Advertising

Clinical
Volume 49, Issue 12, December 2020

Undertaking medication review by telehealth

Leila Shafiee Hanjani    J Simon Bell    Christopher Freeman   
doi: 10.31128/AJGP-06-20-5461   |    Download article
Cite this article    BIBTEX    REFER    RIS

Background

Medication review can be delivered using telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic to ensure ongoing provision of care to vulnerable patient populations and to minimise risk of infection for both patients and health professionals.

Objective

The aim of this article is to discuss the evidence related to telehealth medication reviews and provide practical considerations for conducting successful medication reviews by telehealth.

Discussion
Leading up to the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth technologies had been increasingly used to deliver medication review services, mainly to patients in rural and remote areas, and were accepted by patients. Available evidence suggests telehealth medication reviews may positively affect clinical and cost outcomes, but there are ongoing challenges. When delivering these services, appropriate preparation – using support people, maintaining patients’ privacy, selecting the most suitable technology on the basis of individual circumstances and ensuring good communication between healthcare professionals involved in medication review cycle of care – can help produce best results for patients.
 

Medication-related problems are common in older people as a result of factors such as multimorbidity, polypharmacy and age-related physiological changes.1 Reduced contact with general practitioners (GPs), pharmacists and informal carers during the current COVID-19 pandemic may put vulnerable older people who are self-isolating at higher risk of harm associated with suboptimal medication use.

Telehealth, which is the delivery of health services over a distance using information and communication technology,2 has gained increased popularity in the global response to slow the transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Telehealth provides a mechanism through which GPs and other primary healthcare clinicians provide care to vulnerable patient populations. This includes when either the clinician or patient is self-isolating or may be considered vulnerable because of their age or comorbidities.3

The COVID-19 pandemic has facilitated regulatory and practice change to allow for telehealth medication reviews.4 In this article, the authors discuss the evidence regarding telehealth medication reviews and outline practical considerations for conducting successful medication reviews by telehealth.

Importance of continuing to provide medication reviews

Ongoing high rates of medication-related harm highlight the importance of GPs and pharmacists continuing to provide collaborative medication reviews. Medication-related problems are associated with up to 250,000 hospital admissions each year in Australia, with half of this harm potentially preventable.5 The COVID-19 pandemic may affect medication adherence and treatment continuity, and result in suboptimal self-management of non-communicable diseases.6 Evidence supports the value of collaborative medication review services, Home Medicines Reviews (HMRs) and Residential Medication Management Reviews (RMMRs) for identifying and resolving medication-related problems.7–9 These services may help GPs gather information and provide patient information. HMRs and RMMRs are Medicare Benefits Schedule–funded services that can be delivered using telehealth technologies, including telephone and videoconferencing.

Documented experience with telehealth to deliver medication reviews

Positive aspects

A recent scoping review identified 29 reports of implementation or evaluation of telehealth medication reviews in outpatient, hospital and residential care settings.10 Previous telehealth medication review initiatives have mainly focused on rural and remote areas with no or limited access to traditional medication review services, and providing after-hours care.10 In Australia, for example, the Toowoomba Hospital in Queensland implemented a system of inpatient medication reviews using telephone and videoconferencing to two rural Queensland hospitals.11 Videoconferencing has been also used to deliver medication reviews from an outpatient clinic within a medium-sized rural hospital to seven remote and rural healthcare facilities in Far North Queensland.12 Similarly, rural pharmacists have worked with community nurses to deliver medication reviews into patients’ homes using videoconferencing technologies.13 Overall, the existing evidence suggests that medication reviews delivered via telehealth may improve clinical and cost outcomes and are well accepted by patients.10

Ongoing challenges

While the use of telehealth-enabled medication reviews has been increasing over the years,10 the current COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the uptake. The pandemic has resulted in a sharp increase in the number of clinicians providing these services for the first time. The changes in funding rules have also supported the increased uptake and delivery of telehealth-enabled medication reviews. An awareness of the challenges and limitations will assist clinicians to maximise the benefits of telehealth medication reviews.

