Clinical
Volume 47, Issue 7, July 2018

Gestational diabetes mellitus: A pragmatic approach to diagnosis and management

Alison Nankervis    Sarah Price    Jennifer Conn   
10.31128/AJGP-01-18-4479 |   Cite this article    BIBTEX    REFER    RIS    |

Background
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common condition with risks for mother and baby. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity are occurring with increasing frequency, and the incidence of GDM reflects this trend. Further, new diagnostic criteria have greatly increased the prevalence of GDM. Potential lifelong consequences exist for mother and baby if the condition goes untreated; however, adverse maternal and fetal effects can be ameliorated by effective pregnancy management.
Objective
The aim of this article is to provide practical advice regarding GDM diagnosis, management and postpartum follow-up for general practitioners, who, increasingly, will be involved in GDM care.
Discussion
Controversy surrounds many aspects of GDM. Recommendations are frequently based on consensus. In the context of a deficient evidence base, any recommendations are open to debate. However, it is reasonable to suggest a pragmatic way forward, maintaining an open mind about the current diversity of practice and a preparedness to include further research findings into future practice.
ArticleImage

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), or diabetes first recognised during pregnancy, is being diagnosed with increasing frequency. Women are entering pregnancy at an older age, are more likely to be obese or overweight and are often from a high‑risk ethnic background.1 In addition, new diagnostic criteria, now widely adopted in Australia,2–4 have greatly increased diagnosis of GDM. In Australia, GDM now affects around 10% of pregnancies but can occur in up to 30% in high-risk populations.5

GDM affects both mother and baby during pregnancy and in the long term. During pregnancy, women with GDM are at increased risk of pre-eclampsia, hypertension, early delivery, induction of labour and caesarean section.6 Long term, women with GDM have a greatly increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM); Lee et al documented the cumulative risk to be 25.8% at 15 years post-pregnancy in a moderate-risk population.7 The cumulative incidence of T2DM is as high as 70% in some populations.8 The list of potential adverse effects in neonates is extensive and includes macrosomia, fetal death, shoulder dystocia, nerve palsy, hypoglycaemia and respiratory distress.6 Long-term effects of in utero exposure to hyperglycaemia, probably mediated by epigenetic mechanisms,9 relate to a propensity to overweight or obesity, dysglycaemia, dyslipidaemia and hypertension. These metabolic changes can occur as early as in the pre-school years10 but are well established by adolescence in more than 50% of those whose mothers had GDM.11

In addition to strong evidence linking dysglycaemia in pregnancy with adverse outcomes, studies have shown the benefits of treating GDM. However, there are key questions yet to be answered. The first relates to the diagnosis of GDM. The association between adverse pregnancy outcomes and maternal glycaemia is a continuum, so current diagnostic criteria are based on consensus rather than definitive demarcation of risk. Second, the optimal timing and type of testing of women at high risk of GDM is uncertain, and the effects of early treatment unclear. Third, treatment targets for GDM remain the subject of ongoing debate. Finally, while there is agreement about the need for long-term follow-up after a GDM pregnancy, there are no consistent recommendations for its implementation.

How then can general practitioners (GPs) deal with these uncertainties, negotiate the difficult path between too much and too little medical intervention and provide optimal management for the women under their care?

Diagnosis of GDM

The recommendations for testing and diagnosis of GDM presented in this article were developed by the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) and are based on the findings of the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) study (Box 1).6 This multinational observational study, involving more than 23,000 women, found a continuous increase in adverse pregnancy outcomes with increasing glycaemia. Consensus criteria for the diagnosis of GDM are based on a 75% increased risk of fetal weight >90th percentile, fetal adiposity (body fat percentage) >90th percentile, and cord blood C-peptide, reflecting increased fetal insulin production in response to maternal hyperglycaemia.

According to the IADPSG recommendations, diagnosis of GDM is made on a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) performed at 24–28 weeks gestation in all women not previously diagnosed with diabetes. The IADPSG diagnostic criteria for this time frame,2 shown in Box 1, may also provide a reasonable guide to glycaemic status between 16 weeks and full term. These criteria have been adopted by the Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society4 and the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, but are not universally accepted,12 as there is ongoing discussion about their validity.

