Advertising


News

‘Just insulting’: RACGP demands ECG restriction reversal


Michelle Wisbey


12/08/2024 4:03:26 PM

New data shows GPs have delivered 2.2 million fewer ECG services since MBS item changes were rolled out in 2020, creating a ‘ticking time bomb’.

Doctor performing an ECG.
More than 67,000 heart attacks, strokes, and deaths over five years would be prevented through ECGs being undertaken in general practice.

Millions of vulnerable patients have gone without potentially lifesaving electrocardiograms (ECGs) following Medicare funding cuts – a decision the RACGP says must be reversed.
 
The RACGP is doubling down on its calls for funding to be immediately restored, following the 2020 review of Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) which meant item numbers for interpretation of an ECG could only be accessed by physicians, pushing out GPs.
 
On Monday, the college revealed more than 2.2 million ECGs were not delivered by GPs between 2020–22, specifically due to these funding cuts, leaving patient lives at risk.
 
With the latest round of consultation on the change winding up just weeks ago and now being reviewed, the RACGP specifically recommended the revised ECG MBS items 11714 and 11707 be introduced ‘without further delay’.
 
It comes as GPs across Australia continue to call for the change, with a recent newsGP poll finding 84% of respondents say the reintroduction of MBS items for GPs to trace and report on ECGs would be beneficial to patients.
 
RACGP Acting Rural Chair Dr Rodney Omond said this lack of support for ECGs in practices means rural patients are being forced to travel considerable distances for basic care, and many are simply choosing to go without.
 
‘This is just insulting to specialist GPs who are not being recognised as able to read an ECG,’ he told newsGP.
 
‘It’s so expensive for patients to get the service elsewhere, it costs them both time and money to get the test done, and patients would be much happier to have a rebate and pay for the service inside the general practice.
 
‘For many patients, it should be a very regular part of their chronic disease review or annual review, particularly as they get older, so the fact that it’s harder to get because it’s not being paid for by Medicare is just really very poor planning for the care of patients.’
 
An updated ‘Electrocardiogram Post-implementation Review’ from the MBS Review Advisory Committee (MRAC) confirmed the reduction in ECG services, especially for those living outside Australia’s major cities.
 
‘It is also possible that the MBS item changes have disincentivised some private general practices from performing appropriate ECGs, especially in rural and remote areas,’ it said.
 
Dr Omond said given cardiovascular disease is the biggest killer of Australians, having access to the simple, painless, and quick test as a baseline screening service is essential for general practices and patients.
 
‘Certainly, for the rural sector, it’s an essential thing for rural GPs in small towns to have in their practice, and for them to be funded properly to be able to do the service,’ he said.
 
‘The ECG is a really sensitive baseline for monitoring ischemic heart disease, and if it’s easy to get and in the practice, then a patient would agree to have one.
 
‘But if they had to travel at all or even go to a nearby hospital to get it done, they might not bother, or not have the transport to do it, and older patients might be too frail or unable to drive.’
 
The RACGP’s calls for change come as, according to the Heart Foundation, more than 67,000 heart attacks, strokes, and deaths over five years would be prevented through ECGs being undertaken in general practice.
 
RACGP President Dr Nicole Higgins said the situation has now created a ‘ticking time bomb’.
 
‘Funding needs to be restored immediately for Australians to get this care from their GP,’ she said.
 
‘It’s been almost four years since the Federal Government cut this funding, and the risk of people with life threatening problems being missed since then is huge.
 
‘The RACGP strongly opposed the funding cut which restricted certain ECG services to non-GP specialists and consultant physicians, which costs patients much more.’
 
MRAC is due to hand down its final report in late 2024.
 
Log in below to join the conversation.



cardiovascular disease ECG electrocardiogram MBS items rural workforce


newsGP weekly poll Which of the RACGP’s 2024 Health of the Nation advocacy asks do you think is most important?
 
70%
 
3%
 
5%
 
10%
 
9%
Related



newsGP weekly poll Which of the RACGP’s 2024 Health of the Nation advocacy asks do you think is most important?

Advertising

Advertising


Login to comment

A.Prof Christopher David Hogan   13/08/2024 12:25:35 PM

I was taught to read ECGs as a student, read them as an intern, read them as a registrar, read them when I was doing emergency home visits for collapses at home, read them when I staffed urgent after hours clinics & saw all sorts of conditions. When I was doing road accident rescue I saw all sorts of bizarre ECGs. I manage well over 25 cardiac arrests with intubation & CPR, did anaesthetics etc in hospitals
So because I choose to be a GP I am suddenly unworthy to be paid for my skills?
Words fail me.


Dr John Kelsall Lamb   13/08/2024 12:49:28 PM

I agree with the article, however the photograph is of an echocardiogram, not an ECG.


Dr Dheyaa Shaheed Abed Ali   13/08/2024 2:12:57 PM

Will be decided after listening to other professional


Dr Edward Peter Collinson   13/08/2024 2:48:02 PM

Unfortunately we are all under the mistaken belief that the Federal Health Department is interested in patient's health when really its all about saving money. Perhaps the Federal ILL-health department would be a better monicker.


Dr Andrew Robert Jackson   13/08/2024 5:42:07 PM

Last Friday I saw a complex patient with multiple chronic conditions including Addisons, pacemaker, heart failure and so on for an ear syringe.
He developed anterior chest pain for the first time which was almost typically ischaemic. We did do an ECG and it was a complex picture due to the pacemaker (and a lead with thrombus hanging off it). However it clearly had T wave inversion in the lateral leads. We knew this was new because we had done an ECG two months before and could compare. He was duly packaged for hospital - loading aspirin, clopidogrel, iv line etc. and sent off (we are not an urgent care clinic).

We get around the problem of the removal of the 'assessment' component of the ECG rebate by continuing to charge what it was prior to its removal. That is, the patient cops it sweet having to make up the fee, not the practice.

We tell patients if they complain (they don't it is an ECG after all) to go and see their local politician and demand that something is done about it.


Dr Mohamed Abdalla   13/08/2024 6:28:34 PM

I think the college should advise about artificial intelligence in few courses and monitor the implementation in every clinic


Dr Simon Holliday   13/08/2024 9:18:53 PM

Since the ECG MBS rebate reduction, our practice has dramatically reduced in-house ECGs. We simply referred ECGs off to the pathology company and await the prompt report with zero cost advantage to the Commonwealth.
Pretty frustrating for the many GPs with qualifications and experience in critical care.
Unfortunately, removing payments for ECG interpretation condemn GPs to continued de-skilling.
Has the Federal government really considered whether Australians are best served by a dumbed-down general practice workforce?