While the steps involved in a telehealth medication review are similar to those involved in a face-to-face review, conducting a medication review using telehealth may require more preparation by all parties. It may be necessary to devote more time to a telehealth review than a normal face-to-face review. Selecting the appropriate equipment and location to conduct the review may help with conducting a successful telehealth medication review.14,15 Providing patients with background information about the structure of the telehealth medication review consultation may increase acceptance of the value of the service. Professional associations, regulatory bodies and universities have created resources to assist healthcare professionals conducting consultations, including medication reviews, via telehealth. Some of these resources are listed in Table 1.

Table 1. Information resources for telehealth and telehealth consultations
Organisation Resource
The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners Resources about telehealth consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic
The Pharmaceutical Society of Australia, in partnership with the Department of Health Resources for pharmacists providing and patients receiving telehealth medication reviews
The Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency Telehealth guidance for practitioners
The University of Queensland Centre for Online Health Quick guides for healthcare professionals and consumers about telehealth
The role of support people in telehealth medication reviews

The success of the telehealth review often depends on the involvement of support people including family members, carers, friends, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Workers and staff at residential care settings. These people assist with providing or setting up devices, gathering clinical information and facilitating the medication review consultations. Support people may be particularly useful for conducting medication reviews for people with sensory or cognitive impairment or low information technology literacy, or for people from a different linguistic background than the provider. It is helpful to request the presence of support people during the telehealth medication review consultations, depending on the patient’s preference.

Privacy

Privacy is an important issue to consider during the different stages of telehealth medication reviews. When preparing and planning for an audiovisual review, choosing the best available platform with a proper level of security helps maintain patients’ privacy. Medication review consultations should not normally be recorded to ensure the privacy of both patient and provider. If clinically required, the provider can record the consultation, but only if the patient has agreed.14 The presence of any other people, including support people, at the consultation should be agreed on by both patient and health professional. In addition, patients’ privacy must be ensured when communicating the review report to medical practitioners and storing medication review records electronically.

Technology issues
Audio versus audiovisual technologies for telehealth medication reviews

Technology has a vital role in the successful delivery of medication reviews via telehealth, and considerations should be given to choosing the most suitable technology on the basis of patients’ circumstances. Telehealth medication reviews can be conducted using both audio and audiovisual technologies. Choosing the type that suits the purpose of the review should take into account the availability of the technology, patients’ preferences and their information technology literacy, and whether they have a support person who can assist with the review or provide the devices required. Overall, healthcare professionals can gather more information using audiovisual technologies, and some tasks, such as checking the storage arrangements and expiry dates of medications, are easier. Table 2 summarises which of the audio and/or audiovisual technologies are more suitable for conducting some activities involved in medication review consultations.16

Table 2. The suitability of audio and/or audiovisual technologies for conducting some tasks involved in medication review consultations
Task Audio Audiovisual
Take a best possible medication history
Assess possible drug–drug, drug–food or drug–time interactions
Assess whether there is a current indication for each medication
Assess medication doses
Undertake patient assessment on vision, mobility, falls risk, frailty, etc  
Assess adherence
Provide medication information
Assess capacity to self-manage medications by being able to correctly identify the medication name, dose and administration times and be able to access each dose (eg open child-resistant container)  
Assess medication storage  
Assess medication expiry dates  
Provide instructions for safe disposal of medications
Assess and demonstrate device technique (eg metered dose inhaler)  
Determine possible self-reported adverse events
The choice of software and hardware for audiovisual telehealth medication reviews

Telehealth-enabled medication reviews can be delivered using widely available video calling applications, platforms mainly used for commercial purposes or platforms designed specifically for delivering telehealth services. There are no approved or preferred platforms for conducting audiovisual medication reviews, and health professionals should aim to choose the best available platform on the basis of individual circumstances. The ease of use for patients (eg no installations or account set up), patients’ preferences (eg patients’ familiarity with a specific platform) and security (eg strong encryption) are some points to consider when choosing a telehealth software for performing a medication review. Concerns have been raised that free video calling platforms might not provide the level of security required for delivering these services.17 Extra features, such as screen sharing or document exchange, support the delivery of educational materials such as the resources listed in Box 1.

Box 1. Digital resources about appropriate use of different dosage forms

Similarly, there are no specific hardware listed as required for conducting these reviews, and a webcam, speakers, microphone and internet connection will be adequate. However, using better quality hardware can improve the quality of the audiovisual medication review service. Having a back-up communication mode, such as a telephone of which patients are aware, might be helpful in case technology fails.