Box 1. IADPSG diagnostic criteria for GDM2

0-hour plasma glucose: ≥5.1 mmol/L
1-hour plasma glucose: ≥10.0 mmol/L
2-hour plasma glucose: ≥8.5 mmol/L

Diagnosis is made on at least one elevated value.
IADPSG, International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups; GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus


Testing for dysglycaemia in early pregnancy

Women at high risk of developing GDM (Box 2) should be assessed clinically and tested early in pregnancy. At present, the major reason for early testing is to check for the confusingly named ‘diabetes in pregnancy’ or ‘overt diabetes in pregnancy’.

Box 2. Risk factors for gestational diabetes mellitus from the Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society guidelines 20144

  • Previous hyperglycaemia in pregnancy

  • Previously elevated blood glucose level

  • Maternal age ≥40 years

  • Ethnicity: Asian, Indian subcontinent, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander, Pacific Islander, Maori, Middle Eastern, non-white African

  • Family history of diabetes mellitus (first‑degree relative with diabetes or a sister with gestational diabetes mellitus)

  • Pre-pregnancy body mass index >30 kg/m2

  • Previous macrosomia (baby with birth weight >4500 g or >90th centile)

  • Polycystic ovary syndrome

  • Medications: corticosteroids, antipsychotics


‘Diabetes in pregnancy’

The diagnosis of ‘diabetes in pregnancy’ is made if World Health Organization (WHO) criteria for the diagnosis of diabetes outside of pregnancy are met.13 This identifies women who probably have pre-existing diabetes. The fetus is susceptible to complications of hyperglycaemia in early pregnancy, and the mother may have undiagnosed microvascular complications. Urgent management is required to normalise elevated glucose levels. The woman will then be treated throughout pregnancy as if she had pre-existing diabetes. If the clinical presentation appears atypical, the possibility that the woman has type 1 diabetes or a form of monogenic diabetes should be considered. Testing postpartum will clarify the diagnosis.

Options for early testing for ‘diabetes in pregnancy’ include OGTT, fasting plasma glucose, random plasma glucose and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels. The OGTT provides the most information but is often poorly tolerated in early pregnancy. HbA1c is increasingly used but is not suitable for screening in women with thalassaemia or significant iron deficiency. When testing women on high-dose corticosteroids or metformin (usually for polycystic ovary syndrome), results should be interpreted cautiously.

Any one of the following values documented in the first trimester indicates likely ‘diabetes in pregnancy’:12

  • OGTT

    • Fasting plasma glucose: ≥7.0 mmol/L

    • 2-hour plasma glucose: ≥11.1 mmol/L

  • HbA1c ≥48 mmol/mol (6.5%)

Lesser degrees of dysglycaemia in pregnancy: ‘Early GDM’

While dysglycaemia in early pregnancy has been shown to be associated with a greater risk of adverse outcomes for both mother and fetus,14 the precise significance and consequences are not clear, nor have the risks or benefits of treatment been defined.

No test offers satisfactory alignment with a subsequent definitive diagnosis of GDM.15–17 Importantly, there are no tests that reliably predict pregnancy outcomes. Fasting glucose levels rise in early pregnancy, and GDM diagnosed on these levels is poorly replicated at routine 24–28 weeks’ testing.18,19 A random plasma glucose level has low specificity, and the OGTT is not necessarily predictive of later GDM. HbA1c with levels of 41–46 mmol/mol (5.9–6.4%) may identify women at higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.20

Diagnosis and management of dysglycaemia early in pregnancy is not evidence-based. The following suggestions for further testing and management are intended for guidance only until robust evidence is available; alternatives could be considered equally valid (Box 3). Testing and management should always be considered in the context of the woman’s clinical status. Addressing co-existent overweight and obesity through lifestyle advice may be helpful, given the association of these conditions with adverse pregnancy outcomes even in the absence of elevated blood glucose levels (BGLs).21 Local resources and the woman’s own concerns are also factors in determining management.
 

Box 3. Approach to testing and management of dysglycaemia in early pregnancy

Fasting plasma glucose

5.1–5.9 mmol/L: Significance uncertain. Consider lifestyle advice. Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at 16–18 weeks.

