care, I've elected to retire this coming August. My colleagues enquired whether I would remain registered and maybe do some teaching at the Clinical School, but I reminded them that the cost of remaining registered is about $15000 per year, since there's not only the ridiculous $1000+ per year cost of registration, but also one must remain insured, and also pay for one's CPD. It's better value to simply leave the workforce.
I expect a lot of others are feeling the same way as I. The Government seems hell bent on stealing Doctors from other countries where they are less well paid, to fill our GP vacancies. This is what happened in the UK, and it didn't turn out to be to the advantage of the Patients.


Dr Allan Stephen Walley, SBS   8/01/2025 4:21:13 PM

What is the difference between a notification and a proven fault ?


Dr Rosalie Schultz   8/01/2025 9:43:01 PM

I wonder whether knowing older GPs have undergone check-ups and been confirmed to be in good health will improve their reputation and community trust in our older workforce.

Ensuring our older colleagues are receiving quality care for issues such as lipids and blood pressure may lengthen their healthy life and help them practice better medicine. We recommend our patients have healthy checks so why not ourselves and colleagues?


Dr Duncan MacWalter   9/01/2025 8:01:53 AM

As a CASA DAME, we apply similar standards to pilots, as they also have a safety critical role.
Identifying hazards and mitigating risk is sensible, already done for this profession in Australia, so why not doctors also.
The framework is largely in place with CASA DAME's (GPs with occupational medicine interests, and who are generally not the treating GP).
Well there be costs? Sure, but a cost of doing business, reflected in your tax return and in the fee you set patients.
Another great reason to justify detaching further from bulk-billing and it's decades long under-indexation (ie real terms funding cuts).


Dr Wasan Haider Maghazaji   9/01/2025 9:34:23 AM

I think Gp are targeted these days & with each new regulation the possibility of more older GP retiring & leaving the workforce at a time of high unemployment demand & shortages of highly skilled GP .As GP we should take care of our health & don’t need this regulation to do so .


Dr Abdul Ahad Khan   9/01/2025 6:18:11 PM

I have only 3 Words to say : ' OLD IS GOLD '

DR. AHAD KHAN


Dr John Christian Broderick   11/01/2025 10:20:16 AM

If one was to follow the CASA approach ( with DAME type examiners by doctors who gain specific qualification ) then ALL doctors would be examined without exception and older ones (eg over 40) examined more frequently.
It would be hard to argue against this non discriminatory change. But that is not what is being suggested.

Would I delay my retirement to work in that area? Probably not.