Suggestions for how to proceed on the basis of the evidence to date

Figure 1 summarises the process of the medication review cycle of care with considerations for telehealth medication reviews. The process involves collaboration between different parties including patients and their supporting people, GPs, other medical practitioners, accredited pharmacists and other health professionals (Table 3). When the pharmacist has conducted the patient consultation online or via telephone, the referring GP should discuss the findings of the medication review with the reviewing pharmacist.18 The pharmacist is still required to prepare and send a written report to the referring GP in a timely manner. The report should outline recommended patient and pharmacist follow-up as part of the recent changes to the medication management review programs.19,20 It should also highlight the limitations of the conducted medication review in the context of the patient, such as limitations associated with using a telephone, so that the GP could take actions accordingly. A list of the items to include in the report can be found in Appendix 1 (available online only). A Medication Management Plan should be prepared by the referring GP in consultation with patient and communicated to the pharmacist. The Medication Management Plan should outline each problem identified during the medication review, the proposed course of action, person or persons responsible for implementing the proposed action and anticipated outcomes. It should also document patient agreement and indicate whether follow-up consultations were recommended by the pharmacist and agreed by the medical practitioner.18 These steps are all part of the cycle of care for patients with an aim to reduce harms related to medication use. Good communication and collaboration between healthcare professionals caring for a patient, during either a telehealth or face-to-face medication review process, can result in improved care for patients.

Figure 1. Medication review cycle of care with considerations for telehealth medication reviews

Figure 1. Medication review cycle of care with considerations for telehealth medication reviews.18 Click here to enlarge
Adapted with permission from Pharmaceutical Society of Australia, Guidelines for comprehensive medication management reviews, Deakin West, ACT: PSA, 2020.


Table 3. Parties involved in each step of telehealth medication reviews
Telehealth medication review steps Parties involved
Patient General practitioner Other medical practitioners (eg relevant specialists) Accredited pharmacist Community/hospital pharmacist Carers/family members/ friends Other health professionals*
Assessment of need
Referral for medication management review          
Medication management review    
Medication management plan      
Follow-up medication reviews    
*Other health professionals include nurses, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Workers, physiotherapists, dietitians, etc.
Medication management reviews (including follow-ups) are conducted by accredited pharmacists, with help from supporting people including family members, carers, Indigenous health workers, etc.

Conclusion

Telehealth can help with the delivery of safe, timely and efficient medication review services during and after the current public health crisis. This unprecedented exposure of both patients and healthcare professionals to telehealth, although as a result of an unfortunate event, might help with the integration of this smart form of service delivery into routine care, which may ultimately benefit people living in regional, rural and remote areas more than others.

Key points

  • Telehealth has previously been used successfully to deliver medication review services, mainly to patients in rural and remote areas.
  • Telehealth can help with the delivery of safe, timely and efficient medication review services during and potentially after the current pandemic.
  • Proper preparation and planning, requesting help from support people if appropriate, maintaining patients’ privacy, considering issues such as choosing the most suitable telehealth technology, and good communication between involved healthcare professionals can assist with conducting successful telehealth medication reviews.
Appendix 1. What a medication review report should/may include
Competing interests: JSB reports grants from National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Boosting Dementia Leadership Fellowship Scheme, Dementia Australia Research Foundation, Victorian Government Department of Health and Human Services, Yulgilbar Foundation, GlaxoSmithKline and various aged care provider organisations, outside of the submitted work. CRF is the National President of the Pharmaceutical Society of Australia (PSA), the recognised peak professional body representing pharmacists in Australia. The PSA is a stakeholder with whom the Government consulted when temporarily permitting the delivery of medication reviews by telehealth.
Provenance and peer review: Commissioned, externally peer reviewed.
Funding: None.
This event attracts CPD points and can be self recorded

Did you know you can now log your CPD with a click of a button?