6.0–6.9 mmol/L: Closer association with subsequent formal diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Lifestyle advice. OGTT at 16–18 weeks, but discontinue test if fasting blood glucose elevated. Consider self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG).

Random plasma glucose

9–11 mmol/L: These levels are clearly elevated but their significance is not known. Warrants further testing – either fasting plasma glucose or HbA1c, and act on the basis of these results.

Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c)

5.9–6.4%: These levels have reasonable sensitivity and specificity in predicting a formal diagnosis of GDM and have been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Lifestyle advice. Consider SMBG if available, but it requires documented elevation of glucose levels for national diabetes services scheme registration.


Management of GDM

The keys to management of GDM are optimisation of lifestyle, self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), intensive patient education and introduction of medication when warranted.22,23

Lifestyle management

The combination of optimal diet and appropriate exercise will result in 50–70% of women with GDM achieving management targets. Dietary principles involve meeting nutritional requirements for a healthy pregnancy, managing gestational weight gain, eliminating high glycaemic index (GI) carbohydrates and ensuring an adequate intake and distribution of low GI carbohydrates.24 Given the over-representation of certain ethnic groups with GDM, diets need to be reflective of usual diet and culture. Regular moderate exercise, such as walking, is helpful in maintaining fitness and can also assist greatly with maintaining glycaemic levels within target.

Self-monitoring of blood glucose

Effective monitoring is essential to GDM management. A plethora of blood glucose testing devices are readily available to health professionals, and many of these are supplied free of charge to women with GDM. Subsidised testing strips are available on completion of National Diabetes Service Scheme registration. A diabetes educator is invaluable in teaching women SMBG techniques and providing ongoing education and support. It is recommended that women initially measure BGLs four times per day: before breakfast and either one or two hours (depending on local practice) after the commencement of each meal.

Treatment targets

Target BGLs are an area of considerable debate, and at this time no evidence base supports specific targets. Fasting blood glucose targets vary from high 4 to 5.5 mmol/L, depending on local guidelines.

The following values are published in the Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society guidelines in the section ‘for further research’ and are followed by many, but by no means all, maternity centres:4,25

  • Fasting capillary blood glucose: ≤5.0 mmol/L

  • 1-hour blood glucose: ≤7.4 mmol/L

  • 2-hour blood glucose: ≤6.7 mmol/L

Further treatment is recommended if, after lifestyle intervention, values are exceeded on two or more occasions at a particular time point in one week.

Pharmacological therapies

Metformin, including extended-release formulations, has not been shown to harm mother, fetus or child;26–28 however, long-term effects are still being assessed and currently it is not widely used in Australia. Approximately 50% of women who commence metformin obtain satisfactory glycaemic control.29 However, for those women who ultimately require insulin, the use of metformin can result in a delay in achieving optimal glycaemia. If BGLs are substantially elevated, it is preferable to promptly institute insulin therapy, and if BGLs are elevated consistently at a particular time point, targeted insulin therapy is likely to be more effective than metformin. The use of metformin is contraindicated in the context of pre-eclampsia or fetal growth restriction.

Sulfonylureas, while used in a number of overseas centres, are not commonly prescribed for GDM in Australia. Sulfonylureas have been associated with higher birth weight and higher rates of neonatal hypoglycaemia.30,31 Because sulfonylureas cross the placenta, there are concerns about the potential effects of an insulin secretagogue on the fetal b-cell.

No other form of oral or injectable antihyperglycaemic therapy has documented safety in pregnancy.

Insulin

Insulin treatment in GDM is safe and effective and is usually the first choice of pharmacotherapy for GDM.31,32 Few women are unable to manage insulin injections. In over 30 years at our centre, we have encountered no serious episodes of hypoglycaemia. Women using insulin sensibly and flexibly almost always achieve excellent glycaemic control. The use of a modified multidose regimen enables the use of insulin to match an individual woman’s glycaemic profile.