Create Quick log
References
  1. Elliott RA, C. Booth JC. Problems with medicine use in older Australians: A review of recent literature. J Pharm Pract Res 2014;44(4):258–71. doi: 10.1002/jppr.1041. Search PubMed
  2. World Health Organization. Telemedicine: Opportunities and developments in Member States: Report on the second global survey on eHealth. Geneva, CH: WHO, 2009. Search PubMed
  3. The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. Guide to providing telephone and video consultations in general practice. East Melbourne, Vic: RACGP, 2020. Search PubMed
  4. Bell JS, Reynolds L, Freeman C, Jackson J. Strategies to promote access to medications during the COVID-19 pandemic. Aust J Gen Pract 2020;49(8):530–32. doi: 10.31128/AJGP-04-20-5390. Search PubMed
  5. Pharmaceutical Society of Australia. Medicine safety: Take care. Canberra, ACT: PSA, 2019. Search PubMed
  6. Palmer K, Monaco A, Kivipelto M, et al. The potential long-term impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on patients with non-communicable diseases in Europe: Consequences for healthy ageing. Aging Clin Exp Res 2020;32(7):1189–94. doi: 10.1007/s40520-020-01601-4. Search PubMed
  7. Chen EYH, Wang KN, Sluggett JK, et al. Process, impact and outcomes of medication review in Australian residential aged care facilities: A systematic review. Australas J Ageing 2019;38(Suppl 2):9–25. doi: 10.1111/ajag.12676. Search PubMed
  8. Jokanovic N, Tan EC, van den Bosch D, Kirkpatrick CM, Dooley MJ, Bell JS. Clinical medication review in Australia: A systematic review. Res Social Adm Pharm 2016;12(3):384–418. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2015.06.007. Search PubMed
  9. Chen TF. Pharmacist-led home medicines review and residential medication management review: The Australian model. Drugs Aging 2016;33(3):199–204. doi: 10.1007/s40266-016-0357-2. Search PubMed
  10. Shafiee Hanjani L, Caffery LJ, Freeman CR, Peeters G, Peel NM. A scoping review of the use and impact of telehealth medication reviews. Res Social Adm Pharm 2020;16(8):1140–53. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.12.014. Search PubMed
  11. Poulson LK, Nissen L, Coombes I. Pharmaceutical review using telemedicine – A before and after feasibility study. J Telemed Telecare 2010;16(2):95–99. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2009.090716. Search PubMed
  12. Paola S. ‘Telepharmacy’ growing in Australia. Aust J Pharm. 25 July 2016. Available at https://ajp.com.au/news/telepharmacy-growing-australia [Accessed 28 September 2020]. Search PubMed
  13. Rothwell M. Piloting a novel multidisciplinary telepharmacy medication review service in a rural community. In: Coleman L, editor. 14th National Rural Health Conference – Canberra, ACT: National Rural Health Alliance, 2017; 26–29 April 2017; Cairns, Qld. Available at www.ruralhealth.org.au/14nrhc/sites/default/files/Rothwell%2C%20Michelle_C4.pdf [Accessed 28 September 2020]. Search PubMed
  14. The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. Telehealth video consultations guide. East Melbourne, Vic: RACGP, 2019. Search PubMed
  15. Calton B, Abedini N, Fratkin M. Telemedicine in the time of coronavirus. J Pain Symptom Manage 2020;60(1):e12–e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.03.019. Search PubMed
  16. Edelberg HK, Shallenberger E, Wei JY. Medication management capacity in highly functioning community-living older adults: Detection of early deficits. J Am Geriatr Soc 1999;47(5):592–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb02574.x. Search PubMed
  17. Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency. Telehealth guidance for practitioners. Melbourne, Vic: AHPRA, 2020. Available at www.ahpra.gov.au/News/COVID-19/Workforce-resources/Telehealth-guidance-for-practitioners.aspx [Accessed 28 September 2020]. Search PubMed
  18. Pharmaceutical Society of Australia. Guidelines for comprehensive medication management reviews. Deakin West, ACT: PSA, 2020. Search PubMed
  19. Pharmaceutical Society of Australia. Media release: Remunerated medicine review follow-ups now allowed. Deakin West, ACT: PSA, 2020. Available at www.psa.org.au/remunerated-medicine-review-follow-ups-now-allowed [Accessed 10 May 2020]. Search PubMed
  20. Pharmacy Programs Administrator. Program rules: Home medicines review. Melbourne, Vic: PPA, 2020. Search PubMed

COVID-19PharmacotherapyTelehealth

Download article