In cases of fasting hyperglycaemia, medium-acting or long-acting insulin can be used at bedtime. The starting dose will depend on the degree of hyperglycaemia and the weight of the woman, but common starting doses are 4–8 units. The dose should be adjusted every two to three days to achieve target BGLs. In our institution we aim for BGLs consistently and clearly below 5 mmol/L but avoid BGLs below 4 mmol/L.

For postprandial hyperglycaemia, after appropriate dietary education and review, introduce a short-acting insulin analogue before the affected meal(s). Starting doses are generally 4–8 units. Adjust doses every two to three days to optimise BGLs at around 5–6 mmol/L. Twice daily pre‑mixed insulin can be used if this is local practice, or if there is no particular pattern to the hyperglycaemia or if the woman is reluctant or unable to cope with more intensive therapy.

Fetal monitoring, delivery and lactation

dentification of the fetus at risk is important in GDM. Most GDM pregnancies, even when insulin treatment is required, are low risk. However, a small number of GDM pregnancies are deemed high risk and additional medical care is required. Careful clinical monitoring and the use of ultrasonography to document fetal size and wellbeing are the mainstays of management. A growth scan at 28–32 weeks can be useful in documenting macrosomia or growth restriction. A macrosomic fetus is more prone to complications during and after delivery, and warrants intensified monitoring and careful consideration of the type and timing of delivery.33

In most women, vaginal delivery at term is anticipated unless obstetric indications suggest a different approach. When steroids are indicated for early elective delivery, careful diabetes management is required. This may involve the introduction of insulin or insulin dose escalation, with the goal of maintaining euglycaemia. Pharmacotherapy should cease postpartum. The neonate, especially if macrosomic, is prone to hypoglycaemia, and all babies of GDM pregnancies need to have their blood glucose tested, ideally at around 1–2 hours after birth.

Women with GDM are encouraged to breastfeed. Some women may choose antenatal expressing to enable collection of colostrum for early neonatal feeding in the case of hypoglycaemia.34 A recent study has documented its safety from 36 weeks.34

Postpartum testing and long-term follow-up

It is important that all women who have had GDM have an OGTT to clearly document their glycaemic status after pregnancy, using WHO criteria for the diagnosis of diabetes.35 This testing is organised by either the maternity service or the woman’s GP, ideally six weeks to three months postpartum. Type 1 diabetes or monogenic diabetes may present for the first time during pregnancy, although this is uncommon. Unusual clinical or biochemical characteristics or strong family history should prompt further investigation.

The timing and form of long‑term follow-up is another area of controversy. Annual measurement of HbA1c is simple and practical and is reimbursed for diagnostic purposes in high-risk individuals. Another common recommendation is a fasting blood glucose measurement every 1–2 years, with the interval dependent on the woman’s level of risk.4 Ideally, subsequent pregnancies will be planned, enabling optimisation of pregnancy preparation and early testing for hyperglycaemia.

Key points

  • Before pregnancy:

    • Identify risk of diabetes and, if high, suggest follow-up with HbA1c testing.

    • Provide general lifestyle advice, including the importance of optimising weight and managing overweight and obesity. Management of obesity before, during and after pregnancy is a critical issue in women of childbearing age.

    • Where applicable, discuss smoking cessation and alcohol avoidance.

    • Recommend routine laboratory tests.

    • Commence folate supplementation at least one month before pregnancy.

  • Early pregnancy:

    • Test for ‘diabetes in pregnancy’ or dysglycaemia, according to risk profile.

    • Provide general advice about gestational weight gain and healthy lifestyle.

    • Commence insulin treatment if required or refer for specialist advice. Urgent referral is necessary for overt diabetes.

  • During pregnancy:

    • Test for GDM and provide appropriate management. If in rural or remote practice, consider telemedicine options or shared care.

  • Postpartum:

    • Organise OGTT and appropriate follow-up.

  • Long term:

    • Provide ongoing surveillance for diabetes and metabolic risk factors.

    • Facilitate healthy lifestyle for mother and baby.

Conclusion

Diagnosis and effective management of GDM improve maternal and fetal outcomes. Early diagnosis of ‘diabetes in pregnancy’ enables prompt evaluation and treatment. Pragmatically, although controversial, HbA1c will have an increasing role in the recognition of diabetes in early pregnancy, as well as in long-term follow-up of women with previous GDM.

Competing interests: None.
Provenance and peer review: Commissioned, externally peer reviewed.

References
  1. Collier A, Abraham EC, Armstrong J, Godwin J, Monteath K, Lindsay R. Reported prevalence of gestational diabetes in Scotland: The relationship with obesity, age, socioeconomic status, smoking and macrosomia, and how many are we missing? J Diabetes Investig 2017;8(2):161–67. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12552. Search PubMed
  2. International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel, Metzger BE, Gabbe SG, et al. International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care 2010;33(3):676–82. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1848. Search PubMed
  3. Diagnostic criteria and classification of hyperglycaemia first detected in pregnancy: A World Health Organization Guideline. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2014;103(3):341–63. Search PubMed
  4. Nankervis A, McIntyre HD, Moses R, et al. ADIPS consensus guidelines for the testing and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus in Australia. NSW: Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society, 2014. Search PubMed
  5. Moses RG, Morris GJ, Petocz P, San Gil F, Garg D. The impact of potential new diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in Australia. Med J Aust 2011;194(7):338–40. Search PubMed
  6. HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group, Metzger BE, Lowe LP, et al. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med 2008;358(19):1991–2002. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0707943. Search PubMed
  7. Lee AJ, Hiscock RJ, Wein P, Walker SP, Permezel M. Gestational diabetes mellitus: Clinical predictors and long-term risk of developing type 2 diabetes: A retrospective cohort study using survival analysis. Diabetes Care 2007;30(4):878–83. Search PubMed
  8. Song C, Lyu Y, Li C, et al. Long-term risk of diabetes in women at varying durations after gestational diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis with more than 2 million women. Obes Rev 2018;19(3):421–29. doi: 10.1111/obr.12645. Search PubMed
  9. Ruchat SM, Hivert MF, Bouchard L. Epigenetic programming of obesity and diabetes by in utero exposure to gestational diabetes mellitus. Nutr Rev 2013;71 Suppl 1:S88–94. doi: 10.1111/nure.12057. Search PubMed
  10. Boney CM, Verma A, Tucker R, Vohr BR. Metabolic syndrome in childhood: Association with birth weight, maternal obesity, and gestational diabetes mellitus. Pediatrics 2005;115(3):e290–96. Search PubMed
  11. Clausen TD, Mathiesen ER, Hansen T, et al. High prevalence of type 2 diabetes and pre-diabetes in adult offspring of women with gestational diabetes mellitus or type 1 diabetes: The role of intrauterine hyperglycemia. Diabetes Care 2008;31(2):340–46. Search PubMed
  12. Agarwal MM. Gestational diabetes mellitus: An update on the current international diagnostic criteria. World J Diabetes 2015;6(6):782–91. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v6.i6.782. Search PubMed
  13. Wong T, Ross GP, Jalaludin BB, Flack JR. The clinical significance of overt diabetes in pregnancy. Diabet Med 2013;30(4):468–74. doi: 10.1111/dme.12110. Search PubMed
  14. Sweeting AN, Ross GP, Hyett J, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus in early pregnancy: Evidence for poor pregnancy outcomes despite treatment. Diabetes Care 2016;39(1):75–81. doi: 10.2337/dc15-0433. Search PubMed
  15. Hernandez TL, Friedman JE, Van Pelt RE, Barbour LA. Patterns of glycemia in normal pregnancy: Should the current therapeutic targets be challenged? Diabetes Care 2011;34(7):1660–68. doi: 10.2337/dc11-0241. Search PubMed
  16. McIntyre HD, Sacks DA, Barbour LA, et al. Issues with the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in early pregnancy. Diabetes Care 2016;39(1):53–54. doi: 10.2337/dc15-1887. Search PubMed
  17. Agarwal MM, Dhatt GS, Punnose J, Zayed R. Gestational diabetes: Fasting and postprandial glucose as first prenatal screening tests in a high-risk population. J Reprod Med 2007;52(4):299–305. Search PubMed
  18. Cosson E, Carbillon L, Valensi P. High fasting plasma glucose during early pregnancy: A review about early gestational diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Res 2017;2017:8921712. doi: 10.1155/2017/8921712. Search PubMed
  19. Zhu WW, Yang HX, Wei YM, et al. Evaluation of the value of fasting plasma glucose in the first prenatal visit to diagnose gestational diabetes mellitus in China. Diabetes Care 2013;36(3):586–90. doi: 10.2337/dc12-1157. Search PubMed
  20. Hughes RC, Moore MP, Gullam JE, Mohamed K, Rowan J. An early pregnancy HbA1c ≥5.9% (41 mmol/mol) is optimal for detecting diabetes and identifies women at increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Diabetes Care 2014;37(11):2953–59. doi: 10.2337/dc14-1312. Search PubMed
  21. Mission JF, Marshall NE, Caughey AB. Pregnancy risks associated with obesity. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2015;42(2):335–53. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2015.01.008. Search PubMed
  22. Landon MB, Spong CY, Thom E, et al. A multicenter, randomized trial of treatment for mild gestational diabetes. N Engl J Med 2009;361(14):1339–48. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0902430. Search PubMed
  23. Crowther CA, Hiller JE, Moss JR, et al. Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med 2005;352(24):2477–86. Search PubMed
  24. Lee-Parritz A. Contemporary management of gestational diabetes. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 2011;18(6):395–400. doi: 10.1097/MED.0b013e32834cd3c4. Search PubMed
  25. Caissutti C, Saccone G, Ciardulli A, Berghella V. Very tight versus tight control: What should be the criteria for pharmacologic therapy dose adjustment in diabetes in pregnancy? Evidence from randomized controlled trials. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2018;97(3):235–47. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13257. Search PubMed
  26. Niromanesh S, Alavi A, Sharbaf FR, Amjadi N, Moosavi S, Akbari S. Metformin compared with insulin in the management of gestational diabetes mellitus: A randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2012;98(3):422–29. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2012.09.031. Search PubMed
  27. McGrath RT, Glastras SJ, Scott ES, Hocking SL, Fulcher GR. Outcomes for women with gestational diabetes treated with metformin: A retrospective, case-control study. J Clin Med 2018;7(3). doi: 10.3390/jcm7030050. Search PubMed
  28. Wouldes TA, Battin M, Coat S, Rush EC, Hague WM, Rowan JA. Neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years in offspring of women randomised to metformin or insulin treatment for gestational diabetes. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2016. [Epub ahead of print] doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-309602. Search PubMed
  29. Rowan JA, Hague WM, Gao W, Battin MR, Moore MP; MiG Trial Investigators. Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008;358(19):2003–15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0707193. Search PubMed
  30. Nachum Z, Zafran N, Salim R, et al. Glyburide versus metformin and their combination for the treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus: A randomized controlled study. Diabetes Care 2017;40(3):332–37. doi: 10.2337/dc16-2307. Search PubMed
  31. Balsells M, García-Patterson A, Solà I, Roqué M, Gich I, Corcoy R. Glibenclamide, metformin, and insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2015;350:h102. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h102. Search PubMed
  32. Brown J, Grzeskowiak L, Williamson K, Downie MR, Crowther CA. Insulin for the treatment of women with gestational diabetes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;11:CD012037. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012037.pub2. Search PubMed
  33. Maso G, Piccoli M, Parolin S, Restaino S, Alberico S. Diabetes in pregnancy: Timing and mode of delivery. Curr Diab Rep 2014;14(7):506. doi: 10.1007/s11892-014-0506-0. Search PubMed
  34. Forster DA, Moorhead AM, Jacobs SE, et al. Advising women with diabetes in pregnancy to express breastmilk in late pregnancy (Diabetes and Antenatal Milk Expressing [DAME]): A multicentre, unblinded, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2017;389(10085):2204–13. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31373-9. Search PubMed
  35. Kitzmiller JL, Dang-Kilduff L, Taslimi MM. Gestational diabetes after delivery. Short-term management and long-term risks. Diabetes Care 2007;30 Suppl 2:S225–35. doi: 10.2337/dc07-s221. Search PubMed

antenatal carediabetesgestational diabetes

Download article